By author Howard Yaruss’s own admission the original title was “Economics for Activists”, which is a more appropriate title given that much of this book is about addressing social inequality and seeking more government intervention, regulation, and wealth redistribution. Topics include GDP, what money is and isn’t (with some discussion about cryptocurrencies), and global trade, though a lot of the subject matter is described in very rudimentary (read: crude) terms. To be fair, some of the information was informative - specifically the workings of the Fed and Monetary Policy (i.e., Open Market Operations). I also appreciated Mr. Yaruss’s statement that the public should pay more attention to who POTUS appoints (and the Senate confirms) to the Fed’s board of governors. Where the book falls short is the insertion of political biases and desire for activism, which would have been fine if Mr. Yaruss stuck with his original title. Little, and sometimes no alternative viewpoints are presented besides some nebulous exaltation for capitalism over socialism. For example, corporations are caricatured as rapacious villains and their role in society is viewed through the lens of oppressor vs. oppressed; there is no discussion about the role of the corporation in allowing smaller investors to get theirs by pooling resources, or how the dilution of risk (and limitation on personal liability) has promoted innovation, increased productivity, and improved the quality of life for everyone. In other words, this book is not meant to teach so much as it is to advocate for progressive policy. Mr. Yaruss also appears to be a strong proponent of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), most specifically that the government pull whatever levers it can to increase the money supply and to spend freely - with the only limiting factor being the specter of hyperinflation. The most glaring omission of the book (for me) is that there is no discussion about tradeoffs and second order effects, which imho, is the most important component that any book on basic economics should discuss.