#Unforgiven – Liz McGregor
#JonathanBallPublishers
‘An enthralling account of the journey by a daughter to meet with the man convicted of her father’s murder.’ (Trevor Manuel)
Two days after her mother’s ashes was buried, Robin McGregor, father of journalist Liz McGregor, is murdered in his Tulbagh home. That day, 11 August 2008, would be a Damascus experience for the author and this memoir is the result. In her own words: ‘…I have always written my way out of despair. Simply recording and describing how I am feeling, and why, has always proven cathartic and shown me a way forward.’ (71)
Although Cecil Thomas was sentenced to 30 years imprisonment for the murder of her father, a lack of closure started the author’s journey to meet him, hoping to find answers when looking into his eyes, because ‘One of the difficulties of losing a loved one to murder is that closure is so much more complex.’ (21). There is no grieving in private; no silent coming to terms with the loss; the surviving loved ones often experience feelings of helplessness; of being swallowed by a huge bureaucratic machine of remaining a victim: ‘Being a victim intimate passivity, a lack of agency, someone to whom things are done…’ (226)
It is impossible to read the author’s words regarding her painful journey ‘My brain went into panic mode at the time… The alarm that went off then is still ringing. I am still on constant high alert for disaster.’ (70) and ‘It’s a truism to say that parents are always a part of their children…It’s not just the DNA they share… but also the way their voices are lodged in each other’s heads…’ (210) without empathy. She shares her innermost feelings in a brutally honest way; sadly, thousands of South Africans will be able to identify with her emotional journey, especially in respect of the effect of violent crime on those left behind in a country where so-called correctional centres have become universities of crime.
Although it is made very clear that the feelings, experiences and impressions shared in the book are those of the author, personally, a few paragraphs did not sit well with me. She states: ‘A murder trial is not about the victim. He or she is simply the backdrop to a contest between state and accused, each trying to attest the supremacy of its own narrative.’ (24) Whilst the first part is factually correct in respect of criminal cases, the latter sweeping statement is insulting to those in the legal profession proud of doing their jobs correctly and ethically. A similar statement is repeated when comparing restorative justice to retributive justice; ‘The theory is that the latter marginalises the victim and instead privileges professional – judge, lawyers, police. The offender’s deeds are seen as a crime against the laws of the state…’ (137) Whilst the latter part is indeed correct, it is painting an incomplete picture, failing to mention that although that is the worldwide nature of a criminal system, a system does exist that focuses solely on the rights of victims, namely the civil law. The author thus incorrectly creates the impression that the only system in operation is the penal option; that is simply not true and is blatantly ignoring all the available civil sanctions.
Whilst attending a victim-offender workshop, the author observes individuals injured in the Worcester bombing by the ‘Wit Wolwe’ on Christmas Eve, 1996, and comments: ‘They were random victims of crazed white supremacists…’ (171) This is a very poor choice of words; the suggestion that the perpetrators were mentally unstable or suffered from diminished capacity criminal has no factual basis.
Despite the misgivings regarding the aspects in the previous paragraphs, the memoir is brave, thought provoking and eloquently written. My heart ached reading one of the closing statements: ‘I have become increasingly aware of the shadow world that underlies our seemingly neat and ordered one.’ (251) It is an important book; an eye-opener creating awareness of the ever-increasing aftereffects of crime on society.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
#Uitdieperdsebek