Many thanks to NetGalley and the publisher, Severn House for this Advanced Reader Copy and the opportunity to review The Knight’s Tale. All opinions are my own.
Lionel, Duke of Clarence is dead – in a locked room – and Geoffrey Chaucer, aided by his friends Richard and Hugh Glanville are soon convinced it wasn’t a natural death. Enough to forego his paid-for pilgrimage to Canterbury to investigate. This task forms the basis of The Knight’s Tale by M.J. Trow, the first in the series featuring Chaucer, who in real life had been a member of the duke’s court and was a civil servant for the King at the time our story takes place, in 1380.
It’s determined that the duke was poisoned – and, we’re off. There are plenty of suspects. The mistress, of course, whom no one likes. There’s a priest that Chaucer is suspicious about, but he’s out of the picture pretty quickly. There’s even a possibility that a woman from Chaucer’s past is involved. Then there’s the duke’s Italian countess and her family; a blood-feud, perhaps? Trying to solve a murder he may be, but a man has to eat; Chaucer gets to taste pasta for the first time, and the author lets him describe it for us. A treat.
We get a day of “Clare Pageants,” passion plays (whose titles are hilarious), to cap the investigation. Chaucer figures everything out, of course, at some cost to himself. But all’s well that ends well, as that other fellow will tell us. “Beware the smiler with the knife,” as Chaucer himself recounts, in his own Canterbury Tales.
The tone of the dialog is very modern, as is the dialog itself in many places. The book thus tends to have a “less than medieval feel” throughout. Some readers will find this not to their liking, others may consider it an acceptable change of pace. But there are wordscapes here, and there is humor in the telling. Geoffrey Chaucer makes a satisfactory detective, in The Knight’s Tale.