Exodus had a lot going for it at the beginning, since the first twenty or so chapters played out as a single, contiguous story with no glaring self-contradictions, unlike Genesis, which clashed with its own words on the regular. The back half of the book, however, became a real slog in quite the opposite way as Genesis. Where Genesis couldn't keep its story straight, Exodus definitely does, by laying out several chapters of rules for the descendents of Abraham to follow, often to an excruciating level of detail, and then repeating those rules - usually in the same exact language - over several more chapters as the characters execute them. Really, from about Chapter 21 onward, this book lost a ton of favor with me. And while this section repeats itself thoroughly and consistently, it also serves as a giant contradiction to the first half.
There are also some oddities. As a person born into Catholicism but who drifted away as critical thought took hold, I'm particularly interested in all the stories in the Bible that were not told to us as children and in church. Exodus begins with one such story in the second chapter in which Moses outright murders an Egyptian for "smiting an Hebrew". Normally I wind up a little irked by these stories because of the way they gloss over horrible things with no critical thought (like the childish way the Noah's Ark story gets told to children, focusing on garish drawings of cute animals living on a boat in harmony and ignoring the fact that God is committing global, multi-species genocide to no apparent positive effect and requiring incest for the continuation of all species), but this was a case where I thought the nasty bit helped the story out. It establishes Moses early on as a person who isn't going to put up with the abuse the Egyptians are exerting on the Hebrews.
That said, the back half of the book - the part with all the laws handed down by God - winds up endorsing slavery in quite thorough, specific ways. Chapter 21:2-11 clearly describe the ways in which human chattel are to be treated. They must work in slavery for six years before being set free in the seventh (and this work-six-rest-seven pattern is very common throughout these laws, often being attributed to the contradicting six day creation stories from Genesis). If the slave is married, his wife gets to leave, too. But not if the wife had kids; then the wife and the kids both still belong to the slavemaster. The slave can choose to remain in slavery, too, if they want, and if that happens and "the judges" agree, he gets a shiny gold earring and becomes the slavemaster's property forever, no take backs. Female servants are not granted the rights of freedom that male servants are. So this does end up being a bit of a contradiction as well. God doesn't like it when Hebrews are made to be slaves and is willing to do a lot to free them from slavery, but he's totally fine if the Hebrews take each other to be slaves, and establishes a full set of rules to govern that slavery.
While we're on the subject of morality, this is a fine time to bring up the ten commandments. Interestingly, these get dropped in Chapter 20, but don't get referred to as "the ten commandments" until Chapter 34. Also interestingly, these aren't immediately identifiable as "the ten commandments" because they're surrounded by literally hundreds of other commandments. Most of the other commandments are extremely self-aggrandizing. They involve unbelievably minute details of how to build and decorate a tabernacle and an ark and how to place the ark in the tabernacle (it goes on, and I'll circle back to it).
But the Big Ten... Well, they're mostly not the moral guidepost they're made out to be. The first four are all about worshipping God and make no moral statements whatsoever. Don't make any "graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above" (a commandment which the Rennaissance painters routinely violated, as well as the baroque artists that the Inquisition was so fond of). Don't serve any other gods (one of a number of passages in the Old Testament where God acknowledges he's not the only god). Don't "take the name of the LORD thy God in vain". Keep holy the sabbath.
The fifth could be construed as a moral statement - "Honour thy father and thy mother" - although I think anybody thinking critically would put caveats on that. Some parents are not worth honoring. A small bevy of pretty agreeable moral codes come next - don't kill, don't commit adultery, don't steal, don't be a dick to your neighbors - but the tenth is one I take some umbrage with. "Thou shalt not covet" various things is a thought crime, and not something anyone should be held accountable for.
As I said before, this is followed by an enormous list of other commandments that runs - no joke - all the way through the end of Chapter 31. Among these commandments are the rules of slavery mentioned earlier, nine full verses on how to deal with atrocities commited by oxen, and many entire chapters on how to deck out a tabernacle. That tabernacle is bedecked in gold, by the way, and jewels, and fine linens of various colors with gold woven through them. It's very extravagant, very ostentatious, and will be directly contradicted in the New Testament when Jesus tells us rich people are bastards. After all of these very specific, very intricate, very boring rules are relayed to Moses, he goes and tells all his people about them, and they go and build the ark and tabernacle. This information is relayed to the reader with a chapters-long copy-paste of the previous several chapters. This was an almost unbearable portion of the book to read, and had a lot to do with this getting a two-star rating instead of a three-star rating.
There are some other oddities scattered throughout the book. In Exodus 4:22-25, we get a weird thing where Moses, who has grown up as an Egyptian and is just now discovering his Hebrew heritage, realizes his son (by an Egyptian mother named Zipporah) isn't circumcised. "Then Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son, and cast it at his feet, and said, Surely a bloody husband art thou to me." I can completely relate to Zipporah here because I do not understand this lust for foreskin the God character has. Male circumcision, being completely unnecessary from a medical and biological point of view, is pretty nasty to begin with, but doing it with bronze age technology - a sharp stone - is fucking brutal. I don't want to gloss over how completely disgusting this demand for foreskins is. Nevertheless, it's of utmost importance to these people, and not apparently for issues of cleanliness. Moses here is worried that Pharoah won't pay any attention to his pleas for his people's freedom because he is uncircumcised himself, and therefore not obviously Hebrew.
Circumcision is not the only gross thing crossing the Genesis-Exodus barrier. Moses is the son of his father and his father's aunt, so there's that whole incest thing again.
Anyway, I did mention that the first half of the book was actually pretty compelling, and I mostly enjoyed it. It's a pretty classic tale that's been retold in a number of different settings ever since. Moses is sent away from his Hebrew home as an infant to be found and raised by Egyptian enslavers. He grows up to rediscover his origins and becomes a speaker for his people. With supernatural help from beyond the tangible world, he leads his people to freedom. Good stuff.
But I don't understand much of God's motivations throughout this part, which kind of tempered my enjoyment of it. God outright says he wants to help Moses, but he also prevents Moses from achieving his goal many times over. He begins by having Moses compete with Pharoah's court magicians (weird) with things like turning a staff into a snake and back again and turning a river into blood, then keeps inflicting various sufferings upon Pharoah and the Egyptians - plagues and flaming hail and the destruction of crops. Each one should be convincing or humbling, and God even acknowledges that, but each time, God "hardens Pharoah's heart". This indicates to me that God is unnecessarily escalating things, punishing Pharoah for actions he makes Pharoah commit.
The final blow involves God killing everyone's firstborn son except for those of the Hebrews who slaughter a lamb and paint lamb's blood on the posts and tops of their front door, again perpetuating this blood sacrifice. God loves bloodshed in his name, flesh burned in his name, foreskins excised with sharp stones in his name, extravagances built in his name. And he pays it back in death. The Red Sea is parted so that Moses and his Hebrews can cross it, but Pharoah's army's chariots are destroyed in the middle, and the waters closed down upon them, killing scores of men in a violent drowning.
But now the Hebrew people are lost in the middle east with limited supplies, and they wonder how they're going to survive with no food in the desert. Thus begins what is easily my favorite part of this book, and something that was never once read to me as a kid. In a perfect fantasy story scenario, God drops "manna" on the ground every morning (except for the sabbath). It's a thin, flaky, breadlike substance that sustains the Hebrews for quite some time. They eat their fill every morning, and the rest of it rots and disappears by the end of the day. On the day before the sabbath (the sixth day), the manna that falls is enough for two days' sustenance and does not rot until the end of the sabbath. I got this amazing visual in my head of these people waking up in the morning to find a magical bready dew covering the ground. It's the most perfect visual I've gotten while reading the Bible so far, due in large part to how terse most of the language is. This is the first case where something is described in more than half a sentence's detail.
Moses and his brother Aaron (who does most of the talking for Moses, who, by his own admission, is "ineloquent" and "slow of speech, and of a slow tongue"), convene with God a few times, but when the ten commandments are given on Mount Sinai, Aaron is back at the Hebrew camp going along with everyone's plan to defy God and build a golden calf to worship. God doesn't really punish them for this because Moses delivers the word of God to them, and they shape up pretty quick.
However, having just said, "Thou shalt not kill," God almost immediately instructs the Hebrews to go and kill people of other tribes. In 32:37, God says, "Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Put every man his sword by his side, and go in and out from gate to gate throughout the camp, and slay every man his brother, and every man his companion, and every man his neighbor." So there's that contradiction again. Yes, this is twelve chapters after "Thou shalt not kill" but in terms of chronology, it's pretty immediate; most of the intervening chapters are just God rattling off orders. Some of the stranger and more oddly specific things to note in this section are...
* Altars are to be "unhewn" and made of single pieces of stone or wood. To "hew" the altar is to "pollute" it.
* One is not to approach an altar by walking up stairs to it (which is how things are laid out in literally every church I've ever been in) because that might expose one's genitals to God.
* You can beat your servants, but don't kill them. If you kill them, God will punish you. But if you beat them and they survive two days, you're all good.
* If you beat a pregnant woman and she miscarries, you're in trouble.
* You have to marry any unmarried woman you have sex with.
* "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."
* "Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death."
I feel like I'm going on forever about crazy laws, but that's fair because there are twenty whole chapters about it. Regarding the tabernacle, here are a few of the many, many, many rules around building it and decorating it.
* There should be a table made of shittim wood (almost everything is made with shittim wood), two cubits by one cubit by one and a half cubits, and "thou shalt overlay it with pure gold" (almost all of the wood is covered or bordered in gold). There should be gold rings on almost everything as well.
* There should be a candlestick made of a single chunk of gold, and there should be four bowls on the candlestick with "a knop under two branches of the same, and a knop under two branches of the same, and a knop under two branches of the same, according to the six branches that proceed out of the candlestick." I believe this is describing what we now call a menorah.
* "And thou shalt make loops of blue upon the edge of the one curtain from the selvedge in the coupling..."
This sort of thing goes on for chapter after chapter after chapter, and completely turned me off. Eventually, it ends with the people building the ark of the testimony (called the ark of the covenant in some printings and in popular culture) and the tabernacle of the testimony. In a sense, it's a good ending to the book because the main conflict is resolved and it's a happy ending, more or less. It just takes way too long to get there. This was worse than reading Tolkein.
I want to close this review out by talking about the truth of the story. This is only important to me because people make truth claims about this story. There are ongoing conflicts in the middle east today that have spawned from the notion of the enslavement of the Hebrews in Egypt and whether the land they left it for is "theirs" in any meaningful way.
It seems that basically nothing in this story is actually verifiable, though. Archaeologists have searched for centuries trying to find evidence of Hebrews wandering around Egypt, to no avail. Nobody has ever discovered the tabernacle of the testimony, despite the story telling of how it's built with some very notable features and a shitload of solid gold. The ark of the covenant has never been located. The best we've gotten is "some people in Somalia say they have it, but won't let anyone see it". And if nobody's allowed to see it, then it can't be verified, and let's be honest, it's probably not the ark of the covenant.
I'm not overly concerned with the truth of this as far as my reading of it and rating and general enjoyment of it... But let's just get it out of the way... It's probably not a true story. It appears to be completely unsubstantiated. Ultimately, I'll recommend the first half of Exodus to people; it's a pretty good read. But you really have to ignore a good chunk of it to be able to say that.