Martin Gardner, autor licznych książek o nauce, matematyce i filozofii, przedstawia antologię, składającą się z 34 błyskotliwych esejów pióra znakomitych filozofów, uczonych i pisarzy. Zostały one uzupełnione przez Gardnera biograficznymi komentarzami, dzięki którym książka ta stanowi również swego rodzaju kompendium wiedzy nie tylko o podstawowych ideach współczesnego świata, lecz także o jego twórcach. Jak jednak Gardner zastrzega się w przedmowie, zbiór ten nie powstał po to, by wpoić Czytelnikowi pojęcia nauki nowożytnej, czy wyjaśnić jej odkrycia. "Celem tej książki jest ukazanie (...) niezwykłego przepychu wspaniałej literatury - wciągających, zmuszających do myślenia utworów, które mają coś ważnego do powiedzenia na temat nauki, a czynią to pięknie i dobitnie."
Martin Gardner was an American mathematics and science writer specializing in recreational mathematics, but with interests encompassing micromagic, stage magic, literature (especially the writings of Lewis Carroll), philosophy, scientific skepticism, and religion. He wrote the Mathematical Games column in Scientific American from 1956 to 1981, and published over 70 books.
What I liked most about this book was it's variety of essays, some of which I never would have read by themselves. At the same time some of the essays seemed fairly irrelevant. All in all it was an enjoyable read. I especially liked the (completely dated) essay which talked about the certainty of vegetation on Mars, while it doesn't reflect contemporary thought it was interesting to read something which was written with some degree of certainty and which has proved to be far from the truth. The change in thought is progress and without it life would be somewhat less interesting.
It has taken me ages to read this book, a collection of essays in Science, mainly physics. Some of them were profound, deeply moving, and others very dated. Some were written so technically that I gave up on them. But despite the age of the book, I enjoyed (most) of the essays in it.
The title is somewhat misleading. A few of the essays are truly great, and some others are interesting. A few are so unreadable as to be incomprehensible.
So many great essays indeed (although some are quite obsolete, mind though I was reading the first published edition from 1940s). Although, I think I must admit I often have problems reading essays, oops.