I wanted to love this book. I was beyond excited when I discovered its existence, and I placed a hold at my library as soon as they ordered it, pre-publication date. And I anxiously waited.
Unfortunately...this book did not meet expectations. (If I'm honest, this probably would have gotten 3 stars if I hadn't been anticipating it so much and felt so let down by the way the information was presented.) It does have a lot of good information, and this is absolutely a subject that should be explored, but there were also a lot of misses in this book. For starters, the structure left it open for a lot of repetition, which could have been avoided if they had decided to talk about different movies for the different sections, but several movies make several appearances, and yes, they may touch on the different points the authors are making, but there's something to be said for editing and selecting. (It's kind of wild to me how many times Karen is brought up, when the only reason I know about it is because a YouTuber I watch who reviews bad movies talked about it, and even she was severely unimpressed.)
I was expecting it to be more of a chronological study exploring how representation shifted with the times. The Stereotypes chapter, especially, could have benefited from a bit of this, showing how "The Spook," for example, started as a derogatory laugh-at character, but then it was claimed by the Black community and shifted. (The book does acknowledge this claim and change, but that was in a different chapter, I believe the chapter about Black Horror Comedies.) I also took some issue at the authors' attachment of The Seductress stereotype every time a black woman character is overtly sexual (the insinuation that Elizabeth in The Perfection walks the line of Seductress because she was more forward at the beginning is just flabbergasting).
Which leads to another problem for me: a lot of the examples or statistics were quite flimsy and would take me out of the point completely, which is a real shame, since there are several solid points to be had. But when you include Will Smith in I Am Legend as an example of The Rapper in a Horror Movie stereotype (that's like saying Dwayne Johnson in The Fast and the Furious movies is the Wrestler stereotype; sure, it's true, that was his profession at one point, but he is an established actor), or Lupita Nyong'o in Us as an example of Black Oscar Winners whose "Oscar nod [couldn't] necessarily shield performers from Hollywood's racial pecking order" (I recognize that this was cheeky phrasing and intended as humor, but it would have been the same list to show off what amazing Black Talent is present in horror), or including the pilot from Jurassic World: Dominion in the list of Black lesbian representation in horror because at one point she says she "has a thing for red-heads" in reference to Bryce Dallas Howard (WHY are we including Jurassic World: Dominion in a horror review??? and it says more than you're suggesting if that is the best representation you can pull) how am I not supposed to be taken aback? There's enough Black Horror to not include these loosy-goosy "examples" or repeat the same movie over and over (or include just plain non-horror movies).
I also felt the sexuality representation chapter, which is what closes out the book, so...weak closer for me, was quite off-base. While I feel like obtuseness and lack of recognition of nuance were peppered generously throughout the book's analysis of several movies/characters, in the section about LGBTQ+ representation, the authors note, "While the prevailing narrative is that the Black community is more homophobic than America as a whole, the truth is more complicated -- as generalities tied to race tend to be," then try to argue that Black voters overwhelmingly voted for Obama after he advocated for same-sex marriage as support for this wrinkle. Then after a long breakdown of a gay couple's portrayal in Blacula, they state, "Outside of Blacula, Black queer representation in American horror was hard to find through the '70s and into the '80s [when blaxploitation films were big, and there actually were several Black filmmakers on the scene]." But let's just dance past what a complete lack of any inclusion by Black filmmakers means. Then there are several examples of more modern Black filmmakers treating homosexuality as a joke if it's about gay men or sexually objectifying if it's about lesbians (and for this conversation, you bet The Seductress stereotype was revisited). But, as I complained that the authors don't seem to recognize nuance/horror-as-a-whole trends, I should acknowledge that these sexuality representation issues are all-around cultural/trends in movies in general issues, not just Black filmmakers or Black representation, but the way the book presents the issue is somewhat sloppy. On a positive note for this section, I was fascinated by the fact that "the overwhelming majority of gay relationships involving a Black partner are interracial...It's as if Blackness is okay, and queerness is okay, but the 'otherness quotient' that comes with seeing two Black queer people together has been deemed too much for audiences to handle." An actual statistic would have been nice, but based on the movies I can think of and they list, I'll buy it.
Overall, the way this book was written, it kind of felt like the authors just don't like horror movies (except The Purge; they LOVE The Purge franchise**), and while I understand a lot of the point of the book is how Blacks have been woefully underused/misrepresented in horror (True), I still feel like there was some ill-faith criticism that shone through. (They claim The Voice of Reason stereotype is "an outgrowth of the belief in Black superstition that helped give rise to the Spook. The Voice of Reason is more reserved and worldly than the Spook, of course, and is more appropriately apprehensive than piss-pants scared, but as with all the stereotypes on this list, the lines between the can blur faster than Robin Thicke's marital vows," and there are several paragraphs lampooning Snakes on a Plane and how it crowd-sourced "I have had it with these m'f'ing snakes on this m'f'ing plane," and audiences wanting Samuel L Jackson to...Samuel L Jackson and an insinuation that the White audience is laughing at him. I genuinely don't remember that movie, except for that line, which was in all the trailers, but it would not be my first instinct to classify that as a horror movie...or that anyone is laughing *at* SLJ.)
Quote of the Book for Me: "Films written or directed by people of color in 2020 had significantly more diverse casts than those written or directed by white men." (No durr...)
**I'm kind of surprised there's not more criticism in this book about the first Purge movie. I remember walking out of that movie thinking, 'Man, they could have done something with that premise, but then they completely side-stepped it.' They picked up the social commentary in the later movies, but that first one really felt like a miss to me.