What do you think?
Rate this book
The Things I Didn't Do
"A real page turner and one I lost several hours sleep to, wanting to turn just another page before I put it down. Another cracker from Charlotte Barnes, can't wait for the next." --Goodreads reviewer, five stars
A writer interrogates a woman who may or may not have killed her husband, in a taut tale of psychological suspense by the author of Sincerely, Yours.
After twenty-five years in the remote English countryside, living under an assumed name, Erica Miller has decided it's time for the world to hear her story--from her point of view, rather than from the tabloids or the gossips who think she got away with murder.
She hires Prudence Carr to write about her privileged childhood, her marriage, the affairs, the day her husband disappeared, and the day his body was found in the marshes. Despite evidence against her, the jury refused to convict, leaving Erica to live a life of quiet isolation.
Erica has a lot to say. But as the story unfolds, so does Prudence. It is clear that this project could make Prudence's career. In this compelling novel of mystery and deceit, everything will depend on who gets the last word . . .
A writer interrogates a woman who may or may not have killed her husband, in a taut tale of psychological suspense by the author of Sincerely, Yours.
After twenty-five years in the remote English countryside, living under an assumed name, Erica Miller has decided it's time for the world to hear her story--from her point of view, rather than from the tabloids or the gossips who think she got away with murder.
She hires Prudence Carr to write about her privileged childhood, her marriage, the affairs, the day her husband disappeared, and the day his body was found in the marshes. Despite evidence against her, the jury refused to convict, leaving Erica to live a life of quiet isolation.
Erica has a lot to say. But as the story unfolds, so does Prudence. It is clear that this project could make Prudence's career. In this compelling novel of mystery and deceit, everything will depend on who gets the last word . . .
233 pages, Kindle Edition
First published February 1, 2022
46 people are currently reading
192 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 88 reviews
February 12, 2022
THE THINGS I DIDN’T DO is a psychological suspense thriller by Charlotte Barnes, the author of Sincerely, Yours.
Prudence Carr, a writer, is hired to interrogate and write the story of Erica Miller, a woman who may or may not have killed her husband.
After twenty-five years, Erica Miller, living under an assumed name, has decided it’s time for the world to hear her story—from her point of view, rather than from the tabloids who think she got away with murder.
Prudence Carr is to write about her privileged childhood, her marriage, the affairs, the day her husband disappeared, and the day his body was found in the marshes. Despite evidence against her, the jury refused to convict, leaving Erica to live a life of quiet isolation.
Erica has a lot to say. But as the story unfolds, so does Prudence. It is clear that this project could make Prudence’s career. In this compelling novel of mystery and deceit, everything will depend on who gets the last word.
But did Erica or didn't she murder her husband?
This story is told in two parts from two different POVs, Erica and then Prudence. Both women seem to have a secret motive behind their reasons for working on the book.
This was a fast-paced psychological thriller and exciting read, but in my opinion, I was slightly disappointed with the ending, as I felt it was a little flat.
Many thanks to the author and Bloodhound Books for my digital copy.
Prudence Carr, a writer, is hired to interrogate and write the story of Erica Miller, a woman who may or may not have killed her husband.
After twenty-five years, Erica Miller, living under an assumed name, has decided it’s time for the world to hear her story—from her point of view, rather than from the tabloids who think she got away with murder.
Prudence Carr is to write about her privileged childhood, her marriage, the affairs, the day her husband disappeared, and the day his body was found in the marshes. Despite evidence against her, the jury refused to convict, leaving Erica to live a life of quiet isolation.
Erica has a lot to say. But as the story unfolds, so does Prudence. It is clear that this project could make Prudence’s career. In this compelling novel of mystery and deceit, everything will depend on who gets the last word.
But did Erica or didn't she murder her husband?
This story is told in two parts from two different POVs, Erica and then Prudence. Both women seem to have a secret motive behind their reasons for working on the book.
This was a fast-paced psychological thriller and exciting read, but in my opinion, I was slightly disappointed with the ending, as I felt it was a little flat.
Many thanks to the author and Bloodhound Books for my digital copy.
April 4, 2023
I'm not sure how I feel about this, but it's not great. I think it's particularly because this has been promised as a psychological thriller but there honestly is none. I might have brushed that off as a marketing blunder but the ending said, "No".
Throughout the book, it feels like there's a build up to some long awaited twist. Since it's a short one, I was able to forgive the bland tone overall but the book literally goes no where. There is no progression in the characters - atleast nothing to be noted on. The ending made me want to throw my phone at a wall because it wasn't simply disappointing, it was unexpectedly rushed. Like literally two lines explaining what really happened and not even proper depth to it.
The author has potential though, I just think they needed a direction. The characters were realistic enough, despite the lack of growth and I do hope to read more of their books in the future.
Throughout the book, it feels like there's a build up to some long awaited twist. Since it's a short one, I was able to forgive the bland tone overall but the book literally goes no where. There is no progression in the characters - atleast nothing to be noted on. The ending made me want to throw my phone at a wall because it wasn't simply disappointing, it was unexpectedly rushed. Like literally two lines explaining what really happened and not even proper depth to it.
The author has potential though, I just think they needed a direction. The characters were realistic enough, despite the lack of growth and I do hope to read more of their books in the future.
February 25, 2022
The Things I Didn’t Do by Charlotte Barnes is a psychological suspense thriller about a writer, Prudence Carr, who is hired to write the story of Erica Miller. A woman who possibly murdered her husband.
This story is told in two parts first from Erica’s point of view and then Prudence’s. This fast-paced revolves around the mystery and deceit surrounding Erica’s upbringing, her life with her husband, the circumstances surrounding his death, and the murder conviction following his death.
Erica and Prudence both have different reasons for working on the story. As the story unfolds these characters' personalities are revealed as well. Erica is an interesting character. She likes things a certain way and her relationship with Prudence is also interesting.
