“This kaleidoscopic collection will help you see and comprehend the world anew—which is, in my book, what good art should do.” —Astra Taylor
It is a scary and disorienting time for art, as it is a scary and disorienting time in general. Aesthetic experience is both overshadowed by the spectacle of current events and pressed into new connection with them. The self-image of art as a social good is collapsing under the weight of capitalism’s dysfunction.
In these incisive essays, art critic Ben Davis makes sense of our extreme present as an emerging "after-culture"—a culture whose forms and functions are being radically reshaped by cataclysmic events. In the face of catastrophe, he holds out hope that reckoning with the new realities of art, technology, activism, and the media, can help us weather the super-storms of the future.
Ben Davis is an art critic living in New York City. His writings have appeared in Adbusters, the Brooklyn Rail, Slate, the Village Voice, and many other publications. He is currently executive editor of Artinfo.com.
it took me so long to finish this book that it became a joke among my friends that i would never finish it despite having it with me every day. BUT! it was just so thought-provoking that i NEEDED to take my time.
the book dissected contemporary issues and how their impact reverberates into the art world. each chapter covers completely different aspects of the topic, so it's hard to even summarize it here now...
highly recommend to anyone interested in current art trends and challenges and potential for its role in the future!
He writes from an exclusive interest in the intersection of art and socialist activism, focused on how art supports power or can help fight for equality and against climate change. At its best, this book describes and analyzes historical evolution of trends in art, often with a critical eye. Some essays seemed tangentially related to art, but fascinating nonetheless. While I have some resistance to explictly Marxist assertions I was able to get past those and find a lot of value in the book. The first several chapters provoked a lot of thoughts and reactions that I wanted to write down.
Chapters 1 and 3 clearly and persuasively detail ways that power shapes our understanding of art. He points out how our modern conception the "artist" as a lone genius outsider arose in the 19th-century Romantic era, as a response to the dehumanizing effects of industrialization and as a way for capitalism to commodify artistic practice. Prior to this era, there was no separate between "fine art" and "craft", and our modern notion of artist as genius is one that, say, Rafael would not recognize. Now I want to read the book he cites for this idea, "The Invention of Art". He later traces 20th-century transformations in the notion of art and of "contemporary art," then again how social media is radically transforming the art experience today. I'm also usually skeptical about generic ideas about "culture" now being worse than "culture" in some previous era: is the way the masses create and appreciate images on Instagram really so much worse from the masses' interaction with art, say, a century ago? Nonetheless, his analysis of this culture is fascinating.
In Chapter 4 he extrapolates to AI art, viewing it as a corporate tool, a natural extension of our current social media moment that flattens all of art history and removes context, intention, and meaning. He cites technologists making scary quasi-utopian claims about how their AI will replace artists. This is in keeping with his focus on the contemporary art world and how it interacts with power, but I'm still sad to see mainstream contemporary art completely dismissing the possibility of AI tools for artists, especially given the way he touches on the transformations due to past technological tools like photography and the Internet. Indeed, one theme of the book is the way revolutionary-minded artists created innovations in art that became tools of a new consumerist drive, e.g., the way revolutionaries of 1960s art inadvertently created our current populist Instagram art world, which he parallels with the utopian hippies that created the free and open and now-scary Internet. I'd had no idea that the founder of BuzzFeed and HuffPost began as a Marxist artist.
While he doesn't discuss NFTs, this history provides useful context for the farcical revolutionary claims that NFTs will lead to some kind of power shift to the underdog artist, rather than just tools for the ambitions of those competing to become oligarchs of a new economy.
The other chapters, while fascinating, well-written, and extremely informative, I don't have a lot of specific reactions that I wanted to write down. I did find the final chapter, about the possible role that artists can perform in envisioning change, especially in the face of our current environmental catastrophe, to be unexpectedly believable and worthwhile.
The relationship between art and capitalism is something I’ve always been fascinated with, and this series of essays covers so much conceptual ground that I’m left craving a reread already. I found it very accessible as a novice in both leftist politics and art history/criticism. The kinds of thinking this book encouraged leave me hungering for more. It’s not often nonfiction leaves me scouring the web for more work from the author, but here I am, ready to crack open 9.5 Theses on Art and Class
Despite its title, much of the book is only peripherally concerned with "art". After an odd introduction of speculative future-fiction, which was rather off-putting and had initially made me put it aside, Davis offers two focussed chapters on art and politics today that grapple quite well and concretely with many of the contradictory issues in contemporary art. The genealogy of the "autonomy" of art was useful for an introduction and these chapters on the 20thC interplay between pop-culture and fine art were quite insightful.
The turn to AI, social networks, and conspiracy theories, however, was less interesting, or at least less about art at all.
Definitely a harder academic read but interesting nonetheless the less. I began reading this for my thesis but wanted to continue after the chapter on AI was so good. As soon as the author begins talking a lot of politics, he brings it right back to how it relates to art.
Davis addresses how art has become a means of communication for underrepresented communities and how politics is both helping and hindering the arts in different ways. He wrote about capitalism, museum work, classism, racism, and sexism within both the US political climate and the arts.
It was fascinating to learn the ways art is transforming with technology. It continues to contribute to society, in many ways without people knowing.
One of the last quotes I loved was “there are no more radical solutions left- we are forced to imagine the future in terms of radical change…”.
A book that combined conversations of Pepe the frog, QAnon, and Black Panther, this book still had me completely rethink the ways I consider art in my everyday life. Somehow relatable, Ben Davis brought everything back to a really well-argued thesis of art’s purpose in our political climate— with cultural appropriation, AI, and conspiracy as some of his strongest arguments.
Also, his particular conversation in Ecotopia got me thinking as someone who works in art development. With works surrounding climate radicalism, is the performative nature of upper class society investing in these artworks truly taking away from actual action?
An excellent book examining and reviewing some of the major issues concerning art as well as society as a whole. The author touches, among other things, on AI technology, cultural appropriation, conspiracy theory and the different ways art is handling the climate crisis. For each chapter, he gathers thoughts from some of our time's biggest thinkers, writers and artists to shine light on a subject from different angles. It's a thought-provoking and deeply relevant read.
Plenty of insights (particularly essays such as ‘AI Aestethics and Capitalism’, or ‘Cultural Appropriation) but also plenty of tangential material that gave the book a somewhat bloated, unfocused feel at times. Given the choice, I would have gladly left out entire chapters such as ‘The Anarchist in the Network’ or ‘The Mirror of Conspiracy’ while expanding ‘Art and Ecotopia’ - the latter’s too brief and schematic treatment making it seem more like an afterthought than a topic on equal footing with the others. Not a big fan of the speculative & gimmicky Prologue / Epilogue either.
Super, super interesting and thought-provoking, especially the anarchist in the machine chapter and the cultural appropriation chapter. Made me think about where art is going and the trajectory it’s on in a way I haven’t really articulated or fully thought through in years (or ever). I just wish everything got pulled together a bit more in the end, instead of the fanciful speculative future afterword. Next on art criticism: what is art? by tolstoy
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Insanely good analysis combining Marxism, art, technology, and politics. Ben addresses some important questions I’ve been asking myself and his thinking leaves little within its scope overlooked.
i absolutely swear by this book. anyone even remotely interested in contemporary arts culture, especially in relation to capitalism and Marxism, needs to pick this up!
read this. went to a crazy museum in the middle of reading it and had many many thoughts definitely influenced by it. almost cried on my couch when reading the last sentences in the chapter about AI and the future of art. idk idk kinda wish office hours were still a thing
Perhaps the most densely constructed critique of artistic endeavor in the present moment possible? An incredible contribution that I have taken a lot from.