(TLDR: The writing of this book is beyond messy on its own, but this book's arc holds similarities to the transatlantic slave trade but with an entirely white cast, and unfortunately has poor narrative framing that—though most likely unintentionally—corresponds with colonialist propaganda and eugenics rhetoric. Though I would HIGHLY recommend reading this whole review to learn what these points look like within context!)
Honestly, I should’ve known something was up when the white MC mentioned he makes dreamcatchers on page 8.
So the writing of this book was bad from the get go. There were sentences that contained repeated clauses, sentences in which the subject of the sentence (in terms of structure, not topic) literally switched mid-sentence, and entire paragraphs that were near nonsensical. The pacing of the writing (not even the story necessarily) was so rushed and hasty and written in such an overly-simplified manner that I felt like I would blink and miss an entire plot point. It felt like I was skimming even when I wasn't.
There will be spoilers ahead, but you shouldn't read this book so don't worry about it.
Then I really started getting some bad vibes as the book began to unveil a larger plot. Essentially, the big plot twist of the book is that when people get infected by a zombie bite, they sometimes turn into zombies, and other times, they remain human, but just look like zombies. When defining groups of people that fit into ideals of humanity or are pushed outside of it, there's an inherent metaphor for marginalized individuals. At this point, I couldn't put my finger on what marginalization this metaphor reflected quite yet. (Spoiler alert: it's Black and disabled people, as it often is with zombie media.) With this reveal came a lot of really weird messaging. The main character is obviously horrified to learn that he and his community have been killing people they assumed to be zombies, which sparks a discussion around the idea of oppression stemming from fear and misinformation. And that rhetoric is... say it with me: colonialist propaganda! Because oppression is intentional and calculated hatred, NOT accidental. Any time you see a character (especially a character the audience is meant to relate to) learning that someone they've been hurting has only been hurt due to misunderstanding or fear, this should be a huge red flag.
Then, in this same conversation, a character who is one of these "not-quite-zombies" says some interesting things that raised some more red flags. Namely: ."..somehow some of those bitten by the Dead are returned to this world bearin' a resemblance to them, but not their darkness... what good is a soul when it's trapped inside a shell the world knows only as a monster?" and "...the world is at war with the Pale Ones and we're pale too. And no war is fought more fiercely that one fought without any doubts about who the enemy is. What if people did learn that some of us don't turn into monsters? Could a boy your age really go out there and take up the fight so freely if you weren't confident of who your enemy was?" So if we're going by the established metaphor that zombies are some sort of marginalized group, we're now establishing that some are "better" and "worthy of life" and others are still "monsters" and "unworthy of life"? Now at this point in the story, we aren't really given a concrete idea of why they believe some zombies should live and some should die, but we're already creating a pretty base level of eugenics in these few lines. With mass oppression throughout history, we constantly hear this kind of language, categorizing entire communities into "the good ones" and "the bad ones." And usually "the good ones" in a marginalized group are those who are assimilating or performing within the standards of white supremacy. (This is very similar to the type of sorting that occurred during the Holocaust with autistic people, and how the concept of "Aspergers" came about, but this sort of rhetoric has occurred throughout history in the oppression of Black people, Latinx people, disabled people, Jewish people, and more.)
And then this is where we learn that the whole thing is a metaphor for the transatlantic slave trade. Essentially, one of the characters has turned into a "not-quite-zombie" and the MC is going with the other "not-quite-zombie" to go find and save him. We learn that when people are bitten by zombies, they are led to a secluded part of the forest behind a waterfall and are tied up to posts. If those people turn into "regular zombies" they are killed. If those people turn into "not-quite-zombies," they are sold as slaves in return for medicine and other supplies. I'll just type this part out for you. This is someone, titled "the traveller," looking to enslave the character who was recently turned into a "not-quite-zombie". "Now, you're young and you look like the real athletic type. I have no doubt you'll be able to walk right on in to one of them towns crawlin' with deadbeats and bring medicines and liquor safely outta there for me. If you play your cards real nice, I'll clothe you and bathe you. I mean, I can see you've soiled yourself already. I'll give you a nice home in the outhouse round the back of my cabin, and you and me won't have a cross word. But then again, we might." He then reveals he has a girl with him who he's also enslaved and continues: "Now, show this nice young man how difficult it can be for your kind if you don't play nicely,"... The woman did as she was told and slipped the dress from her shoulders to reveal the blistering whip marks across her back. At this point, it was undeniable that this book was essentially just a metaphor for the transatlantic slave trade, played out with white people and zombies. And this of course makes all of the narrative framing of the earlier statements really horrifying.
This scene also illuminates the previous ableism, by giving us the tools to figure out what differentiates the "regular zombies" from the "not-quite zombies." Their usefulness. The "regular zombies" are killed because they're "mindless" and therefore dangerous, when the "not-quite-zombies" can be considered human enough to be used as free labor. If the eugenics plot line was shaky before, this certainly solidified the book's stance.
I did finish the book, but after this reveal, nothing else really mattered. I honestly only finished it to see if I could find more terribly written sentences to laugh at (because I was so furious about the metaphor reveal), but it was just a lot of fighting, violence, and argument over the concept of "humanity." And it maybe could've had bits of interesting commentary, but once they placed certain "zombies" over others, it was all frivolous ableist nonsense.
I'd also like to briefly mention that since zombification occurs through infection, the narrative framing also implies that Black people and disabled people are naturally diseased. I hope I don't need to explain why that's a fucked up thing.
This was one of my first direct ventures into zombie media (I'm quite squeamish at films and TV) and wasn't aware beforehand of the origins of Western zombies. Zombies are actually a concept taken from Haiti, specifically from religious practices and beliefs, and turned into an inaccurate and commodified horror movie monster. And a lot of zombie media contains pretty severe anti-Black, anti-Indigenous, and ableist sentiments. Which makes this book's concept and execution (if you can even call this mess an execution) even more awful.
On the bright side, this book had a sweet achillean romance and the MC's dad was genuinely one of the best and most supportive parents I've seen in media, especially queer media.
CW: dead bodies, blood/gore, violence, gun violence, eyeball gore, drowning, decapitation, animal death, death, character death, grief, slavery, ableist and racist rhetoric, colonialist rhetoric, death of father (onscreen, SC), death of mother (past), underage drinking (brief), suicide (implied), sexual content (offscreen), cultural appropriation (dreamcatchers)