What do you think?
Rate this book
The Truth and Beauty: How the Lives and Works of England's Greatest Poets Point the Way to a Deeper Understanding of the Words of Jesus
Follow Andrew Klavan to a deeper, richer understanding of the words of Jesus.
Andrew Klavan had a problem: Much of what Jesus said puzzled him. He believed what he read in the Gospels, but he struggled to understand what Jesus really meant. So he began a journey of wrestling with the beautiful and often strange words of Jesus.
He learned Greek in order to read the Gospels in their original languages, and he vowed to set aside any preconceptions about what the Scriptures say. But it wasn't until he began exploring how some of history's greatest writers wrestled with the same issues we confront today--political upheaval, rejection of social norms, growing disbelief in God--that he found a new way of understanding what Jesus meant.
In The Truth and Beauty, Klavan combines a decades-long writing career with a lifetime of reading to discover a fresh understanding of the Gospels. By reading the words of Jesus through the life and work of writers such as William Wordsworth and John Keats, Mary Shelley and Samuel Taylor Coleridge--the English romantics--Klavan discovered a way to encounter Jesus in a deeper and more profound way than ever before.
For readers seeking to find renewed meaning in the words of Jesus--and for those who are striving for belief in a materialistic world--The Truth and Beauty offers an intimate account of one man's struggle to understand the Gospels in all their strangeness, and so find his way to a life that is, as he says, "the most creative, the most joyful, and surely the most true." You can find it too.
Andrew Klavan had a problem: Much of what Jesus said puzzled him. He believed what he read in the Gospels, but he struggled to understand what Jesus really meant. So he began a journey of wrestling with the beautiful and often strange words of Jesus.
He learned Greek in order to read the Gospels in their original languages, and he vowed to set aside any preconceptions about what the Scriptures say. But it wasn't until he began exploring how some of history's greatest writers wrestled with the same issues we confront today--political upheaval, rejection of social norms, growing disbelief in God--that he found a new way of understanding what Jesus meant.
In The Truth and Beauty, Klavan combines a decades-long writing career with a lifetime of reading to discover a fresh understanding of the Gospels. By reading the words of Jesus through the life and work of writers such as William Wordsworth and John Keats, Mary Shelley and Samuel Taylor Coleridge--the English romantics--Klavan discovered a way to encounter Jesus in a deeper and more profound way than ever before.
For readers seeking to find renewed meaning in the words of Jesus--and for those who are striving for belief in a materialistic world--The Truth and Beauty offers an intimate account of one man's struggle to understand the Gospels in all their strangeness, and so find his way to a life that is, as he says, "the most creative, the most joyful, and surely the most true." You can find it too.
Audiobook
Published January 1, 2022
374 people are currently reading
2279 people want to read
About the author
Andrew Klavan
103 books2,356 followersReference for now:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_K...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_K...
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 284 reviews
February 21, 2023
Not being a fan of politics anymore, I was not exactly excited about this book which was sent to me by a friend. Maybe that is why I was pleasantly delighted by this book.
My first worry was that it would be one of the increasingly popular evangelical virtue mongering books that seem completely ignorant of the dismal history of virtue. Not so here. Klavan understands that there is mystery here and not 12 steps.
Chapter three was my favorite with the simply profound idea that Frankenstein’s monster was a motherless being.
My first worry was that it would be one of the increasingly popular evangelical virtue mongering books that seem completely ignorant of the dismal history of virtue. Not so here. Klavan understands that there is mystery here and not 12 steps.
Chapter three was my favorite with the simply profound idea that Frankenstein’s monster was a motherless being.
