What do you think?
Rate this book
Axiomatics: Mathematical Thought and High Modernism
The first history of postwar mathematics, offering a new interpretation of the rise of abstraction and axiomatics in the twentieth century.
Why did abstraction dominate American art, social science, and natural science in the mid-twentieth century? Why, despite opposition, did abstraction and theoretical knowledge flourish across a diverse set of intellectual pursuits during the Cold War? In recovering the centrality of abstraction across a range of modernist projects in the United States, Alma Steingart brings mathematics back into the conversation about midcentury American intellectual thought. The expansion of mathematics in the aftermath of World War II, she demonstrates, was characterized by two opposing research in pure mathematics became increasingly abstract and rarified, while research in applied mathematics and mathematical applications grew in prominence as new fields like operations research and game theory brought mathematical knowledge to bear on more domains of knowledge. Both were predicated on the same abstractionist conception of mathematics and were rooted in the same modern axiomatics.
For American mathematicians, the humanities and the sciences did not compete with one another, but instead were two complementary sides of the same epistemological commitment. Steingart further reveals how this mathematical epistemology influenced the sciences and humanities, particularly the postwar social sciences. As mathematics changed, so did the meaning of mathematization.
Axiomatics focuses on American mathematicians during a transformative time, following a series of controversies among mathematicians about the nature of mathematics as a field of study and as a body of knowledge. The ensuing debates offer a window onto the postwar development of mathematics band Cold War epistemology writ large. As Steingart’s history ably demonstrates, mathematics is the social activity in which styles of truth—here, abstraction—become synonymous with ways of knowing.
Why did abstraction dominate American art, social science, and natural science in the mid-twentieth century? Why, despite opposition, did abstraction and theoretical knowledge flourish across a diverse set of intellectual pursuits during the Cold War? In recovering the centrality of abstraction across a range of modernist projects in the United States, Alma Steingart brings mathematics back into the conversation about midcentury American intellectual thought. The expansion of mathematics in the aftermath of World War II, she demonstrates, was characterized by two opposing research in pure mathematics became increasingly abstract and rarified, while research in applied mathematics and mathematical applications grew in prominence as new fields like operations research and game theory brought mathematical knowledge to bear on more domains of knowledge. Both were predicated on the same abstractionist conception of mathematics and were rooted in the same modern axiomatics.
For American mathematicians, the humanities and the sciences did not compete with one another, but instead were two complementary sides of the same epistemological commitment. Steingart further reveals how this mathematical epistemology influenced the sciences and humanities, particularly the postwar social sciences. As mathematics changed, so did the meaning of mathematization.
Axiomatics focuses on American mathematicians during a transformative time, following a series of controversies among mathematicians about the nature of mathematics as a field of study and as a body of knowledge. The ensuing debates offer a window onto the postwar development of mathematics band Cold War epistemology writ large. As Steingart’s history ably demonstrates, mathematics is the social activity in which styles of truth—here, abstraction—become synonymous with ways of knowing.
299 pages, Paperback
Published January 17, 2023
6 people are currently reading
91 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
June 2, 2023
Docked off a star because it wasn’t long enough.
November 6, 2023
4.5 stars rounded up to 5 for how enlightening it is across a range of disciplines.
November 11, 2024
Excellent book, very informative, academic and detailed but not tedious.
I'm a mathematician myself, interested in the history of mathematics, and it was illuminating to read about the discipline in the context of modernization. The book goes well beyond the abstract ideas of the axiomatic methods started by Hilbert, and spends the majority of the discussion for the clash between 'applied' and 'pure' mathematics, as understood (?) by both its practitioners and outsiders, including the Government, through funding programs.
A very enjoyable read, full of excellent references and many stories I wasn't aware of.
I would even argue that it's a great read for non-mathematicians as well, since it's not at all technical, mathematically speaking. It presents mathematics as a method of thinking about the world, a meaning which we all must be aware of.
I'm a mathematician myself, interested in the history of mathematics, and it was illuminating to read about the discipline in the context of modernization. The book goes well beyond the abstract ideas of the axiomatic methods started by Hilbert, and spends the majority of the discussion for the clash between 'applied' and 'pure' mathematics, as understood (?) by both its practitioners and outsiders, including the Government, through funding programs.
A very enjoyable read, full of excellent references and many stories I wasn't aware of.
I would even argue that it's a great read for non-mathematicians as well, since it's not at all technical, mathematically speaking. It presents mathematics as a method of thinking about the world, a meaning which we all must be aware of.
June 21, 2023
This type of book is badly needed in times when academic tribalism seems to be so pervasive.
Besides the book's main axis (that of the relationship between mathematics and art, social sciences etc), I think the author expounds very clearly how hard (impossible?) it is to do history of mathematics if you cannot get rid of a Platonic worldview. I would really like to see a conversation between the author and somebody like Sabine Hossenfelder.
Besides the book's main axis (that of the relationship between mathematics and art, social sciences etc), I think the author expounds very clearly how hard (impossible?) it is to do history of mathematics if you cannot get rid of a Platonic worldview. I would really like to see a conversation between the author and somebody like Sabine Hossenfelder.
January 2, 2024
A unique book. Written in an academic style, but charting the history of mid-century mathemathics in a new way. The connections to art, philosophy of science, and sociology of science are well mapped out. The distinction between the rise and fall of high abstraction as a mathematical approach and as a program to drive a wedge between pure and applied mathemathics is extremely insightful. One of the books that makes you think about history of science and mathematics in a new light.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews