The first time I saw Sheriff David Clarke was on a YouTube clip of Don Lemon's show on CNN (I would never willingly watch a Fake News network such as theirs). This was in the wake of the Baton Rouge shootings perpetrated by a Black Lives Matter terrorist which left three officers dead and three others wounded. Don Lemon had Sheriff Clarke on the show that night and asked him if the police community's response to these murders was that of "peace" and "unity." Sheriff Clarke was not having any of that politically correct crap, not after his fellow officers were killed in the line of duty. Without missing a beat, he swiftly took control of the interview and asked Lemon if he honestly believed that anyone would have such a weak message during these dire times. He plainly stated that the police were under attack thanks to the racist rhetoric of terrorist organizations like Black Lives Matter; Lemon was taken aback and could hardly muster a coherent response to Clarke's astute statements. He continued to speak firmly and concisely regarding the lack of protests and outrage over the deaths of the police officers, whereas riots would break out at every instance of a police shooting of a black American, justified or not. Lemon couldn't figure out what was going on! He seemed all too eager to end the interview with Sheriff Clarke and finally silence the man who had made him look and sound like an absolute fool (more so than usual, that is). Clarke made his point loud and clear: a war has been declared on the American police officer, and it was about time someone took a stand against this appalling crusade which seeks to demonize and persecute the men and women who sacrifice everything to uphold law and order.
And so, I was introduced to one of the sharpest and most fearless political minds in America today.
In Cop Under Fire, Sheriff Clarke presents a uniquely qualified perspective on the issues plaguing America today. As a product of a blue-collar African American family, and as an officer of the law for nearly 40 years, Clarke is able to shine a light on the realities of being both a black man and a police officer in today's America. His insight does not come from a singular source, but rather from a combined set of life experiences. He understands race relations on a far deeper level than most talking-heads on the news these days because he has lived through adversity himself. He sees through the facade of Black Lives Matter and calls them out for being the race-baiting, hate-spreading terror group that they are. At the same time, he calls out our ineffective and incompetent federal government for the various ways in which it promotes an unsafe America and, by proxy, prevents African American families from prospering. He doesn't blindly choose a side by ignoring the intricacies of each individual situation – he acknowledges how complex these issues are and offers rational answers to help solve them.
One of my favorite things about Cop Under Fire is that it unabashedly supports Blue Lives in an age that seems geared mostly towards demonizing law enforcement and making them out to be inherently racist killers. Police officers have one of the most difficult occupations in America today – upholding the law and protecting innocent civilians in the face of constant danger. For the most part, this is a thankless job, and it often yields much criticism and malign as opposed to the praise and celebration it truly deserves. In recent years, the police have been accused of being institutionally prejudice against minorities because of several instances involving supposedly unjustified shootings of black men. What's worse, our politicians have been bending over backwards to admonish our police by reaffirming the belief that they are all just racist killers with a badge. Think about how much that must hurt a well-meaning police officer who only wishes to make a difference in his or her local community; it's a damn shame! Yet despite these allegations and attacks on the police, they manage to put on their uniforms each day to serve and protect their friends, families, and neighbors. All the while, regular Americans like myself watch in horror as protestors, news anchors, and politicians threaten their livelihood, reputation, and safety for political and social gain. Sheriff Clarke knows all too well that the police are under attack on several fronts, and he makes it clear that he stands with them and their righteous cause wholeheartedly. As an avid supporter of the police and law enforcement, I am glad to see someone with authority stick their neck out for those who deserve it; you will be hard pressed to find much public support for the police nowadays thanks to misinformation and hatred causing people to fear and despise those who have taken a vow of duty to protect them.
Sheriff Clarke touches on a number of topics in Cop Under Fire. He talks about the post-9/11 America being just as unsafe as before those horrific attacks on out freedom and sovereignty. He discusses the double standards of being a conservative African American who does not conform to the mold of a "typical black man," as he states it, as enforced by liberal social justice warriors. Sheriff Clarke dissects each of the major police-related deaths of African American men and proves that none of them were racially motivated by supposedly "racist" cops. His views may be controversial, but they spoke to me in a way that most politicians and news anchors have not been able to – he speaks the truth, unabated by political loyalties and special interests, in an age when one wrong opinion can get you de-personed online and shunned from society.
Though I tended to agree with the vast majority of what Sheriff Clarke spoke about in his book, I found him to be a little too religious for my liking. He felt that religion was under attack in America, but I don't agree with that. In fact, I think religion has too much standing in our policy and governing, which causes more harm than good in many cases. Though I respect Clarke's religious point of view, I don't think it was wholly appropriate to imply that religious liberties needed to be strengthened even more so than they already are. For example, he didn't see any problem with integrating religion into his mandatory police briefings. This, of course, is an infringement on the religious liberties of those in the police force who do not worship the same religion as Clarke. Since this was a mandatory meeting in the department, they did not have the option of walking out to avoid having to be subjected to a conflicting set of beliefs and values. Though Sheriff Clarke has a right to follow whatever religion he wants to, he does not have the right to impose that religious view unto others who are unwilling to have their convictions challenged or demeaned. As someone who is not too fond of any religion in general, I know I would like to have my personal views respected and not have to be subjected to religious lectures whilst at work. On this front, I do not agree at all with Sheriff Clarke.
On a technical note, I felt that Cop Under Fire could have benefited from having a more concise focus throughout. That is to say, I felt that, at times, the book did not follow a very clear-cut narrative or point, and it consequently felt a little erratic and vague in some of its messaging. For example, he discusses the TSA and its ineptitude regarding airline safety in the post 9/11 America. Even though he eventually gets to his point about the government's overreach and ineffectiveness, I thought he took a rather considerable detour from the rest of his book when he started this particular chapter. Had he made his point in a more fluid and smoothly flowing manner, he would have made his book more consistent and his message less muddled, and thus more straightforward to read. This is mostly excusable, however, since the book does not suffer too harshly from any of these moments.
In closing, Sheriff Clarke is a political outlier, and that enrages a lot of people. He ran for Sheriff of Milwaukee as a Democrat, yet he is an avowed conservative. His views do not perfectly fit into either of the two major political parties, making him difficult to assess by the standards of mainstream politics and media, and that utterly terrifies them. His mixed political beliefs, although aggravating to partisan news hosts and politicians, perfectly embodies the majority of Americans and their assorted, multifaceted beliefs. You may not agree with what Sheriff Clarke says in his book, but he is proof that Americans do not always fall cleanly into the "Republican" or "Democrat" camps, and in actuality hold a variety of beliefs and convictions. I can personally attest to this fact, for even I exemplify this form of nonconformist political ideology as a Centrist who supports Trump yet believes in many liberal policy stances. The Milwaukee Sheriff teaches us that hyper-partisanism is a detriment to a free society, whereas a combination of rational ideas and commonsense thinking – which transcends political party lines – is what will help carry America out of the abyss of these trying times and into a brighter future for all Americans regardless of race, class, ethnicity, religious belief, gender, or any other grouping.