Hmm. I'll start off by saying I've only gotten to page 63 and am debating whether it's worth my time to continue on. Most likely, I won't. Roth writes in a fluid, conversational tone that makes the reading smooth and easy to absorb. The problem however is that there is hardly any real substance to what he says. It's cotton candy. If you take to reading self-development books, a lot of his concepts--you'll realize--are hardly new. No problem there. Sometime, it take a new perspective on the concept for it to click into your stubborn head. I know that's often my case. However, that said, I felt Roth is attitude toward achievement was "just do it, already!" "Stop stopping yourself, just do it already!" Which is true and solid advice. However, the reason most people can't just "do it" because they've developed and internalized a lot of self-limitation which they cannot free themselves of. It is this handicap that I don't believe Roth truly engaged or tried to dismantle. Telling someone they're limiting themselves with self-imposed bullshit isn't the same as helping them try to remove it. You know?
Secondly, the concept of No Meaning as he portrays it didn't sit well with me. Basically Roth tells you to dismantle all associations you've projected on the world/people/things around you. To, essentially free yourself from the meaning so you can accomplish shit. He claims that once you've gone through the exercise of saying "such and such has no meaning" and really let it sink in, you break the chains and free yourself. THEN you are able to CHOOSE a new meaning that is more conducive in achieving your goals. Sounds good, right? It is. Super powerful tool. But limited, I believe.
IT IS self-empowering to stop ascribing and associating meaning to everything around you. YOU don't know that anything IS what you believe it to be. How could you being a human of limited perception? Good, that's solid. But that doesn't mean things do not have meaning. As a person of Faith, I choose to believe that ALL THINGS to a simple grain of sand have profound meaning known only by God, by His purpose. Just because I don't get it or see it, doesn't mean it's not there. Roth's approach completely dismisses the metaphysical reality of life, which in turn, is as limiting as you can get.
And I don't think this is a situation where I can separate my Faith from my approach in living life. The two come together. Our purpose and goals are set by values and beliefs. If you don't believe there is meaning in anything, then what's the essence of your push to achieve? It could be many things, but for me, it relates to my Faith. Furthermore, if nothing has meaning, then were is morality in accountability in our actions? You could go to argue that morals and values have no meaning, they're self created, imposed. But again, that overrides the natural law of things. We know for example, deep down in our bones, that taking a life has a powerful meaning.
I would amend Roth's No Meaning approach by saying: Things do have meaning. Profound meaning. Meaning you most likely cannot grasp. So, stop projecting your own limited meaning. Try to be open to the Universe around you, let it unveil itself to you. Roth's approach, in my opinion, is very postmodern and blindsided. That said, this book aside from all the empty just-do-it cheerleading, probably does have some tools and exercise that will help people break through their self-limitation. But unlike Roth, who literally says all paths end in death eventually, so what's the big deal, go ahead and achieve what you have to achieve--I would say, the path you choose is very important. The destination in the end is death, but how you get there makes all the difference. So, if you want to learn how to achieve things in life, it DOES matter how you go about it, how you program your mind in seeing life.