“Rachel” is not a play that is necessarily known for its great technical skill or is even regarded as a great play. Rather its importance lies within its construction by Grimké, Du Bois, and the NAACP as a propaganda play. The play was meant to reject prominent white supremacist narratives that were reinforced/supported by D.W. Griffith’s “The Birth of a Nation” film at the time. The technique of the NAACP and Grimké was to counter white supremacist propaganda featured in the film with their own propaganda through the form of a play, which sought to present different narratives about black people to a specifically white audience. “Rachel” directly counters the narrative that the black female body is hypersexual and promiscuous, for instance, by presenting Rachel Loving as a fundamentally pure character. She expresses no sense of sexual maturity or any sort of sexual desire in general, reducing her to an infantilized individual that the intended white Christian female audience could resonate with and perhaps pity. Since the intended audience was white Christian women, Grimké and the NAACP took special care to ensure that Rachel, Tom and John Strong were presented as pure, non-threatening individuals, since the audience would’ve been looking for characters that feed into current narratives about black sexuality, black men, etc. Tom and John Strong are meant to counter the dangerous narrative that black men are overly sexual, aggressive, dangerous, etc. by showing their characters as fundamentally hardworking men who want to provide for the women in their lives (for Tom, for his mother and sister; for John, for Rachel, who he loves). Tom is frustrated at the oppression they face as black people, but his frustration is limited to his words; Grimké seems to purposefully avoid any character really showing any sort of anger towards anti-black racism to ensure the audience saw them as fundamentally non-threatening. Even the setting and scene design is intention. Grimké includes Angel-like and heaven-esq paintings that are part of the Western artistic canon; presenting images of white figures that are divine, familiar, and comforting to the white female audience. But one painting shows black women working in a field and is meant to signal to the audience that this family values hard work and engages in it in their lives. It’s worth noting “Rachel” is the first play written by a black woman that was performed by an all-black cast for an all-white, mainstream audience. It is also the first play to explicitly protest against racial violence and lynchings, which were at an all time high when “Rachel” was written. However, Grimké was widely criticized at the time by fellow black writers and intellectuals. They debated on the nature of black art or black drama/theatre, what made something “black art,” who it should be for, and how it should be used. One of the major points of contention around “Rachel” was that because it catered to a white audience, it operated within the confines of the white perception of black people, rather than a play that truly spoke to and represented the real lived experiences of black people and black culture. This is clear if you consider Rachel Loving, who instead of being depicted as a grown woman with her own desires and needs, she is infantilized to avoid the entire association between a black female body and a hypersexual persona. It’s important to keep in mind what the NAACP and Grimké wanted to do with the play (counter white supremacist propaganda with their own form of propaganda) but it’s also worth considering what her black contemporaries thought of her play and what role black art should serve in society.