The intriguing title got my attention as I always wondered with this question . The state with an envious kitty of Prime ministers , Home ministers , Union leaders , Peasant leaders etc still counts as one of the backward states of the country . With 1/6th of Bharat’s population third among it being below 30 , UP holds tremendous potential to lead 21st centuries India’s growth story but the catch is why it hasn’t so far . The book tries to dwell on this question.
The road to Delhi passes through Lucknow. With 80 MP’s Uttarpradesh holds the key to the Delhi Durbar. The author stresses on this point and raises the question of its under development even being a power house . The Indian leaders who rose to the prominence in the center have always tried to improve their home bastions . The likes of Lalu Prasad Yadav and Mamata Banerjee when as Railway minsters greatly improved railway infrastructures in their home bastions . Then why UP being the crucible of India’s greatest Prime ministers could do the same for itself .
In my opinion the key to the power is itself its biggest disadvantage . So important is this key that everyone tried to steal it in every possible way . And with it comes the interference from Lutyens as UP is so important that everyone wanted to meddle in leaving little room for federalism to prosper and contribute to its development . Too many cooks literally spoil the food and it happened so in UP. Before 2007 , there was never a full term Chief Minister in UP’s post independent history speaks volumes about this meddling .
The land of Ganga-Yamuna , the cradle of Indian Civilisation and its numerous empires is today a part of BIMARU states . The state is an example of mis-governance playing havoc with the socio-economic profile of the state and the society . With all the hall bulla of technological development and technology being shown as a panacea for every problem , the UP example shows that Governance and right Politics is the key .
UP being so important in electoral politics every kind of mobilisation in terms of caste , communal , crime was testing in this electoral laboratory and it had to face the brunt of its harmful byproduct’s . The economic reforms of 1991 which paved for the transformation in states like Karnataka , A.P could do so in UP because of its unstable polity . The period between 1995 to 2000 saw 5 chief ministers in UP.
The economic reforms of 1991 also brought in many new changes and forced Indian farmers , small and medium scale industries to global competition which many could not withstand . What was required in this period was right policies to make best use of the reforms and protect the vulnerable with government support . Too involved in the musical chairs of power tussles , the UP polity could not give enough attention to the basic needs of its people and faced the biggest brunt of negative fallout of liberalisation . Rather than just missing the bus it went under the bus .
The caste and criminalisation of politics is not just an outcome of under development but also its very cause . The polity not just supported the criminals but also used them pawns for power . The fundamental necessity for economy to take and society to prosper and grow is the law and order . And it is this which took a back seat with kidnappings and killings . Naturally the ecosystem for business suffered . Even the initiatives at the level of Prime minsters to develop manufacturing and industries suffered as the favourable ecosystem for business to prosper was absent . The forced industrialisation died with the leader or his electoral reverses . The closed industrial shutters in Amethi , Rae Bareli are a telling example of the same .
The analysis of reasons behind the UP’s under-development shows the lessons and scope for its development strategy . With 1/3rd of population below 30 , falling fertility levels shows that UP is in a demographic transition suitably placed for reaping the fruits of demographic dividend . The stable polities in the last 15 years provides the hope . The year 2021 showed the promise with the lowest unemployment levels . Now the governance and the polity has to gear up to maximise the UP’s potential .
UP’s electoral strength and its geographical closeness to Delhi which are its weaknesses more than strength . The humongous state with regions : Harit Pradesh , Bundelkhand , Baghelkhand , Purvanchal , central UP is diverse in terms of its population , development , geography etc making governance difficult . The uniform policies for all the regions is definitely not advisable . The very geography makes the governance difficult for Lucknow. So there is a strong case for division and reorganisation of UP .
UP is too important for 21st century India’s growth and development and ignoring this fact will be a catastrophe .