May 17, 2022
I don’t know that I’ve ever read a book that misrepresented itself so badly through the title and back cover synopsis. Given the lengthy and specific title, The Truth and Beauty: How the Lives and Works of England’s Greatest Poets Point the Way to a Deeper Understanding of the Words of Jesus, Andrew Klavan’s central thesis seems fairly clear: By understanding the English romantics, we can come to a better understanding of Jesus. Why, then, does Klavan continually litter condescending and irrelevant culture war drivel? Some examples:
“A police officer shoots a violent black criminal—or is the cop the criminal and the black man a victim of a system that privileges whiteness so that his criminality is really a kind of justice?” (p. 65)
“Through the miracle of science, a woman can now medicate her body so that men may use it for pleasure without consequence or attachment.” (p. 88)
“Viewers who did not go into ecstasies over a wooden piece of second-rate silliness like Black Panther were suspected of being racist because the hero was black.” (p. 92)
“Perhaps so-called sex change operations will no longer be a cosmetic illusion reinforced by this misuse of him and her pronouns, but a genuine fact of technological life. Perhaps then the humanizing tasks of femininity—creating life out of matter, homes out of houses, minds out of brains, and souls out of bodies—will fall equally on the genders…” (p. 94)
“The marketplace does not want to lose its women workers to the nursery. The state does not want to cede its power to the fathers of families. In material terms, it’s unfair; it’s oppressive. So the world is sure to turn to its science and technology and social systems to ‘solving the problem’ of gender, which is really just the problem of femininity and its core in spiritual action. The world will learn to grow babies in machines, to nurture them in institutions, to free women for the market, to strip men of their authority, to make us the same.” (p. 183)
From beginning to end, The Truth and Beauty reads more like the mental breakdown of a man scared that women not being barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen will be society’s doom. (You can imagine, then what he thinks of the lives of the English romantics—proto-feminist Mary Shelley, in particular.) In this book, there is little truth, scant beauty, and barely anything of Jesus.
Indeed, the words of Jesus are barely discussed at all, relegated to the book’s final section. Klavan is not a biblical scholar or theologian, nor is he a pastor or in any way trained in reading or exegeting Scripture. That amateurism shows. For literary effect, he reworks the chronology of Jesus to place the wedding at Cana near the end of Jesus’s ministry—because it better fits the narrative he wants to establish about Mary. He elevates Milton’s creation hierarchy to the level of inspired Word, writing that man was made for God and woman was made for the God in man. He fundamentally misunderstands the purpose of Jesus weeping at Lazarus’s grave, positing that Jesus is crying over mankind’s blindness and sin. He offers a flawed and banal interpretation of the Sermon on the Mount. And all of these comes in an unfocused meandering ramble that I suppose Klavan felt sounded mystical.
The Truth and the Beauty is a poor front for Klavan to spout racist and sexist ideologies under the guise of teaching readers about the English romantics and Jesus. He accomplishes neither. There is little to redeem this book, save for some artful phrases about the nature of story. Zondervan should be ashamed that they’ve published this.
“A police officer shoots a violent black criminal—or is the cop the criminal and the black man a victim of a system that privileges whiteness so that his criminality is really a kind of justice?” (p. 65)
“Through the miracle of science, a woman can now medicate her body so that men may use it for pleasure without consequence or attachment.” (p. 88)
“Viewers who did not go into ecstasies over a wooden piece of second-rate silliness like Black Panther were suspected of being racist because the hero was black.” (p. 92)
“Perhaps so-called sex change operations will no longer be a cosmetic illusion reinforced by this misuse of him and her pronouns, but a genuine fact of technological life. Perhaps then the humanizing tasks of femininity—creating life out of matter, homes out of houses, minds out of brains, and souls out of bodies—will fall equally on the genders…” (p. 94)
“The marketplace does not want to lose its women workers to the nursery. The state does not want to cede its power to the fathers of families. In material terms, it’s unfair; it’s oppressive. So the world is sure to turn to its science and technology and social systems to ‘solving the problem’ of gender, which is really just the problem of femininity and its core in spiritual action. The world will learn to grow babies in machines, to nurture them in institutions, to free women for the market, to strip men of their authority, to make us the same.” (p. 183)
From beginning to end, The Truth and Beauty reads more like the mental breakdown of a man scared that women not being barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen will be society’s doom. (You can imagine, then what he thinks of the lives of the English romantics—proto-feminist Mary Shelley, in particular.) In this book, there is little truth, scant beauty, and barely anything of Jesus.
