Really interesting, if a little dry. As a sucker for Victorian true crime and social histories, this one caught my eye from the moment I saw it at the library. I was also intrigued in that it was a "local" crime (well, Irish, anyway).
Ireland's Eye is a small island off the coast of Howth Head near Dublin. In 1852, during the Victorian period, a couple visit the island for its various swimming and artistic properties. They spend the day apart, and arrange a pickup in the evening by local boatmen. But when the boat operators arrive, only one is still alive...
William and Maria Kirwan are part of Dublin's elite and well-respected class. They are tourists, renting rooms in Howth for a few weeks in the summer. He's an artist by trade and likes spending time on the remote island to paint, and she is an accomplished swimmer who enjoys bathing and the outdoors. But then Maria is found dead, William is the only other person on the island and questions are left unanswered. Your quintessential locked room mystery.
Did she drown? Was she held underwater by the husband? Or was it an epileptic fit? Or maybe she was suffocated. Accident or murder? This is the question the whole trial – and book – hinges on.
It's no spoiler to say William was found guilty. But why? What did the jury see to make them rule so? With so much conflicting evidence, much of it hearsay, contradictory, or second-hand, what evidence did they value? What evidence did they discount? The autopsy was performed a month after burial (when suspicions were raised). What medicinal evidence did they put store in – the student who originally evaluated her, or the doctors who performed the very late autopsy?
What about the modern day scientist or observer? Could screams from the island have been heard by numerous witnesses on shore? Were the cuts made by crabs, rocks, or scratched in a struggle? Should we consider William's less than salubrious treatment of Maria or his extra-marital actions? Today, we call that motive. And it's pretty dang important. But back then, the judge told them to disregard it. Were they – and are we – coloured by our preconceptions of this rather despicable and likely abusive man? Did Maria have any evidence of epilepsy? Was there evidence of domestic abuse? Did she know about William's sex scandals? Did Maria have mental health problems? Is there evidence he held her underwater? Or were all of these details played up or even invented?
Many questions remain, and sadly the book can't answer them all, or even most of them. But it's a pretty interesting read if you want to learn more about the Victorian legal system, attitudes towards crime, social culture in Ireland in the 1850s, and the Irish Victorian way of thinking. Just be aware that the writing is a bit dry, and at times, a little obtuse. It wasn't enough to put me off because I'm an unflinching Victorian era obsessee, but I can see how a reader with only a cursory interest in the time period/genre might not enjoy it as much as I did.