“In the sermon Martin Luther King had delivered to his congregation at the Dexter Avenue church a day earlier, he had discussed what he referred to as ‘this bus situation’. He related a conversation he’d had in which a man ‘discussed the peace being destroyed in the community, the destroying of good race relations. I agree that it is more tension now, but peace is not merely the absence of tension, but the presence of justice.... It is true if the Negro accepts his place, accepts exploitation and injustice, there will be peace...and if peace means this, I don’t want peace.’”
“A reporter driving downtown wrote of picking up an elderly woman walking to her job and asking her why, at her age, she was participating in the protest. ‘I am not walking for myself’, the woman replied, ‘I am walking for the young people coming on behind me.’”
If one takes a cursory look at the title of this book, they’d assume that Martin Luther King being the man on trial, is at the center of this story.
Yet in fact, as with much of the Civil Rights era, King played an important part as the face of movement, but so much work was also done by those history doesn’t remember as well.
Here we have defense attorney Fred Gray, at the time of the trial one of only 2 lawyers in the state of Alabama. Claudette Colvin, the black teenager who refused to give up her seat on the bus, predating the better known Rosa Parks. And perhaps most importantly, thousands of ordinary black men and women who for one year refused to ride Montgomery city buses in protest of the humiliating day to day treatment they were subjected to.
As this book primarily deals with the trial of Dr. King, we are exposed to the testimony from these black men and women as to what they had to endure.
Perhaps we all imagine what indignities they were forced to suffer but actually reading their first hand accounts is sobering reading.
In addition to a barrage of insults from white passengers and bus drivers, blacks would enter the bus, pay their fare, and then be forced to exit the bus and enter from the back.
Those that agreed to that humiliation would often find as they reached the back door that the driver would then suddenly pull the bus away, leaving them stranded and more frustrated than before.
This perhaps is nothing compared to the physical abuse of bus drivers who would grab, kick, and close the doors on black passengers exiting the bus.
The courage these everyday people showed in testifying at King’s trial is in and of itself worthy of respect but that so many of them, often poorly educated, also knew enough to deflect, obfuscate, and mislead in their answer to prosecutors seeking to link King to the bus boycott:
witness: ‘The persons drove cars and used the gas’, Erna Dungee responded.
prosecutor: ‘Persons driving?’
witness:‘That drove the people’.
prosecutor: Several paid men?’
witness:‘That is all right.’
prosecutor: ‘Who are they?’
witness:‘Persons who burned the gas.’
“After trying unsuccessfully to find out all the people who served with Lewis, the prosecutor asked, ‘What has the transportation committee done in reference to transportation?’. Lewis could barely believe the question. The answer seemed so obvious he repeated it as if to confirm he’d heard it correctly. ‘What has the transportation committee done in reference to transportation?’.
‘That’s right’.
He responded with the only possible answer. ‘We transported people’.”
It all makes for highly compelling reading (King would eventually be convicted and fined after a lengthy appeal, which he paid) of a seismic moment in America’s history.
Much like with most of the segregated South in this period, whites would reject compromise in favor of blunt force. Force that in the face of the love and magnanimity of the Civil Rights movement, would invariably turn against them as they lost the hearts and minds of their cities, states, and the world.