I feel pretty bad giving three stars to a first book but let me explain myself. This is my opinion and I’m sorry if my review sound mean, I promise that it’s not my intention. I’m just trying to be constructive and honest and explain the three stars. Sorry if I’m wrong at some places, I have a pretty weird memory and reading is sometimes hard for me so it happens for me to skip a few sentences and miss something. (Also I’m just 18 so maybe it’s why some of the stuff in the book didn’t really make sense to me)
First of all, the identity theft concept looked pretty promising and interesting at the beginning. It seemed like a pretty original concept. But the book wasn’t as good as I expected it to be.
I don’t think it could be seen as a thriller, it’s more like a mystery.
The story was pretty slow and sometimes I couldn’t really tell where it was going. There was some storylines that didn’t seem very necessary.
I’m not at all saying that I disliked the book or anything like that, but it was pretty hard for me to really get into it while reading it and be interested in the story. For me, a book that I’m into is a book that I enjoy reading, the reading of it is fluid. For Stealing John Hancock, I didn’t really enjoy it and my reading of it wasn’t fluid (except for a few chapters where I saw that I was kinda into it). I felt like I had to force myself to read it a little bit. Again, it doesn’t mean that I disliked it, but I just wasn’t able to enjoy it, which is one of the reasons why I gave it 3 stars.
The beginning of the book seemed promising and I really wanted to get into it but I just wasn’t able to. The story seemed to drag itself (I don’t know if it’s understandable and if ‘drag itself’ works in English? Sorry English isn’t my first language) and seemed slow so it was hard to get into it.
But the whole time I was reading I was wondering what was gonna be the twist to the story or what the end was gonna be so I guess that’s a good thing.
The end though was satisfying (even though it felt kind of forced and weird and there wasn’t any twists unless I’m mistaken) and seemed to hint to a sequel, which would be interesting.
Also, I liked that JP and Erika’s “relationship” was only hinted and not showed at the end of the book. Like, this way their “relationship” (sorry I can’t really remember the word I’m looking for but I know relationship doesn’t fit) doesn’t come out of nowhere or is being rushed into the story and it just came out as a surprise and it hints at a sequel and says it’s gonna be deepened in the sequel. I like that it hints at it being deepened in a sequel (if I’m not mistaken about this) rather than it being rushed and pushed into the story.
Hopefully, if there is a sequel, some stuff will be more explained and it will be more constructed as the first one. Unfortunately, I don’t think I will be reading the sequel if there is one. The first one already wasn’t really for me but I’m sure a lot of people will be interested in a sequel.
There’s also seem to be some plot holes. Sorry if I’m wrong at some places.
1- Grey is obsessed with catching Hancock but she and everyone else don’t seem to make that much efforts into catching him. It’s funny how Hancock is always able to run away from them whenever he’s caught by the police. She knew he walked past him when she went to see Danny’s body, but she can’t tell it’s him at the funeral, even though he could have been seen as suspicious (and she obviously knew he could be attending the funeral) and she probably knew a little bit what he looked like.
Also, they didn’t think of tracking his phone earlier before Erika broke his phone?
2- They taped Gran’s phone. In one chapter, Grey says they are surveilling Gran’s residence. But then in the next chapter, Beth calls JP with Gran’s phone (and for some reason she had the new phone number he gave her added in her phone even though it could be unsafe) and then JP comes to Gran’s appartment without the police knowing. JP doesn’t change his SIM card afterwards, when the police could have retraced him or whatever is the reason why he had to change his SIM card before.
I don’t know anything about this kind of stuff, but if they taped Gran’s phone, wouldn’t they be aware of the phone calls she gives and not just the ones she receives? Also, JP told her that if she called she would have to call with another phone, so I guess he knew about that.
3- JP said that at his audition, he had a lot of competition. Why was he the one chosen for the identity theft if there was a bunch of other people? And what about the other audition staff? When JP talked about it, it seemed like there was more than just Max and Danny at the audition. How is it possible to hire that much people for a fake audition?
4- Coincidently, Max looks exactly like JP, which seems like a really weird coincidence and doesn’t really make sense (to me). It’s not really explained and JP just accepts it. He didn’t even ask himself questions or saw that he really looked like him when he first saw Max at the audition (if I’m not wrong, JP met Max at the fake audition?) It just seems to be there to make the ending somehow work.
There is a lot of coincidences in the book that don’t really seem to make sense.
I’m not gonna talk about every ‘plot holes’ there seemed to be (to me) because I think this is already enough and I don’t want this review to be too much.
Again, this is just my opinion but I feel like some stuff in the book didn’t make sense and wouldn’t be stuff that would happen in real life (like some of the police stuff) (but you’re the ones that did research about it so sorry if it sounds rude to say that). But again, this is fiction so I guess it’s supposed to be fine?
I’m sorry if some of the stuff I’m “complaining” about don’t matter or something like that but when I’m reading a book and something doesn’t seem right or factual, it just tickles me the whole time.
Again, this is just my opinion and there’s probably other people that say differently from what I’m saying.
I thought the small family references were cute like the Darth Vader bobble head and Kaylen Dillon as one of Erika’s fake identities.
I feel really bad giving three stars to your first book but it’s just me trying to be honest and I hope my review didn’t sound mean because it wasn’t my intention! Also, I was pretty mixed up and I didn’t know if I was gonna give four or three stars (again I’m sorry about the three stars).
I might be interested in reading one of your future books (if it’s not a part of a John Hancock series) and I wish you good luck with your future writing!
I don’t even know if y’all are gonna read the review so it’s pretty embarrassing if I send that super long review and you don’t end up reading it haha