I bought this after a quick glance, and was a little disappointed as I tucked into it. What I hoped for was something well-written and academically backed, and that would help spark creative ideas or inform me about literary symbolism. On closer examination it doesn't totally meet that criteria.
Firstly, as another commenter pointed out, there's some typographical errors that distract from the content. In addition, the writing styles is all over the place, sometimes curt and encyclopedic, other times proclaiming the power of symbols with child-like whimsy.
More importantly, there is essentially zero academic value presented here. There are no citations besides image credits. There's anecdotal information that sounds completely unprofessional.
Like I happened to have the page open on "scorpions" just now, and here's how it opens:
"Because the scorpion is so dangerous - it has enough venom to kill a man - in the countries where it lives its name is often not mentioned in case the scorpion is somehow 'evoked'."
What the absolute hell. This is the kind of thing you have to just ignore while you read this book. I'm going to break down why this sentence makes zero sense.
1. The Scorpion is actually 1500 species, 30 of which CAN prove fatal, and these instances are rare. So that's literally something this guy made up.
2. The simplistic phrasing honestly, to me, sounds like they're writing to children, which I guess maybe they are, but it doesn't work for adult audiences.
3. This cracker probably thinks there's like five countries with scorpions. I know this guy thinks there's like exactly Five Desert Countries out there where the monolithic native cultures don't DARE utter the name of the scorpion lest they invoke it's terrible wrath.
4. This book discusses religion and belief systems a LOT, and unlike academic texts on the topic has a weak conceptual framework and vocabulary for describing religion itself. This passage proves that. They say that people don't utter the name of the scorpion unless they "somehow 'evoke'" it, with their choice of putting "evoke" in quotes. It's as if the concept of evoking a name or image to cause that thing to appear is at once a silly and a novel idea (and a concept specific to scorpion-fearing countries), while in actuality this is THE principle behind basically ALL magic in EVERY culture. Isn't this book about magic symbols? Shouldn't you have a section on how different cultures perceive magic and invocations, and about cause and effect and related fallacies? No, that would belong in a more educational book.
Most of the entries aren't as ridiculous as the scorpion's, of course. They typically do include a lot of (hopefully true) facts which I had never heard. If it's stuff I do know, I just glaze past it.
The overall tone is one of non-committal, mainstream mysticism, which reveals that the author believes in magic and the importance of magic without them expressly stating that fact, and I think I would find more entertainment value if they doubled down and went into detail on their recommended applications of these magic runes and herbs. That would be funny.
The author's preconceived notions of magic also hinder the facts here and there. Literally every symbol which involves a circle, no matter what the culture, the author will ascribe the aspects of eternity and wholeness. Now, the cauldron with its circular rim might have been written about as possessing those properties, but I'm also inclined to believe the author didn't have much to say about cauldrons and tacked on the circle symbolism from they're own gut feeling.
A more heinous inaccuracy brought about by mystic supposition arises at every mention of the sun and moon, where the author insists that the sun is masculine and the moon is feminine regardless of the culture containing the given sun/moon symbol. If the claim is, in fact, that this is universally how the celestial bodies are perceived, then the author is wrong (there are loads of cultures where the genders are swapped). But I think, because they believe in magic, that when they say that the moon has feminine energy, they are speaking literally about moon spells and not about any actual cultural beliefs. Taken this way, it's not even a false anthropological assessment, it's religious gospel.
In the end I learned things (I think) by reading this. And a lot of energy and time went into this book - this guy really loves symbols. I can't give it more or less than two stars. It's alright.