I thought the book was entertaining and kept me hooked. Although I felt the ending was a bit of a let down after the build-up throughout the book.
Rating: 4/5 ⭐⭐⭐⭐
This story is told in two parts first from Erica’s point of view and then Prudence’s. This fast-paced revolves around the mystery and deceit surrounding Erica’s upbringing, her life with her husband, the circumstances surrounding his death, and the murder conviction following his death.
Erica and Prudence both have different reasons for working on the story. As the story unfolds these characters' personalities are revealed as well. Erica is an interesting character. She likes things a certain way and her relationship with Prudence is also interesting.
I thought the book was entertaining and kept me hooked. Although I felt the ending was a bit of a let down after the build-up throughout the book.
Rating: 4/5 ⭐⭐⭐⭐
February 1, 2022
Thank you Bloodhound books for the advance copy in exchange for a honest review. Erica Miller has been in hiding under a assumed name for twenty five years after escaping a murder conviction following her husband's death. Over the years there has been speculation and documentaries but Erica decides it is time to reveal the truth about her husband's death. Now is the time to write her memoirs and employs ghost writer Prudence Carr. The story of Erica's life unfolds but did she or didn't she murder her husband?
February 17, 2022
‘Erica’ wants her side of the story heard and Prue is more than happy to help an alleged murderer. But there are rules to be laid down first and a legal document saying so.
The cover and the title are both what drew me in at first and the blurb of the book is what sealed the deal for me. I wanted to learn more about these two women and what exactly are ‘the things I didn’t do’.
This story is set into three parts. First it’s told from ‘Erica’s’ point of view and then by Prue. Despite them telling the same story, it doesn’t feel too repetitive. You get an insight to how they both viewed the interactions at the time.
The first part, Erica slowly grew on me and I quite liked Prue. However, once we get to part two my feelings changed. I never felt strongly towards Prue from there on out and my attitude to Erica was all over the place. I feel that in terms of Erica, was a great technique fitting with her character.
The final part is a round up. We get parts of the story alongside what is happening now after all the meetings.
I did enjoy the dual POV and the writing was easy to read and had a natural flow. However, I did feel like I was always waiting for something more to happen. Especially the ending, for me, it felt a little bit flat.
Saying that, I’m glad I read it. I do feel having read many thrillers in the months prior may have impacted my ability to be shocked by twists and turns. I would definitely consider checking out more books by Charlotte Barnes in the future.
#Ad
The cover and the title are both what drew me in at first and the blurb of the book is what sealed the deal for me. I wanted to learn more about these two women and what exactly are ‘the things I didn’t do’.
This story is set into three parts. First it’s told from ‘Erica’s’ point of view and then by Prue. Despite them telling the same story, it doesn’t feel too repetitive. You get an insight to how they both viewed the interactions at the time.
The first part, Erica slowly grew on me and I quite liked Prue. However, once we get to part two my feelings changed. I never felt strongly towards Prue from there on out and my attitude to Erica was all over the place. I feel that in terms of Erica, was a great technique fitting with her character.
The final part is a round up. We get parts of the story alongside what is happening now after all the meetings.
I did enjoy the dual POV and the writing was easy to read and had a natural flow. However, I did feel like I was always waiting for something more to happen. Especially the ending, for me, it felt a little bit flat.
Saying that, I’m glad I read it. I do feel having read many thrillers in the months prior may have impacted my ability to be shocked by twists and turns. I would definitely consider checking out more books by Charlotte Barnes in the future.
#Ad
January 30, 2022
From the start the reader knows that Erica had been accused of murdering her husband but was never convicted. After hiding away for many years she’s ready to put the record straight & dispel the lies surrounding the case. Ghost writer Prue is chosen to recount Erica's story & tell what actually occurred….beyond that it's hard to say much without giving away spoilers!
Told in two parts from two different POVs, Erica is the first to tell her story. She's a very prickly character, quite pedantic with her dealings with Prue & controlling – things have to be done the way she wants. The second part is told from Prue's POV & although it mirrors Erica's part - following the same timeline & conversations - it's in no way repetitive & it works really well to see the writers take on Erica's story. Both women seemed to have an ulterior motive behind their reasons for working on the book & combined with the often precarious nature of their relationship a lovely sense of unease kept building.
The conclusion, however, seemed a bit flat after all the tension that had been brewing & I would have liked the ending to have had more of an impact.
Overall, it was an engrossing read that certainly kept me hooked & guessing & I'll be more than happy to read more by this author.
* I received an advance copy from Bloodhound books & this review is my own opinion*
Told in two parts from two different POVs, Erica is the first to tell her story. She's a very prickly character, quite pedantic with her dealings with Prue & controlling – things have to be done the way she wants. The second part is told from Prue's POV & although it mirrors Erica's part - following the same timeline & conversations - it's in no way repetitive & it works really well to see the writers take on Erica's story. Both women seemed to have an ulterior motive behind their reasons for working on the book & combined with the often precarious nature of their relationship a lovely sense of unease kept building.
The conclusion, however, seemed a bit flat after all the tension that had been brewing & I would have liked the ending to have had more of an impact.
Overall, it was an engrossing read that certainly kept me hooked & guessing & I'll be more than happy to read more by this author.
* I received an advance copy from Bloodhound books & this review is my own opinion*
January 24, 2022
Erica Miller is accused (and acquitted) of killing her husband. After years of living in seclusion, she is ready to tell her side of the story. Erica hires ghost writer Prue to help her with this project.
Spoilers beyond this point:
Things I loved: Erica is simultaneously likeable and not; she’s difficult and moody, but at the same time, she’s a character that has endured years of hatred and speculation, as well as terminal illness. Prue, on the other hand, seems initially to be a sweet and rather naive person, though later is revealed to be less than a Girl Scout. At least Erica is pretty straight forward with her personality from the start.
