What do you think?


The Mars Quartet: Four Seminars on the Astrology of the Red Planet
This work presents the transcripts of four seminars on Mars given at the Centre for Psychological in London.
- GenresAstrology
350 pages, Paperback
First published December 15, 2001
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
June 9, 2013
There are four authors talking/writing (they are edited transcripts of seminars given by the various authors) about Mars. The first two were okay, nothing to get excited about. Liz Greene’s chapter on Mars was phenomenal as are most of her books. I have a new respect and perspective on Mars after reading Liz’s insightful and psychological take on it. There is also a chapter from Liz written write after Sept 11 and she discusses the Sep 11 transit chart. I am in middle of reading it and will update what I thought of it.
Overall this book gets 4 stars primarily because of the Liz Green chapter on Mars that I believe is so valuable that it’s worth buying/reading the book, just for that chapter.
Overall this book gets 4 stars primarily because of the Liz Green chapter on Mars that I believe is so valuable that it’s worth buying/reading the book, just for that chapter.
December 2, 2019
Cuatro visiones de Marte completamente distintas pero totalmente complementarias. Marte y todas sus asociaciones vistas en profundidad, partiendo del terrible acontecimiento del 11-S. Recomendable para interesados en el tema.
June 12, 2022
3,5.
Claramente la charla de Liz Greene y Melanie Reinhart destacan. La de Lynn Bell me gustó, pero me parece que la de Darby Costello está de más.
Claramente la charla de Liz Greene y Melanie Reinhart destacan. La de Lynn Bell me gustó, pero me parece que la de Darby Costello está de más.
September 4, 2008
Four papers on the Mars archetype. A good chance to delve into and think about our own Marial energy, how it's useful, troublesome, etc. Always impressed by the quality of thinking in the CPA school, but a little disappointed with two of the papers.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews




