A very interesting book on a people where the records are not definitively, let alone conclusively clear.
The Phoenicians are a people who initially, did not want to settle in a particular area which would in turn, historically invites attack. Yet, they still needed to be land-based (mainly in Tyre) to facilitate and grow what they were good at: trade, by sea. Consequently, they were known to be a ‘sea people.’ A hallmark of that trade was the purple dye, derived from snails which were a prized item on the trading market as purple is not color that is easily derived nor manufactured, along with their acumen to efficiently build and sail innovative ships at a time when most of their neighbors has no navies. The Phoenicians’ trading range was from Spain throughout the Mediterranean, North Africa to the Middle East. Later, in the book, it is outlined that the Phoenicians were also familiar with the course of West Africa long before the Europeans were, but that information ‘died’ with the Phoenicians.
However, the book outlines the inevitability in that what one is good at, there is bound to be subsequent envy. First, it was early peoples (Babylon and Assyria), then the Greeks and ultimately, the Romans, who wanted to build its empire; preside over, and control all resources. By that time, the Phoenicians were already at their decline: their trading wares were not the same (trees were long felled) and the allegiances from the early peoples who envied them, were shifting and changing – people sought allegiances out of convenience and/or protection from the growing Greek, Carthage, then Roman empire. However, the Phoenicians maintained their engineering prowess in dams and ships. Still, it does not take long for one’s enemies to understand and surpass one’s prowess in an area, and ultimately exploit and defeat it. The last chapters on Hannibal and his family in his impossible, yet fantastic feat to beat the Romans on their own turf is an illustration of resilience and resolve. Nevertheless, with the defeat of Hannibal, the Phoenicians’ time on the world stage ended …
… and by then, the Romans realized that what they did to the Phoenicians would ultimately consume them as well. In a world of decadence, the price for that decadence is the exhaustion of the resources that one wants to control in order to reinforce its prowess, with the expense to reinforce that prowess, over time and ultimately, exhausts and undermines the pillars of that prowess. Innately, the Romans knew, but often ignored, the realization that conquered/occupied people(s) soon learn to the worldview and technologies used to control the resources and peoples, and ultimately, in turn, revolt against the empire. The ultimate clash, determines who is remembered and how, and who is forgotten. That is the paradox of the Phoenicians: the sea people who didn’t want to incite envy, let alone subsequent attack, being good at something and nevertheless, attracting envy and political/social intrigue, to in turn, be attacked and undermined by growing kingdoms; being still, ‘remembered’ but barely, with what they left behind by those who envied and conquered them.