Jump to ratings and reviews

Critical Phenomenology: An Introduction

Phenomenology is one of the leading movements in twentieth-century philosophy and continues to exert a strong influence on many contemporary philosophical traditions and investigations. In recent years, phenomenological insights have been increasingly developed in relation to philosophy of illness, disability, race, gender, sexuality, and politics, leading to the emergence of critical phenomenology as a new, prominent field for interdisciplinary research.

Magrì and McQueen's Critical An Introduction is the first book of its kind, addressing the critical questions at the core of both classical and contemporary phenomenology. This book provides a concise, accessible introduction to key areas of phenomenological research, such as intersubjectivity, bodily experience, race, gender, social experience, and political action. In doing so, it demonstrates both the rich history of phenomenology and its continuing philosophical and ethical importance.

This textbook will be essential reading for undergraduate philosophy students and academics interested in critical phenomenology.

254 pages, Kindle Edition

Published October 11, 2022

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Elisa Magri

9 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
2 (25%)
4 stars
3 (37%)
3 stars
2 (25%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (12%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Jay Green.
Author 5 books274 followers
November 17, 2024
An excellent introduction to a highly topical field.
Profile Image for Jiho Burrows.
63 reviews2 followers
August 15, 2026
This book is so fucking bad. It's so ironic that they constantly attempt to carve out clear boundaries between critical and classical phenomology when classical phenomologist were actually attempting to overcome the given neutrality of liberalism. At the same time, the authors clearly accept Ardent without any reflection of her philosophy. Come on man, she thought the American revolution was the best of all time, even though by definition it was reactionary. How is it possible that Ardent can be taken as a phenomologist, even though she never was, and also that primary critique against Sartre, when she was literally worse than him on literally everything? News flash, it's cause she's a liberal ideologue! What a fucking joke.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews