I have been avoiding writing this review, simply because of how much I've been struggling to put into words my feelings regarding this book. I've been trying to make it coherent since I finished the book, but that was a harder task than I originally assumed it would be.
None of This is Serious is an interesting book, in terms of it being exactly what it said it will but also completely different than what I expected. I expected to find this very relatable and to enjoy it a lot more than ended up being the case. This book was compared to Sally Rooney by a lot of reviews, and I fairly recently read Conversations With Friends, so I was pretty excited for None of This is Serious.
The book opens with our main character Sophie, at a party with friends. It is definitely a slice-of-life story, just the cast of characters going about their everyday life. However, at this party the characters witness "a crack in the sky" appear, which is perhaps a trick of the light, pollution, or some sign of the rapture - the thing is, no one actually knows. Seeing that, everyone takes to social media, where countless comments, doubts, and memes appear and everyone just moves on. Everyone goes back to their regularly scheduled lives, Sophie is without success looking for a job, and having relationship issues, both romantic and overall. What is interesting about this book is that it combines the existential dread of being in your 20s, growing up, and having no clue what you're supposed to do, with a more urgent, but similarly futile existential dread caused by inevitable climate change and what is perceived as a sign of impending doom.
First, I will say that everything that happens we witness through the protagonist, Sophie's point of view. This is where a clear comparison with Sally Rooney is being made – while Rooney just doesn't use quotation marks, here they are used, but not when Sophie speaks. I found this slightly disorienting and confusing as most of the time I assumed that something was Sophie's inner monologue, and then a character would directly respond to that. To no quotation marks whatsoever I adapted very quickly, but the way it was done here was something I did not get used to by the end – but that might just be my issue that no one else will experience.
Sophie is an interesting main character to follow. She is someone I thought I would relate to – she is in her early 20s, she spends a lot of her time online, struggles with her body image, with her family, theirs and overall societal expectations etc. A lot of those topics are very relevant to me, and yet reading this I wanted nothing but for this book to end sooner. Now, I don't generally think characters need to be "likeable" for me to enjoy them, but there was just something about Sophie that truly stopped me from understanding her as a character and to enjoy reading from her perspective. I think it was maybe because nothing she thinks feels like it's her own. And I don't mean that in a way that she is just like everyone else – I wouldn't mind that in the slightest. This is more the fact that reading this you just witness her react to things. We are supposedly in her head, reading from her perspective, but it feels like if there was nothing to react to, she would just not think or say anything. Maybe that is the point, the book deals a lot with how the social media influences us all, and maybe this is some commentary on that, but if it is it probably went over my head, as this just did not make for an enjoyable reading experience. Reading from her perspective often felt more frustrating than anything else. She does often feel younger than she is, even straight-up childish at times. In some aspects this book feels more like it should be ya rather than new adult/adult contemporary. She most of the time seems like a passive observer in her own life, and not like someone willing and capable to make decisions and change things.
The rest of the characters are less fleshed out, not in a badly written way, but in a way that most of this story is about Sophie. The rest of them are a strange bunch, and besides her friend, whom I also disliked at times, the rest just seem like she would really be better off without them. During the novel, we watch her form two romantic relationships, with Finn – whom she's liked since forever, and Rory – a friend of a friend, whom she just met. Now, from my perspective, Finn seems like a pretty awful friend and an even worse dating option, while at the beginning Rory seems like the obvious choice she avoids making. I will say that for about half of the book, when one of them was on page I kept thinking it's the other one – not because they're similar, they're not, but simply because Sophie's apathetic way of narrating really made no difference in whom she was interacting with, or talking about. Now, my mixing them up aside, this is the aspect of the book I, for the most part, enjoyed. While I haven't enjoyed it as much in the first half of the book, the second half of the book really has a good point to make regarding relationships, and what you think you want and what you think you need. This is an excellent discussion point because it really brings to light that things are not always how they seem, and how quickly everything can change in an unpredictable manner, including your needs and wants. I liked the realistic portrayal of how ruthless the world can be in some situations even when you've done nothing to deserve it (and you yourself have been dealt a bad hand actually). I am being deliberately vague, so as to not include spoilers, but be aware that there are discussions of consent and one scene where consent is very questionable at best.
As I mentioned, most side characters are seen in passing, and none of them are particularly good or likable. I enjoy my fair share of irredeemable, bad characters but those types of characters still have something about them that draws you in, while these characters simply had nothing. I usually avoid saying this, but I found all of the characters (Sophie included) simply too annoying. Sophie's family also provided much frustration for me, as they were terrible to her (and in general), but packaged with a nice bow. They invalidated her (for once perfectly valid) feelings towards her sister, and in general acted like she was less than her twin. There was no real resolution to any conflict that arose in the book (or no true resolution anyways), and that also added to me disliking this book, as it seemed to tell the reader that every thing, even the little ones are like pointless to try and solve. I do know that this is not the point, and I do absolutely understand what this book was trying to achieve, but that is not what I feel it ended up doing. I feel like there was just too much of trying to be profound by overly simplifying it, but I simply don't feel like the book achieved its point.
Especially regarding that rift in the sky – that was slightly perplexing to me, which I do suppose is the point. It is definitely a response to covid (and worsening climate situation I suppose), which brought out mass apathy and misdirected concern or otherwise commentary on it, but I truly didn't get what this book was trying to achieve. There was nothing that really made me see a new side of all of that, or look at it through a different lens – it was more along the lines of yes, social media bad, climate change real, people not reacting properly, but we all know this. Maybe the simplicity of it was the point, maybe it was supposed to tell us we are all too comfortable with everything happening, but I didn't feel that while reading. It simply felt like it was trying so hard to be profound, but falling just a bit short of it every time.
All in all, this book really wasn't for me. That being said, I don't think it is a bad book, and I don't think you shouldn't read it if you're interested. I really did like the idea of it, and I still think it is a good concept to explore – so maybe you will find it fits your taste better than it did mine!
Thank you to Netgalley for providing me with an arc in exchange for an honest review.