Indeed, the words of Jesus are barely discussed at all, relegated to the book’s final section. Klavan is not a biblical scholar or theologian, nor is he a pastor or in any way trained in reading or exegeting Scripture. That amateurism shows. For literary effect, he reworks the chronology of Jesus to place the wedding at Cana near the end of Jesus’s ministry—because it better fits the narrative he wants to establish about Mary. He elevates Milton’s creation hierarchy to the level of inspired Word, writing that man was made for God and woman was made for the God in man. He fundamentally misunderstands the purpose of Jesus weeping at Lazarus’s grave, positing that Jesus is crying over mankind’s blindness and sin. He offers a flawed and banal interpretation of the Sermon on the Mount. And all of these comes in an unfocused meandering ramble that I suppose Klavan felt sounded mystical.
The Truth and the Beauty is a poor front for Klavan to spout racist and sexist ideologies under the guise of teaching readers about the English romantics and Jesus. He accomplishes neither. There is little to redeem this book, save for some artful phrases about the nature of story. Zondervan should be ashamed that they’ve published this.
July 22, 2022
"I want to know how to become the man God made me to be, how to do the works he created me to do. I trust Him with the big questions of eternity. I trust Him with the end of days...I want to know what it looks like to live … to the fullest."
- Andrew Klavan
This was a slow burner but became something of an inferno by the end. I was in and out with him until the latter portion of the book. Some parts were a bit dubious exegetically, I think, and I would juxtapose his readings of key Gospel stories with others.
However, I loved the parts of the book critiquing transhumanism and its anti-woman biases, the section on the Trinity and fractals, parts about the metaphorical nature of all language, portions about the grammar of the body, & bits and pieces about the poets turbulent spiritual lives. So, I'm going to rate it highly because they really clicked in my mind and spoke to the heart.
Andrew is a skilful writer, whose slower and clearer thinking far transcends his political persona. I wish more people would read him as a serious thinker, because he has much to say that is worthwhile. That became evident in the latter stages of this book, as it has done to me in reading his articles. Such as the one for City Journal: 'Can We Believe?' and his engrossing biography.
He is well-respected as a writer of fiction, across political lines, and rightfully so. But don't sleep on his non-fiction.
- Andrew Klavan
This was a slow burner but became something of an inferno by the end. I was in and out with him until the latter portion of the book. Some parts were a bit dubious exegetically, I think, and I would juxtapose his readings of key Gospel stories with others.
However, I loved the parts of the book critiquing transhumanism and its anti-woman biases, the section on the Trinity and fractals, parts about the metaphorical nature of all language, portions about the grammar of the body, & bits and pieces about the poets turbulent spiritual lives. So, I'm going to rate it highly because they really clicked in my mind and spoke to the heart.
Andrew is a skilful writer, whose slower and clearer thinking far transcends his political persona. I wish more people would read him as a serious thinker, because he has much to say that is worthwhile. That became evident in the latter stages of this book, as it has done to me in reading his articles. Such as the one for City Journal: 'Can We Believe?' and his engrossing biography.
He is well-respected as a writer of fiction, across political lines, and rightfully so. But don't sleep on his non-fiction.
May 30, 2022
This book of Andrew Klavan's meditations on how important great poets and writers like William Wordsworth, Lord Byron, Percy Shelley, Mary Shelley, William Shakespeare, and John Keats convey goodness, beauty, and truth, and how he correlates that to Jesus of Nazareth being the source of all goodness, truth, and beauty-The Word, The Logos, and The Truth Incarnate, does make for a fascinating and moving read.
I really appreciate Klavan's emphasis on the importance of literature and art to humanity, his references to my favorite writer, C. S. Lewis, and his delving into the paradoxes found in Jesus of Nazareth's first century teachings. Whatever your worldview, I highly recommend this book.
