I actually finished this book a while ago, but I’ve been slacking on updating Goodreads. I enjoyed Shagduk, and it’s always nice reading books from debut or mostly-new authors! I gave it four stars out of five because I have decently high criteria for a book to be five stars, but this book did a lot of interesting things.
Pro: Incredibly unique style. I’ve never quite read a book like Shagduk before in terms of style. Sure, I’ve read “journal-style” books before, but this book committed to it in a way very few books do.
Con: Very slow-paced. It takes a *long* time to get moving and for things to happen. If the whole book took pace at the “event speed” of maybe the last 100 pages I’d give it a 5-star probably, as this was my biggest gripe. The pages didn’t go down easily or quickly while I was reading them, but I appreciated the book more after I finished it.
Pro: Felt true-to-life. With the exception of perhaps something listed as a nitpick below, the amount of care put into our main character’s life made it very realistic, as did the attention to detail. This felt like a journal, with all the pros and cons that come with that. This pairs with the earlier-mentioned commitment to the bit.
Con: Hard to feel invested/lack of peril. Until near the end (where I felt the risk posed to the characters well), I never really felt like the characters were in danger (see: nitpick at end). This pairs with that it generally took me longer to become invested in the characters than usual, perhaps due to the journal formatting, the amount of characters, or something else.
Pro: Fun wit and character interactions! This book is clever in spades, and I enjoyed reading the dialogue between characters, especially the band group and some of the love interest-esque characters. And the main character has plenty of sharp thoughts for the reader to take in.
Con: Hard to follow. This is mostly due to the large amounts of random detail, whether that was the main character’s very erudite academic remakes that were sometimes to parse or some of the period-specific stuff. There were also a lot of characters to remember, but part of that is the necessary consequence of being true to life.
Nitpick/neutral: The main character doesn’t seem to care nearly as much as he should about the demonic creature after him? That is kind of hilarious to me, and I appreciated it more after I finished the book. But it was a bold choice, and it contributed to the lack of peril I felt, as well as the slow pace. The main character is a lot of things, but he isn’t as active of an investigator as, say, the Bastard.
All in all, I enjoyed Shagduk, but I enjoyed it most once I had finished it and could look back on the book as a whole. It also gains a boost for me from being from a small author. Consider giving it a shot!