Rating: 4.5/5 stars
___
“I wanted to write about surviving. About striving to survive, about fighting not to fall off the edge of the cliff, and about holding on. [...] Through this novel, I wanted to portray the other side of the Korean Wave, to show how class issues between races and linguistic challenges transcend national borders.” - Seo Su-jin
___
In Korean Teachers, we meet Seo-jin, whose aspiration and desire to become a Korean teacher for the sake of financial stability propels her not to confront the authority about her mistreatment for fear of losing the job; Mi-ju, a defiant and uncompromising teacher, whose unpleasant experiences dealing with society give rise to her indifference towards others, and adamancy to adhere to her teaching principles. Yet, she struggles to choose between her effective, result-oriented pedagogy and bowing down to the capitalist school director; Ga-eun, the popular teacher among students, whose favourable student evaluations and awards received drive her to contemplate the reason behind her popularity: Perhaps it is because she is lenient and compromising teacher who fulfills students’ demands that they favour her; Han-hee, a lecturer-in-charge who is on maternity leave and constantly feels on edge due to her uncertain career fate.
The author explores the intersectionality between female corporeality, gender discrimination in the workplace, and capitalism; and presents a hauntingly convincing critique of education institutions as money-making machines. The ever-growing K-wave has undeniably contributed to both cultural propagation and economic development in South Korea. It is a worldwide phenomenon that is illustrated and discussed in numerous Korean literary works. Nevertheless, unlike them, Korean Teachers serves as a razor-sharp scalpel, shedding light on how the powerful make use of the rise of the aforesaid phenomenon and exploit others for money and material gain. All this happens in the sacred institution of academia.
Thousands of international students enrol in Korean language courses. They are the customers whose demands the teachers are obligated to fulfill for fear of receiving unfavourable student evaluations and getting dismissed. Thus, unintentional hostility and jealousy between these teachers while fighting for a staff quota place. They are well aware that they are as replaceable as any consumable, disposable good in the capitalistic environment. Unavoidably, such an unhealthy competition brings about the manifestations of a deep sense of helplessness and banal anxiety in both physical and mental health.
Perhaps what makes Korean Teachers an eye-opening read is the author’s incorporation of Korean grammar as a mirror of reality and an impressionistic meditation on certainty and uncertainty; hope and despair; and above all, complacency and complicity. The linguistic barriers observed between the teachers and the students serve as a literary tool contributing to the unforeseen conflicts and suggest the futility of language in cross-cultural communication. I couldn’t recommend this genuinely brilliant book more, which is indeed becoming part of the canonical and deserves a wide readership.