I also really enjoyed the two view points of the story, and the subtle differences in how each woman views their interactions.
Things I liked a little less: After waiting the whole story to find out if she did or didn’t kill her husband, the ending seemed rushed and anticlimactic. The big reveal in just a single paragraph.
I received The Things I Didn’t Do as an ARC. This is my first experience with Charlotte Barnes, and it was a lot of fun. I will definitely be checking out her other work, and I highly recommend this book!
Spoilers beyond this point:
Things I loved: Erica is simultaneously likeable and not; she’s difficult and moody, but at the same time, she’s a character that has endured years of hatred and speculation, as well as terminal illness. Prue, on the other hand, seems initially to be a sweet and rather naive person, though later is revealed to be less than a Girl Scout. At least Erica is pretty straight forward with her personality from the start.
I also really enjoyed the two view points of the story, and the subtle differences in how each woman views their interactions.
Things I liked a little less: After waiting the whole story to find out if she did or didn’t kill her husband, the ending seemed rushed and anticlimactic. The big reveal in just a single paragraph.
I received The Things I Didn’t Do as an ARC. This is my first experience with Charlotte Barnes, and it was a lot of fun. I will definitely be checking out her other work, and I highly recommend this book!
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
January 29, 2022
An interesting read.
The story is told initially from the perspective of a widow who was a accused of her husband’s murder but was found innocent after a court trial. In her later years she employs a ghost writer to tell her side of the story and keeps you guessing throughout - did she do it or did she not? The second part of the book focuses on the writer’s viewpoint and her interactions with the widow. Character building was excellent throughout.
Maybe I have read too many books with unexpected twists at the end but I found the ending fell short of my expectations. In summary, the build up was good but for me the end was rather flat.
I received a free copy of this book through ARC Bloodhound Books - thanks! I have given an honest review.
The story is told initially from the perspective of a widow who was a accused of her husband’s murder but was found innocent after a court trial. In her later years she employs a ghost writer to tell her side of the story and keeps you guessing throughout - did she do it or did she not? The second part of the book focuses on the writer’s viewpoint and her interactions with the widow. Character building was excellent throughout.
Maybe I have read too many books with unexpected twists at the end but I found the ending fell short of my expectations. In summary, the build up was good but for me the end was rather flat.
I received a free copy of this book through ARC Bloodhound Books - thanks! I have given an honest review.
January 30, 2022
Yet another cracking read from Charlotte Barnes. I was lucky enough to receive an advanced copy and couldn't put it down. The author has a way of drawing you in and making you feel comfortable before pulling the rug out from under your feet. Just when you think you've got a handle on it another surprise comes along. I'm being vague because I really don't want to spoil the enjoyment for you. But I would definitely recommend you read this book.
February 16, 2022
This was a pretty decent psychological thriller. I love the way Charolotte Barns gave us Erica's POV and Prudence's POV of what happened. Erica wanting to get her story told was very important to her, and in the book you find out why. This sort of story could make Prudence's career. After 25 years Erica's story about what happened to her murdered husband, Roger gets told. Whose POV do we trust, though?
January 26, 2024
This was interesting in the fact that the novel was told from both the ghost writers perspective and the actual author. But the story fell flat for me and there wasn’t any big “wow” factor that I was hit with at any point.
May 2, 2024
Barely finished the book. Maybe it was the narrator, but it was dull and dry thru the first half. Second half was a repeat of the same info.
The end felt rushed and unfinished.
The end felt rushed and unfinished.
January 25, 2022
I received a copy of this book through the ARC Bloodhound Books, thanks.
The book is a good read, easy to get into and well written. I enjoyed it immensely and would recommend it, but feel I must add that I was slightly disappointed with the ending, it fizzled out rather than ending with the bang it deserved.
The book is a good read, easy to get into and well written. I enjoyed it immensely and would recommend it, but feel I must add that I was slightly disappointed with the ending, it fizzled out rather than ending with the bang it deserved.
February 16, 2022
This book had me hooked from the very start, and I really enjoyed seeing the story from two different points of view. It was also interesting to see the impact the press reporting influenced Erica’s life and actions, and for me it made her much more likeable.
My only (slight) criticism is that the ending felt a little rushed to me, and could have been made more of.
Overall I really enjoyed it & look forward to more Charlotte Barnes books!
(I received an advance copy of this book from the publisher, but the review is all my own opinion)
My only (slight) criticism is that the ending felt a little rushed to me, and could have been made more of.
Overall I really enjoyed it & look forward to more Charlotte Barnes books!
(I received an advance copy of this book from the publisher, but the review is all my own opinion)
February 23, 2022
An enjoyable thriller that tickled this person's funny bone! What raised this three star pulpy thriller to four stars was the dead-pan humor used throughout the story. It made this person laugh out loud several times while in the staff room.
'There's a lot of blanks in that'. (Prue).
'There must be more to that sentence'. (Prue).
'Just no? (Prue) Just no.' (Erica).
A doctor called Me. (Erica). Oh. (Prue). Oh, indeed. (Erica).
It was only in the final part did the story become pensive and sullen and with good reason. A lot weighed on the final words in the final scene. A lot! "My hourglass has turned to lie drunken, heavy and lopsided'. The story was told from two points of view (Erica and then Prue) but followed the same timeline, the tension gradually built with a sense of unease & foreboding. It sounded complicated but was very easy to read. Of course, be a good reader and don't flick to the end, to find the outcome. Enjoy the story, the dialogue, the relationship between Prue and Erica and, of course, the climatic ending! Thoroughly enjoyed! 4 STARS.
'There's a lot of blanks in that'. (Prue).
