What do you think?
Rate this book


388 pages, Kindle Edition
First published May 10, 2022
Militarism was not a foregone conclusion. It was an ideology forged in the rush to lift Japan out of its unequal treaties, and to secure a "cordon of interest" beyond its historical borders.
Japanese inevitably tended to regard international relations as tests of strength decided by superior power; concepts of the equality of nations or of international justice were not thought important (efforts to revise the unequal treaties imposed by the West owed little to such idealistic notions). Japan uncritically followed the prevailing amoral code of “might makes right” among nation-states.
[Ishiwara] represents the systematic formulation of an irrational Japanese contempt for their Asian neighbors fostered over several decades and the imperialist policies sanctioned by that attitude. As long as that mentality and policy were dominant, a military confrontation was unavoidable with a China which sought a new national identity and had begun to resist imperialist domination. Why were the Japanese people intolerant of Chinese and Koreans? Why did they lack the capacity for critical analysis of imperialist policies and the wars they bred? I think the answer lies in the state’s manipulation of information and values to produce mass conformity and unquestioning obedience.