A good overview of what it says in the title. Woodford goes over all sorts of types of myth & art, whether myth informing art, art informing myth, myth vs. historical fact, etc. She also briefly touches on the fact that sometimes no one can figure out exactly what is being depicted, using the Parthenon Frieze & Portland Vase as examples. Her writing is easy to read, even funny in parts-- though i don't know if that's intentional or just me-- though at times it can be repetitive, even reiterating information just discussed in the last section. But since i originally bought this for an art history class, & readings were assigned sometimes out of order, this makes a little more sense, if Woodford wrote the book with this in mind.
There are many illustrations throughout, directly discussed in the text as examples of different points. They're all in black & white, but are clear. In some cases where it's difficult to see what's going on in the original work, such as something that's missing a lot of visual information or Roman sarcophagi, there's an accompanying drawing that clarifies the composition & allows you to see more clearly who & what is being discussed.
The book is a very good introduction to the various ways in which myths & related stories were depicted in art & even influenced by it, & how dynamics changed throughout time. You also become familiarized with certain myths in order to identify scenes & characters involved in them, & how to sometimes tell them apart. Woodford explains all the different ways to identify what's being depicted, & how to apply those methods when looking at works not discussed in the text. And the inclusion of the Parthenon Frieze & Portland Vase at the end, with the differing scholarly interpretations, reminds the reader that not everything is known or cut & dry, & even leads them to develop their own ideas, using the foundation of information laid by the rest of the book.