'There must be more to that sentence'. (Prue).
'Just no? (Prue) Just no.' (Erica).
A doctor called Me. (Erica). Oh. (Prue). Oh, indeed. (Erica).
It was only in the final part did the story become pensive and sullen and with good reason. A lot weighed on the final words in the final scene. A lot! "My hourglass has turned to lie drunken, heavy and lopsided'. The story was told from two points of view (Erica and then Prue) but followed the same timeline, the tension gradually built with a sense of unease & foreboding. It sounded complicated but was very easy to read. Of course, be a good reader and don't flick to the end, to find the outcome. Enjoy the story, the dialogue, the relationship between Prue and Erica and, of course, the climatic ending! Thoroughly enjoyed! 4 STARS.
February 18, 2022
“It’s better to omit your knowledge of something, rather than lie about it”
The things I Didn’t Do follows Erica and Prue as they work together to write Erica’s memoirs.
The first half of the book centres from Erica’s perspective in which she is setting plans out with Prue, to tell her story and set the record straight for those who think that she got away with murder, starting from the very beginning of her privileged childhood up until the moment the jury refused to convict her of her husbands murder
The second half of the book (literally 50% in) we switch to Prue’s perspective, so there is a time
jump back to the beginning of the story on how Prue ended up being Erica’s ghost writer, and we then follow the storyline, but from Prue’s perspective this time, so it can seem quite similar in the storyline, and you think you know where the book is going, however there are added
details and plot twists mentioned withing Prue’s half of the book.
At times it felt a little bit like “An interview with a vampire” or a true crime documentary the way that the story intertwined and was written, it is a great piece of writing. Both Erica and Prue’s character development was great as well, but there were times I was questioning both
of their behaviours, but I feel this adds to their depth, it was interesting to also see their relationship build and develop over the course of the book.
I really liked the way that the book changed perspective halfway through and I loved the inclusion of the two transcripts towards the end of the book, I found the book to be quite
engrossing and intriguing and I found myself questioning Erica’s motives and involvement from the beginning, even at the end of the book it feels like an inception moment to me, as I am still unsure as to what the truth is, which I suspect is on purpose?
Either way this is a great mystery psychological type read that I would recommend to fans of that genre!
Gifted Book from the author in exchange for an honest review
TW: Abortion, cancer and gambling
The things I Didn’t Do follows Erica and Prue as they work together to write Erica’s memoirs.
The first half of the book centres from Erica’s perspective in which she is setting plans out with Prue, to tell her story and set the record straight for those who think that she got away with murder, starting from the very beginning of her privileged childhood up until the moment the jury refused to convict her of her husbands murder
The second half of the book (literally 50% in) we switch to Prue’s perspective, so there is a time
jump back to the beginning of the story on how Prue ended up being Erica’s ghost writer, and we then follow the storyline, but from Prue’s perspective this time, so it can seem quite similar in the storyline, and you think you know where the book is going, however there are added
details and plot twists mentioned withing Prue’s half of the book.
At times it felt a little bit like “An interview with a vampire” or a true crime documentary the way that the story intertwined and was written, it is a great piece of writing. Both Erica and Prue’s character development was great as well, but there were times I was questioning both
of their behaviours, but I feel this adds to their depth, it was interesting to also see their relationship build and develop over the course of the book.
I really liked the way that the book changed perspective halfway through and I loved the inclusion of the two transcripts towards the end of the book, I found the book to be quite
engrossing and intriguing and I found myself questioning Erica’s motives and involvement from the beginning, even at the end of the book it feels like an inception moment to me, as I am still unsure as to what the truth is, which I suspect is on purpose?
Either way this is a great mystery psychological type read that I would recommend to fans of that genre!
Gifted Book from the author in exchange for an honest review
TW: Abortion, cancer and gambling
April 2, 2025
1 ⭐
Charlotte Barnes’ "Things I Didn’t Do" promises an intriguing psychological suspense—a writer, Prudence Carr, is hired to document the life of Erica Miller, a woman who has lived under an assumed name for 25 years after being accused (but never convicted) of her husband's murder. With an air of mystery, secrets, and potential revelations, this novel should have been a gripping tale of deception and truth. Unfortunately, it is anything but.
This is, without a doubt, the worst book I’ve read this year. The premise is misleading, the execution is painfully repetitive, and the entire story feels utterly pointless. The first half is from Erica’s point of view, and the second half is simply Prudence recounting everything we just read—with no new insights, no twists, and no reason for its existence. It’s an exercise in redundancy that quickly becomes unbearable.
When I started reading, I expected Erica’s story to involve her explaining how she didn’t kill her husband, perhaps shedding light on overlooked evidence or revealing something new. Instead, the book is filled with endless conversations that have nothing to do with the case. It’s just Erica and Prudence drinking, eating, and chatting about everything except "the things she didn’t do." There is no suspense, no discovery—just a frustrating cycle of dull dialogue and wasted potential.
To make matters worse, after slogging through this repetitive narrative, the ending is rushed and unsatisfying. It feels like the book spent all its time on pointless interactions and then panicked at the last moment, cramming in an abrupt conclusion.
I genuinely hated this book. The concept had potential, but the execution was so poor that I wish I hadn’t wasted my time on it. If I could give it zero stars, I would. Since that’s not an option, it gets one star—purely because I made it to the end.
Charlotte Barnes’ "Things I Didn’t Do" promises an intriguing psychological suspense—a writer, Prudence Carr, is hired to document the life of Erica Miller, a woman who has lived under an assumed name for 25 years after being accused (but never convicted) of her husband's murder. With an air of mystery, secrets, and potential revelations, this novel should have been a gripping tale of deception and truth. Unfortunately, it is anything but.
