Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality

Rate this book
How are boundaries created between groups in society? And what do these boundaries have to do with social inequality?

In this pioneering collection of original essays, a group of leading scholars helps set the agenda for the sociology of culture by exploring the factors that push us to segregate and integrate and the institutional arrangements that shape classification systems. Each examines the power of culture to shape our everyday lives as clearly as does economics, and studies the dimensions along which boundaries are frequently drawn.

The essays cover four topic the institutionalization of cultural categories, from morality to popular culture; the exclusionary effects of high culture, from musical tastes to the role of art museums; the role of ethnicity and gender in shaping symbolic boundaries; and the role of democracy in creating inclusion and exclusion.

The contributors are Jeffrey Alexander, Nicola Beisel, Randall Collins, Diana Crane, Paul DiMaggio, Cynthia Fuchs Epstein, Joseph Gusfield, John R. Hall, David Halle, Richard A. Peterson, Albert Simkus, Alan Wolfe, and Vera Zolberg.

364 pages, Paperback

First published January 15, 1992

1 person is currently reading
74 people want to read

About the author

Michèle Lamont

21 books32 followers
Michèle Lamont is the Robert I. Goldman Professor of European Studies and professor of sociology and African and Africa American Studies at Harvard University.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (9%)
4 stars
7 (63%)
3 stars
3 (27%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Titus Hjelm.
Author 18 books100 followers
April 1, 2014
A collection of high-profile American sociologists mainly in dialogue with Pierre Bourdieu's theory of Distinction. John Hall's chapter is the leading theoretical dialogue in the book. The rest is, ultimately, disappointing. There are good chapters by Jeff Alexander and Alan Wolfe, but they have little to do with the rest of the book. Most chapters are American case studies in the sociology of art, with some discussion on gender thrown in. In other words, too disparate a collection despite the unifying topic of boundary.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.