3.5 stars. I appreciated the author re-grounding Charlotte Badger's life in the most probable vs the most exaggerated. In telling what often happened to women in her circumstances, you learn how harsh it was to be poor, and doubly so for a woman. How frustrating that so much of your life was beyond your ability to control, and yet you were damned for it all the same.
She quotes novelist Hilary Mantel, "We reach into the past for the foundation myths of our tribe, our nation, and found them on glory, or found them on grievance, but we seldom found them on cold facts...As soon as we die, we enter into fiction...Once we can no longer speak for ourselves, we are interpreted."
The author notes how crime appears tied to dearth or want, as it parallels rising requests for poor relief. However, it is also tied to the rise of a middle class trying to protect what is theirs as the proportion of victims choosing to prosecute executed 10, 20, or even 50 times more influence on indictment levels than changed in the number of actual thefts. "Victims of theft, particularly those who had accumulated wealth in the new industrial age and could now afford to buy the type of consumer goods that demonstrated their affluence and respectability, were reluctant to see their possessions taken from them and were determined to do something about it."
In addition, jurors were all property owners who were more likely to align with the aggrieved victims.
At any rate, each generation of writer has reinterpreted her life story to meet their needs and fit the author's times and morality, as opposed to the reality of Charlotte's life. This is especially evident if you look at the themes of female convict, NZ frontier, and her place in both.