This is, without a doubt, the worst book I’ve read this year. The premise is misleading, the execution is painfully repetitive, and the entire story feels utterly pointless. The first half is from Erica’s point of view, and the second half is simply Prudence recounting everything we just read—with no new insights, no twists, and no reason for its existence. It’s an exercise in redundancy that quickly becomes unbearable.
When I started reading, I expected Erica’s story to involve her explaining how she didn’t kill her husband, perhaps shedding light on overlooked evidence or revealing something new. Instead, the book is filled with endless conversations that have nothing to do with the case. It’s just Erica and Prudence drinking, eating, and chatting about everything except "the things she didn’t do." There is no suspense, no discovery—just a frustrating cycle of dull dialogue and wasted potential.
To make matters worse, after slogging through this repetitive narrative, the ending is rushed and unsatisfying. It feels like the book spent all its time on pointless interactions and then panicked at the last moment, cramming in an abrupt conclusion.
I genuinely hated this book. The concept had potential, but the execution was so poor that I wish I hadn’t wasted my time on it. If I could give it zero stars, I would. Since that’s not an option, it gets one star—purely because I made it to the end.
February 21, 2022
The things I didn’t do - Charlotte Barnes
I was gifted a copy of this book in return for an honest review, thankyou very much to the author and Love Book Tours for the opportunity.
A section of the blurb:
A writer interrogates a woman who may or may not have killed her husband in a taut tale of psychological suspense by the author of Sincerely, Yours.
Review:
Okay let’s get to it because I seriously enjoyed reading this book! I found myself hooked right from the start and it did not disappoint. The book structure was really interesting, with the first half from Erica’s perspective, followed by a section from Prue’s perspective where they both tell their version of the same interaction. Despite re-living the same events, it was in no way boring or repetitive and in fact the differences in narrative left me wondering who the credible narrator was…or whether this is genuinely how we all go through life with different viewpoints.
Each chapter started with a seemingly irrelevant (but totally not irrelevant!) to-the-point statement or question which really got you thinking.
I also found myself continually admiring the beautiful writing style of this book, with so many incredible metaphors and descriptions which I highlighted as I went…keep your eyes peeled for another post sharing some of my favourite quotes!
Overall, I was gripped by this book and would definitely recommend!
I was gifted a copy of this book in return for an honest review, thankyou very much to the author and Love Book Tours for the opportunity.
A section of the blurb:
A writer interrogates a woman who may or may not have killed her husband in a taut tale of psychological suspense by the author of Sincerely, Yours.
Review:
Okay let’s get to it because I seriously enjoyed reading this book! I found myself hooked right from the start and it did not disappoint. The book structure was really interesting, with the first half from Erica’s perspective, followed by a section from Prue’s perspective where they both tell their version of the same interaction. Despite re-living the same events, it was in no way boring or repetitive and in fact the differences in narrative left me wondering who the credible narrator was…or whether this is genuinely how we all go through life with different viewpoints.
Each chapter started with a seemingly irrelevant (but totally not irrelevant!) to-the-point statement or question which really got you thinking.
I also found myself continually admiring the beautiful writing style of this book, with so many incredible metaphors and descriptions which I highlighted as I went…keep your eyes peeled for another post sharing some of my favourite quotes!
Overall, I was gripped by this book and would definitely recommend!
February 22, 2022
This is my second Charlotte Barnes novel so I had high expectations. I wasn’t disappointed. What I found was a story told twice, but from two different perspectives. First there is Erica who wants her story to be told but on her terms, and then there's Prue who is contracted to ghost wrote Erica’s story, but begins to realise there are far more unanswered questions about the death of Erica’s husband than Erica is prepared to discuss.
The way the author was able to tell the same story twice, but from completely different characters, each with their own agendas, was superb. Both strong independent woman, both determined to have things their way which inevitably causes friction. From each perspective, the other is hiding something important. I wasn’t sure I liked Erica which made it difficult to feel any empathy for her position, but I did like Prue and her determination to find the truth. The supporting characters, few though they were, played their parts without the need for backstories or over-interaction which would have affected the flow of the text.
While I can't say this is a fast paced novel, I felt that the story rolled along and never felt like it was dragging. Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed reading this book and would recommend it to readers of psychological thrillers and mysteries. I gave The Things I Didn’t Do, by Charlotte Barnes, four stars.
My blog with additional author and book info is live at jldixon.co.uk
The way the author was able to tell the same story twice, but from completely different characters, each with their own agendas, was superb. Both strong independent woman, both determined to have things their way which inevitably causes friction. From each perspective, the other is hiding something important. I wasn’t sure I liked Erica which made it difficult to feel any empathy for her position, but I did like Prue and her determination to find the truth. The supporting characters, few though they were, played their parts without the need for backstories or over-interaction which would have affected the flow of the text.
While I can't say this is a fast paced novel, I felt that the story rolled along and never felt like it was dragging. Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed reading this book and would recommend it to readers of psychological thrillers and mysteries. I gave The Things I Didn’t Do, by Charlotte Barnes, four stars.
My blog with additional author and book info is live at jldixon.co.uk
February 28, 2022
Erica Miller was accused of killing her husband twenty-five years ago, but was found not guilty. She has decided that now is the time to tell her side of the story after years of the media telling their side.
The first part of the book is from Erica's point of view. She hires Prue Carr to write her memoir. You read Erica tell her side of the story. How the media wrote nothing but lies. At first it seems simple enough, but as their relationship progresses and Prue asks questions, Erica reveals more information that may not be as favoring toward her.
The second part of the book is Prue's point of view. You read about her impressions of Erica and how she will use this opportunity to write the book she wants. Against Erica's wishes she digs deeper into the story. The conversations Erica and Prue have are different from Prue's point of view. As if Erica thought she said one thing, but Prue hears something else. It was an interesting way to engage a reader and make you think, what did Erica really do?
