Disinformation by Donald A. Barclay gives a broad overview of the nature of disinformation in the modern age.
Thoughts while reading:
-it begins with an overview of philosophy and the concept of Truth
-the book then goes on to talk about the fallibility of memory, as well as the multiple cognitive biases that people suffer, however, like the first chapter it is a broad overview that doesn't go into much depth
-hearing about the history of the internet was mildly interesting. I’ve heard some anecdotes about how different internet culture used to be and it’s a little sad how it started with academics, only to turn into an environment fostering anti-intellecutalism
-The idea of a secondary oral culture that we’re moving into is an interesting one, but once again, the author doesn’t really go in much depth about it. It’s the idea of how rather than using the written word to impart ideas, we’re using other media like video or short form-messages like texts and tweets.
-I also like that the author addresses the idea that there is much less gatekeeping of information (the way a university library would be gatekept, for example). If anyone can say anything, it makes it much harder to find credible information
-It was a little interesting to learn about how copyright works, and finding the balance between a creator protecting their works, vs corporations protecting their works
-There was some helpful insight about the different types of propaganda (eg white, grey, black propaganda), and how people have a lot of misunderstandings about how it works
-It was interesting to hear about the differences between conspiracies and conspiracy theories, and why the latter aren’t valid (basically due to disregarding evidence or explanations). I also liked that the author pointed out that by choosing to believe one thing, you are deliberately choosing not to believe another (eg believing conspiracies means deliberately disregarding evidence, it’s not necessarily just a harmless action)
I found the book didn't go into sufficient depth to really captivate me. It felt like a good overview if someone just wanted a superficial look at various aspects related to disinformation but I couldn't help wishing for a deeper dive. I would give the book a 3 out of 5