I really appreciate Klavan's emphasis on the importance of literature and art to humanity, his references to my favorite writer, C. S. Lewis, and his delving into the paradoxes found in Jesus of Nazareth's first century teachings. Whatever your worldview, I highly recommend this book.
April 11, 2022
The New Romantics
Author Andrew Klavan was bummed by the Beatitudes. They read to him like: "Blessed are you when your life is awful, because in heaven, trust me, it's gonna be great." (page 6.) When he realized his problem was trying to understand a philosophy instead of getting to know a person, he determined to read the Gospels with a pure, blank-slate mind: "I ignored every doctrine of theology, including those of the apostle Paul; I wanted Jesus direct, unfiltered by tradition." (p. 5.) That didn't help: "It wasn't just the Sermon on the Mount that I found odd and blurry. It was almost all blurry and all odd." (p. 10.) So he turned back to philosophy - way back - to the Romanticism of the early 1800s, and began "reconstructing Jesus" accordingly. (pp. 167-228.)
Romanticism has become something of a fad for Christians in search of meaning in our post-Christian, post-Modern times. See, e.g., Romantic Religion by R. J. Reilly; Faith, Hope and Poetry: Theology and the Poetic Imagination by Malcom Guite; Union with Christ: The Way to Know and Enjoy God by Rankin Wilbourne; The Imagination of God: Art, Creativity and Truth in the Bible by Brian Godawa; Apologetics and the Christian Imagination by Holly Ordway. But Romanticism was short-lived for a reason, and the new Romantics have singularly failed to warrant its revival.
After the Enlightenment reduced the universe to meaningless matter in motion, Romanticism endeavored to re-enchant the world. While its poets promised a spiritual reality beyond what the eyes can see, all they delivered were metaphors about spiritual things derived from their perceptions of the natural world. The poet might speak of beholding heaven in a dew drop but all he really saw was the dew drop; heaven was only imagined. People who wanted a real heaven eventually discovered the poets only offered an imaginary one, and so Romanticism withered away.
The author here offers nothing more than the original Romantics, namely, metaphors. Jesus is a metaphor, your life is a metaphor, metaphors are metaphors for other metaphors, and its "metaphors all the way down," says Klavan. (p. 175.) Like the old Romantics, the new ones never reach a spiritual reality. Nature is as close as we can get to a spiritual realm because, the poets tell us, Nature is a metaphor for the kingdom of heaven. And that kingdom is within us. We create it with our imaginations, or rather, the poets create it for us as they are better at imagining stuff.
One thing the original Romantics held in common with their philosophical foes, the Materialists, was the Kantian view that the perceived world was the only one accessible to human understanding, and ultimate reality - if it existed at all - was unknowable. Thus the Romantics declared that if the world was to be infused with spiritual life, the poets had to first create then put it there. Samuel Coleridge wrote, "Ah! From the soul itself must issue forth; A light, a glory, a fair luminous cloud; Enveloping the Earth--." With God's reality unreachable, the poets claimed for themselves the divine right to create their own. Coleridge described his imaginative powers as "a repetition in the finite mind of the eternal act of creation in the infinite I AM" and poet-philosopher Johann Gottfried Herder wrote, "The artist is become a creator God."
Of course, today's Christian Romantics cannot be so bold as their 19th Century predecessors. They must at least pay lip-service to the existence of a real, ultimate Triune God about whom something true can be known. Klavan tries, but he's not very convincing: "I believe with all my heart that God is three persons, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, but if it turns out he's five guys named Moe, I'm not going to cancel my vacation." (p. 6.)
And that, my friends, is the author's deeper understanding of the Gospels gleaned from England's greatest poets.
Author Andrew Klavan was bummed by the Beatitudes. They read to him like: "Blessed are you when your life is awful, because in heaven, trust me, it's gonna be great." (page 6.) When he realized his problem was trying to understand a philosophy instead of getting to know a person, he determined to read the Gospels with a pure, blank-slate mind: "I ignored every doctrine of theology, including those of the apostle Paul; I wanted Jesus direct, unfiltered by tradition." (p. 5.) That didn't help: "It wasn't just the Sermon on the Mount that I found odd and blurry. It was almost all blurry and all odd." (p. 10.) So he turned back to philosophy - way back - to the Romanticism of the early 1800s, and began "reconstructing Jesus" accordingly. (pp. 167-228.)