The last part brings about the conflict Prue faces while trying to figure out what story to write. She was hired to write Erica's side, but also feels like there is enough to the story to write her own.
I enjoyed this book and the way the author broke it into parts. The author still left mystery leaving the reader to guess what really happened.
Thank you to Love Books Tour and Charlotte Barnes for the opportunity to read The Things I Didn't Do.
The first part of the book is from Erica's point of view. She hires Prue Carr to write her memoir. You read Erica tell her side of the story. How the media wrote nothing but lies. At first it seems simple enough, but as their relationship progresses and Prue asks questions, Erica reveals more information that may not be as favoring toward her.
The second part of the book is Prue's point of view. You read about her impressions of Erica and how she will use this opportunity to write the book she wants. Against Erica's wishes she digs deeper into the story. The conversations Erica and Prue have are different from Prue's point of view. As if Erica thought she said one thing, but Prue hears something else. It was an interesting way to engage a reader and make you think, what did Erica really do?
The last part brings about the conflict Prue faces while trying to figure out what story to write. She was hired to write Erica's side, but also feels like there is enough to the story to write her own.
I enjoyed this book and the way the author broke it into parts. The author still left mystery leaving the reader to guess what really happened.
Thank you to Love Books Tour and Charlotte Barnes for the opportunity to read The Things I Didn't Do.
February 15, 2022
This is an interesting take on a psychological thriller and I am a fan of Charlottes books, so jumped at the chance to read an advance copy in exchange for a fair and honest review.
The story is told in three parts.
Erica, a woman accused of murdering her husband, but ultimately acquitted, has decided she has had enough of hiding away and wants her story to be told, so employs a ghost writer, Prudence.
Erica is a strange character, very pedantic, controlling, has to have her own way. Not someone I would spend a lot of time with if I had much choice.
The second part then moves on to Prudence, who wonders if this story is going to be the one that breaks her career open. Despite it basically being the same story, it is not in the least repatitive, and it works well seeing the story from another perspective. I liked Prudence more, she was just a young ambitious woman trying to make her way in the world.
Throughout the story you are wondering if she done it or not, and when you come to the final section where the two stories merge, you get the answer. Perhaps not as revealing or as exciting as i'd normally expect, but it is a fantastic read nonetheless.
There is a steady and palpable sense of tension throughout, something Charlotte excels at in her writing. Its a clever and well executed idea and at no point was I sure of the truth of the matter.
The story is told in three parts.
Erica, a woman accused of murdering her husband, but ultimately acquitted, has decided she has had enough of hiding away and wants her story to be told, so employs a ghost writer, Prudence.
Erica is a strange character, very pedantic, controlling, has to have her own way. Not someone I would spend a lot of time with if I had much choice.
The second part then moves on to Prudence, who wonders if this story is going to be the one that breaks her career open. Despite it basically being the same story, it is not in the least repatitive, and it works well seeing the story from another perspective. I liked Prudence more, she was just a young ambitious woman trying to make her way in the world.
Throughout the story you are wondering if she done it or not, and when you come to the final section where the two stories merge, you get the answer. Perhaps not as revealing or as exciting as i'd normally expect, but it is a fantastic read nonetheless.
There is a steady and palpable sense of tension throughout, something Charlotte excels at in her writing. Its a clever and well executed idea and at no point was I sure of the truth of the matter.
February 14, 2022
An interesting and original book. Written in three parts. Part one from the perspective of Erica Miller, a woman accused and found innocent of murdering her husband. Part two from the perspective of her ghost writer Prudence Carr. And the final part is the conclusion to the tale; did she or didn’t she? As always with this author it is well written and the suspense keeps you hanging right until the end of the book. Both characters have good and bad traits to their personalities; did I like them? Sometimes yes but more often no, I’m not sure I would want either of them as my best friend.
Briefly, after being cleared of the murder of her husband Erica has been living a remote and quiet life under an assumed name. However, she now wants to tell the story from her side; telling things that were never revealed before. When she hires Prue to write her story Prue signs two non disclosure agreements. As the tale unravels the women strike up an uneasy friendship but what secrets are they hiding?
I found this quite a slow burner and although the build up was good I was expecting the ending to have a big reveal but it didn’t. I enjoyed reading the book but for me I think there was something missing. That said do read it for yourself. ⭐️⭐️⭐️💫 rounded up to ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Briefly, after being cleared of the murder of her husband Erica has been living a remote and quiet life under an assumed name. However, she now wants to tell the story from her side; telling things that were never revealed before. When she hires Prue to write her story Prue signs two non disclosure agreements. As the tale unravels the women strike up an uneasy friendship but what secrets are they hiding?
I found this quite a slow burner and although the build up was good I was expecting the ending to have a big reveal but it didn’t. I enjoyed reading the book but for me I think there was something missing. That said do read it for yourself. ⭐️⭐️⭐️💫 rounded up to ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
February 16, 2022
I am a fan of Charlotte Barnes, I like the way she writes and the characters she comes up with. This book is not an exception, I liked the way she presented the characters to us, the readers, and the progression of the complexity of this characters.
The book is presented to us with two points of view, of both the protagonists, Erica and Prue. Which makes reading it much more interesting.
Since very early in the book we know there has been a crime committed decades ago and we even know who the suspect of this crime was, we also know that this suspect, Erica, was tried and acquitted of this crime, but was she really innocent?
Erica hires a ghost writer to write the book of the actual story, according to Erica, to set the record straight. And at the beginning we see this writer, Prue, as a very straightforward person, but when we get to Prue's narrating her POV (point of view), we get to get learn that she is a much more complex character that what you see at simple view.
Both who is telling the truth? And who is being really truth-full?
I enjoyed reading this book but for the ending, for me it felt a little rushed and deflated, after all the psychological tension leading to it I expected a little more of it.
