"Darwin’s ideas ‘taught that if there is this kinship physically between all living creatures, surely a responsibility rests upon us to see that these creatures, who have nerves as we have, who are made of the same flesh and blood as we are, who have minds differing from ours not in kind but in degree, should be protected, as far as in our power lies, from ill-treatment, cruelty and abuse of every kind." Emilie Lind-af-Hageby, an early advocate for animal rights.
That dogs feel love like we do is no longer an outlier’s opinion. That their hearts don’t beat like ours, that their brains don’t light up like ours, or that the warmth you give them is unlike the warmth they give back – opinions like these are now, after 150 years of scientific reasoning, drifting out of the mainstream.
I felt this was more about the history of dogs rather than the science but there was both. There were a lot of psychological studies mentioned that have been replicated and thought to be accurate, and then neuroscience looks at them through a different lens and they are now debunked. I had a class with Martin Seligman, the originator of learned helplessness from dogs, and neuroscience has interpreted it differently, yet it is used in here as fact. The brain may have a default state of helplessness that the studies may have just strengthened, and in truth it is instinctive helplessness that has to be overcome, more like a learned strength. And that may also be studied differently in ages to come.
I think all these studies give us a window into possibilities to help us understand and help people, but the more you try to put brains, people, instincts in boxes the more you start to obscure the truth. Fight or flight has been amended to add “tend and befriend” and yet people still subscribe to old beliefs. Survival of the fittest was misunderstood and continues to be used improperly.
There was good information on the dog alpha male theory debunking:
There is a deep flaw in this philosophy, which is that the ideas around ‘alpha males’ in wolf packs are somewhat bunkum. Misjudged. That is, according to many modern-day scientists. Alphas, as Schenkel viewed them, do not exist. His were captive wolves thrown in with one another, many unrelated to one another, kept in an enclosure at Switzerland’s Zoo Basel. Schenkel’s wolves were behaving as captive animals often do: unpredictably. No wonder they fought. They were placed in cages with unrelated family members, causing social disarray. In short, it was anything but the wolf’s natural environment. When scientists realised this decades later, by studying wild populations of wolves, it was too late. The ideas of dominance theory – of alpha males, of top dogs – had washed into society and could not easily be erased.
That, to a degree, my education misled me. I think education is still like this. A quick search online for learning resources about Pavlov and his discovery of classical conditioning shows a surprising number of slides and print-outs of cartoon dogs, pictured with smiles, sitting respectfully in front of clip-art renderings of bells, with arrows pointing out the gathering saliva. Some of these learning resources are from very respected universities. I remember images on slides just like these when I was at university. I think this is why I never thought much more about the dogs. Perhaps I was, myself, conditioned. The truth is that their untold suffering – and it really was nothing less than that – was, in no small way, a fledgling science’s gain. And so it is right that we remember those dogs whose names we know, even if we know little about their characters, temperaments and experiences. Especially if it helps us vow never again to make such easy slaves of their desperate interest in connection
Take a moment, if you can, to glance over at a nearby dog. Think about what you share in common. Take in the up–down jaws of their skull. The paired nostrils and ears. The in–out mechanism of the breathing. Look at the muscular tongue. Notice their eyes looking back at you. Look at the intensity, shining back. The interest. Gaze into their pupils. Take in the eyelashes. If you’re lucky, you might share a smile.
Now, if you can, lean in for a stroke. Feel the bones in the legs first. Notice the arrangement and how they mirror those in your own limb bones. Start with the heavy bones at the top of the legs: the humerus (forelegs) and femur (hindlegs). Work your way down to the paired bones that connect to them: the ulna and radius in the forelegs and the fibula and tibia in the hindlegs. As with your own, these bones have within them both yellow and red bone marrow. They are factories that produce blood cells and maintain the body. They are what keeps your dog alive.
Move onwards. Run your fingers down your dog’s neck, feeling for the seven neck vertebrae that nearly all mammals possess. Then move your hands lower and guide them in the channel between the shoulder blades (scapulae – again, you have them) and down the spine. Put your hand in front of its mouth now. Feel its muscular tongue give you a loving lick. Observe the arrangement of the teeth – the incisors, the canines, the molars. Like yours, these are likely to be adult teeth; its milk teeth were lost long ago, probably swallowed while eating. Finally, go paw to paw. Feel with your digits, the digits of your dog. The same familiar arrangement, with dewclaw as thumb.
‘In the agony of death a dog has been known to caress his master and everyone has heard of the dog suffering under vivisection who licked the hand of the operator; this man, unless the operation was fully justified by an increase of our knowledge, or unless he had a heart of stone, must have felt remorse to the last hour of his life.’ – Charles Darwin (1871)
In the last 200 years, for instance, the number of dog breeds has seen a dramatic increase, from just fifteen or so known breeds in Britain at the start of the nineteenth century to almost sixty at the end. Today, there are estimated to be more than 400 breeds across the world All of this breed diversity in dogs has taken fewer than 5,000 years to come about, through selective breeding by humans, who consciously or unconsciously were acting in the same way that Darwin imagined, encouraging the breeding of desired traits, rewarding with reproductive opportunities the dogs best at hunting, chasing, pointing, guarding, fighting, digging – in other words, artificially selecting the dogs best up to the job.