Romanticism has become something of a fad for Christians in search of meaning in our post-Christian, post-Modern times. See, e.g., Romantic Religion by R. J. Reilly; Faith, Hope and Poetry: Theology and the Poetic Imagination by Malcom Guite; Union with Christ: The Way to Know and Enjoy God by Rankin Wilbourne; The Imagination of God: Art, Creativity and Truth in the Bible by Brian Godawa; Apologetics and the Christian Imagination by Holly Ordway. But Romanticism was short-lived for a reason, and the new Romantics have singularly failed to warrant its revival.
After the Enlightenment reduced the universe to meaningless matter in motion, Romanticism endeavored to re-enchant the world. While its poets promised a spiritual reality beyond what the eyes can see, all they delivered were metaphors about spiritual things derived from their perceptions of the natural world. The poet might speak of beholding heaven in a dew drop but all he really saw was the dew drop; heaven was only imagined. People who wanted a real heaven eventually discovered the poets only offered an imaginary one, and so Romanticism withered away.
The author here offers nothing more than the original Romantics, namely, metaphors. Jesus is a metaphor, your life is a metaphor, metaphors are metaphors for other metaphors, and its "metaphors all the way down," says Klavan. (p. 175.) Like the old Romantics, the new ones never reach a spiritual reality. Nature is as close as we can get to a spiritual realm because, the poets tell us, Nature is a metaphor for the kingdom of heaven. And that kingdom is within us. We create it with our imaginations, or rather, the poets create it for us as they are better at imagining stuff.
One thing the original Romantics held in common with their philosophical foes, the Materialists, was the Kantian view that the perceived world was the only one accessible to human understanding, and ultimate reality - if it existed at all - was unknowable. Thus the Romantics declared that if the world was to be infused with spiritual life, the poets had to first create then put it there. Samuel Coleridge wrote, "Ah! From the soul itself must issue forth; A light, a glory, a fair luminous cloud; Enveloping the Earth--." With God's reality unreachable, the poets claimed for themselves the divine right to create their own. Coleridge described his imaginative powers as "a repetition in the finite mind of the eternal act of creation in the infinite I AM" and poet-philosopher Johann Gottfried Herder wrote, "The artist is become a creator God."
Of course, today's Christian Romantics cannot be so bold as their 19th Century predecessors. They must at least pay lip-service to the existence of a real, ultimate Triune God about whom something true can be known. Klavan tries, but he's not very convincing: "I believe with all my heart that God is three persons, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, but if it turns out he's five guys named Moe, I'm not going to cancel my vacation." (p. 6.)
And that, my friends, is the author's deeper understanding of the Gospels gleaned from England's greatest poets.
April 28, 2022
Utterly fascinating. This book was not what I expected (more of the words of Jesus part) but I loved it (a look at our cultural/philosophical history post-middle ages and how the poets spoke to that out of their spirituality). Klavan had so many intriguing perspectives on things I thought I’d wrapped my head around. I’ll be thinking about this one for a while and I feel like I’ll need to read it in physical copy soon to really digest some things.
June 13, 2022
The beauty of truth in an age of lawlessness
Klaven always has a way of words and making them known to his readers. A discovery of the gospel that urges for more. I want more understanding, more peeling of the walls that surround my heart. How different we are but how much we need the gospel of Christ. It is our sin that keeps us far from God and or realization of that sin draws us near.
Klaven always has a way of words and making them known to his readers. A discovery of the gospel that urges for more. I want more understanding, more peeling of the walls that surround my heart. How different we are but how much we need the gospel of Christ. It is our sin that keeps us far from God and or realization of that sin draws us near.