The book is presented to us with two points of view, of both the protagonists, Erica and Prue. Which makes reading it much more interesting.
Since very early in the book we know there has been a crime committed decades ago and we even know who the suspect of this crime was, we also know that this suspect, Erica, was tried and acquitted of this crime, but was she really innocent?
Erica hires a ghost writer to write the book of the actual story, according to Erica, to set the record straight. And at the beginning we see this writer, Prue, as a very straightforward person, but when we get to Prue's narrating her POV (point of view), we get to get learn that she is a much more complex character that what you see at simple view.
Both who is telling the truth? And who is being really truth-full?
I enjoyed reading this book but for the ending, for me it felt a little rushed and deflated, after all the psychological tension leading to it I expected a little more of it.
January 26, 2024
This was promoted as psychological suspense, but I think it is more of a cozy mystery.
Erica Miller has been living a solitary life in the English countryside. It’s been 25 years since she was acquitted of murdering her husband, and now she wants to tell her story. She hires Prudence Carr as a ghostwriter, with quite a few conditions. Pru is to tell Erica’s story as Erica tells it, without any independent research. Pru agrees, and the truth comes out.
The book is told in three parts, beginning with Erica’s side of the story. It’s interesting and keeps you wondering did she do it, or didn’t she do it. Erica’s personality is controlling and judgemental, and she plays psychological games with Pru.
The second part is told from Pru’s side of the story, and here it gets a bit repetitive. It is a replay of the dialog from the first part of the book, but with Pru’s reaction to Erica’s games.
The third part wraps up the aftermath of their relationship and solves the riddle of whodunit.
Overall, the story was engaging. While it was interesting to see Pru’s viewpoint, the repetition of the dialog became uninteresting. There really weren’t any spoilers as it was pretty clear where it was headed, and it became a dull read.
https://candysplanet.wordpress.com/
Erica Miller has been living a solitary life in the English countryside. It’s been 25 years since she was acquitted of murdering her husband, and now she wants to tell her story. She hires Prudence Carr as a ghostwriter, with quite a few conditions. Pru is to tell Erica’s story as Erica tells it, without any independent research. Pru agrees, and the truth comes out.
The book is told in three parts, beginning with Erica’s side of the story. It’s interesting and keeps you wondering did she do it, or didn’t she do it. Erica’s personality is controlling and judgemental, and she plays psychological games with Pru.
The second part is told from Pru’s side of the story, and here it gets a bit repetitive. It is a replay of the dialog from the first part of the book, but with Pru’s reaction to Erica’s games.
The third part wraps up the aftermath of their relationship and solves the riddle of whodunit.
Overall, the story was engaging. While it was interesting to see Pru’s viewpoint, the repetition of the dialog became uninteresting. There really weren’t any spoilers as it was pretty clear where it was headed, and it became a dull read.
https://candysplanet.wordpress.com/
February 2, 2022
I really enjoyed this book. It's told in 2 parts. Part 1 is from the point of view of Prue who is hired tby Erica o write her version of events 25 years after she was acquitted of the murder of her husband. Part 2 is from Prue's perspective.
I liked the contrast in characters. Erica is pedantic and quite prickly really whereas Prue is young and eager to make a name for herself as an author and also relieve herself of some heavy debts. In a lot of books with differing POVs, it's usually done in a 1 chapter , person 1 POV, next chapter , person 2 POV. This time it is basically split in 2 until we get to the end.
I found the tension palpable all through the book and I was hooked throughout. I couldn't make up my mind if she had actually done it or not. As we are told it from Erica's side, you are fed little snippets to whet your appetite. Quite a clever hook really as a reader.
I did find the ending a bit rushed and flat hence the 4 stars, otherwise it would have been a 5 star review from me.
Thanks to Bloodhound Books for an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review.
I liked the contrast in characters. Erica is pedantic and quite prickly really whereas Prue is young and eager to make a name for herself as an author and also relieve herself of some heavy debts. In a lot of books with differing POVs, it's usually done in a 1 chapter , person 1 POV, next chapter , person 2 POV. This time it is basically split in 2 until we get to the end.
I found the tension palpable all through the book and I was hooked throughout. I couldn't make up my mind if she had actually done it or not. As we are told it from Erica's side, you are fed little snippets to whet your appetite. Quite a clever hook really as a reader.
I did find the ending a bit rushed and flat hence the 4 stars, otherwise it would have been a 5 star review from me.
Thanks to Bloodhound Books for an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review.
February 10, 2022
Reviewed in the U.K on 10 February 2022
Thanks Bloodhound Books for the opportunity to read this book before release to review.
The book centre's around the characters of Prue the ghost writer that’s looking for her break and Erica the wife accused of murdering her husband.
Erica employs Prue to write her side of the story and the 2 work together on Ericas memoirs under her demands and rules.
Prue is conflicted between Ericas guilt or innocence and goes against Ericas rules of researching the case from other documentaries told about Erica.
initially found the storyline interesting but the two characters Erica and Prue really didn't hold my attention after the first few chapters. The second half of the book which was from Prue’s perspective really just seemed to mirror the first half.
I was waiting for some jaw dropping moment which never came and it didn’t leave me wondering about did she do it didnt she. I found the ending very weak but stuck with it just to wait for some big shocker which i didn’t get.
Thanks Bloodhound Books for the opportunity to read this book before release to review.
The book centre's around the characters of Prue the ghost writer that’s looking for her break and Erica the wife accused of murdering her husband.
Erica employs Prue to write her side of the story and the 2 work together on Ericas memoirs under her demands and rules.
Prue is conflicted between Ericas guilt or innocence and goes against Ericas rules of researching the case from other documentaries told about Erica.
initially found the storyline interesting but the two characters Erica and Prue really didn't hold my attention after the first few chapters. The second half of the book which was from Prue’s perspective really just seemed to mirror the first half.
I was waiting for some jaw dropping moment which never came and it didn’t leave me wondering about did she do it didnt she. I found the ending very weak but stuck with it just to wait for some big shocker which i didn’t get.
February 14, 2022
You are probably aware of the saying "Two sides to every story" well this book is a definite case of that.
Erica Miller was accused and ultimately cleared of murdering her husband some twenty five years previous and had been hiding away in the country with an assumed name since. She felt that it was time to tell her version of events and hired a ghost writer, Prudence Carr, to write these memoirs making sure a non disclosure agreement was signed so that the story did not leak out before it was intended to.
Written in two parts, the first by Erica, and the second by Prudence, you got both perspectives of the events leading up to the murder. The over- riding question throughout was Erica guilty or not. The suspense is palpable throughout. The teasers were there from the outset and continued throughout the book.
The next big question is would Prudence stick to the story as related to her or would she twist things to launch her own writing career? So many questions but the answers do come!
Thank you to Bloodhound Books for the ARC which I've reviewed voluntarily
Erica Miller was accused and ultimately cleared of murdering her husband some twenty five years previous and had been hiding away in the country with an assumed name since. She felt that it was time to tell her version of events and hired a ghost writer, Prudence Carr, to write these memoirs making sure a non disclosure agreement was signed so that the story did not leak out before it was intended to.
Written in two parts, the first by Erica, and the second by Prudence, you got both perspectives of the events leading up to the murder. The over- riding question throughout was Erica guilty or not. The suspense is palpable throughout. The teasers were there from the outset and continued throughout the book.
The next big question is would Prudence stick to the story as related to her or would she twist things to launch her own writing career? So many questions but the answers do come!
Thank you to Bloodhound Books for the ARC which I've reviewed voluntarily
February 16, 2022
This isn’t the first psychological thriller I’ve read by this author & it certain won’t be the last.
From the outset we are aware that Erica was accused of murdering her husband but not convicted. Through an agency she is put in contact with Prue, a ghost writer, to tell her side of the story, including information not revealed in court or various anniversary documentaries which have been made over the years.
It is obvious that these women have their own reasons to tell this story now. Erica is very controlling & likes things ‘just so’, she also appears to have an ulterior motive to work with Prue. Prue was required to sign two NDAs before meeting Erica, but has already started to do some investigating of her own - strictly against Erica’s stipulations.
Told from two POVs but following the same timeline, the tension gradually builds with a sense of unease & foreboding. It sounds complicated but was very easy to read.
I was left a little flat by the conclusion but this is still a recommended read.
From the outset we are aware that Erica was accused of murdering her husband but not convicted. Through an agency she is put in contact with Prue, a ghost writer, to tell her side of the story, including information not revealed in court or various anniversary documentaries which have been made over the years.
It is obvious that these women have their own reasons to tell this story now. Erica is very controlling & likes things ‘just so’, she also appears to have an ulterior motive to work with Prue. Prue was required to sign two NDAs before meeting Erica, but has already started to do some investigating of her own - strictly against Erica’s stipulations.
Told from two POVs but following the same timeline, the tension gradually builds with a sense of unease & foreboding. It sounds complicated but was very easy to read.
I was left a little flat by the conclusion but this is still a recommended read.
February 15, 2022
The things I didn't do by Charlotte Barnes.
After twenty-five years in the remote English countryside, living under an assumed name, Erica Miller has decided it’s time for the world to hear her story—from her point of view, rather than from the tabloids or the gossips who think she got away with murder.She hires Prudence Carr to write about her privileged childhood, her marriage, the affairs, the day her husband disappeared, and the day his body was found in the marshes. Despite evidence against her, the jury refused to convict, leaving Erica to live a life of quiet isolation.Erica has a lot to say. But as the story unfolds, so does Prudence. It is clear that this project could make Prudence’s career. In this compelling novel of mystery and deceit, everything will depend on who gets the last word . . .
This was a really enjoyable read. I do like this author. Erica was my favourite. 4*.
After twenty-five years in the remote English countryside, living under an assumed name, Erica Miller has decided it’s time for the world to hear her story—from her point of view, rather than from the tabloids or the gossips who think she got away with murder.She hires Prudence Carr to write about her privileged childhood, her marriage, the affairs, the day her husband disappeared, and the day his body was found in the marshes. Despite evidence against her, the jury refused to convict, leaving Erica to live a life of quiet isolation.Erica has a lot to say. But as the story unfolds, so does Prudence. It is clear that this project could make Prudence’s career. In this compelling novel of mystery and deceit, everything will depend on who gets the last word . . .
This was a really enjoyable read. I do like this author. Erica was my favourite. 4*.
February 3, 2022
I really enjoyed the way this story was told in two halves. Firstly by Erica , telling Prue, her ghost writer, about her husband Roger’s murder. Erica was very believable and I was intrigued to hear the story as it was unfolding. Suddenly, the story was being retold from Prue’s point of view. With Prue deviously investigating the background of the murder, despite Erica telling her this was not going to be allowed.
Throughout the book , I was questioning ‘ did she kill Roger ‘ .
The ending , when it was revealed, was too sudden and I was left feeling rather flat. In a way , I then had more unanswered questions . What was Erica’s purpose in having the story published?
Thank you Bloodhound books for providing the arc . It was very enjoyable and I will definitely read more of this author.
Throughout the book , I was questioning ‘ did she kill Roger ‘ .
The ending , when it was revealed, was too sudden and I was left feeling rather flat. In a way , I then had more unanswered questions . What was Erica’s purpose in having the story published?
Thank you Bloodhound books for providing the arc . It was very enjoyable and I will definitely read more of this author.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 88 reviews