March 27, 2023
I saw this book online, I knew who Andrew Klaven was, I knew our world perspectives were probably not too different, but it was a NEW book, did I really trust a NEW book to teach me how to read literature? In an act of blind faith, reassured by the title which was composed of my two favorite concepts in this wonderful life (Truth and Beauty), I clicked the order button and held my breath. LOW AND BEHOLD it arrived in a brown parcel and proved to be the exact book my soul needed in the desolate and depressing months of winter. This book is good because it is old because it is based on the old, it will grow even older, it will last. This book needs to be read, it is a book that needs to be annotated and underlined and common-placed.
Andrew Klaven is a man who understands and clearly communicates why Western Civilization matters, it’s not about Geography, it’s about everything that is good and holy in this world, the tradition that is based on the Bible and what Jesus Christ did for us on the cross.
Klaven is honest and comical in a way that is relatable and disarming, the book is brilliant and deep without compromising it’s accessibility and without feeling pedantic, and he has done what few non-fiction writers have achieved: his work is a story. It takes you on the journey (the story) of thought and philosophy and the word made flesh.
My favorite chapters were Unhallowed Arts (Mary Shelley) and The Songs of Spring (Keats). Most of the points he brings to life about literature completely opened my mind and put Romanticism in a new perspective for me while still building on what I already loved about it.
Frankenstein is my favorite book (if a reader can even have just one) and I had an understanding that it was deeply rooted in Paradise Lost and the authors mothers feminist views, and that there was a definite emphasis on women. But in Unhallowed Arts he revealed so much more to me, it was like all the dots I saw on the page were finally connected more cohesively than ever before, like I was falling in love with the book all over again.
Let me also add (perhaps this is the most important part) that you do not need any previous knowledge of anything to read this book, with maybe the exception of literacy. He doesn’t bore those who already love the Romantic movement well with dumbed-down recaps but doesn’t talk so lofty that those who have the brains of a baby Idaho potato couldn’t fully understand and love it too. Edit: I take it back, an Idaho potato could not understand this book, I read some of the negative reviews and there are clearly some Idaho Potatoes in this world.
One last point: how would one put this book in any one genre? It does not rabbit trail yet seems about everything all at once. I think that speaks volumes to this: Truth and Beauty really is everything and in everything.
Shame on you. by the time you finished reading this review you could’ve been half-way through the book by now.
Andrew Klaven is a man who understands and clearly communicates why Western Civilization matters, it’s not about Geography, it’s about everything that is good and holy in this world, the tradition that is based on the Bible and what Jesus Christ did for us on the cross.
Klaven is honest and comical in a way that is relatable and disarming, the book is brilliant and deep without compromising it’s accessibility and without feeling pedantic, and he has done what few non-fiction writers have achieved: his work is a story. It takes you on the journey (the story) of thought and philosophy and the word made flesh.
My favorite chapters were Unhallowed Arts (Mary Shelley) and The Songs of Spring (Keats). Most of the points he brings to life about literature completely opened my mind and put Romanticism in a new perspective for me while still building on what I already loved about it.
Frankenstein is my favorite book (if a reader can even have just one) and I had an understanding that it was deeply rooted in Paradise Lost and the authors mothers feminist views, and that there was a definite emphasis on women. But in Unhallowed Arts he revealed so much more to me, it was like all the dots I saw on the page were finally connected more cohesively than ever before, like I was falling in love with the book all over again.
Let me also add (perhaps this is the most important part) that you do not need any previous knowledge of anything to read this book, with maybe the exception of literacy. He doesn’t bore those who already love the Romantic movement well with dumbed-down recaps but doesn’t talk so lofty that those who have the brains of a baby Idaho potato couldn’t fully understand and love it too. Edit: I take it back, an Idaho potato could not understand this book, I read some of the negative reviews and there are clearly some Idaho Potatoes in this world.
One last point: how would one put this book in any one genre? It does not rabbit trail yet seems about everything all at once. I think that speaks volumes to this: Truth and Beauty really is everything and in everything.
Shame on you. by the time you finished reading this review you could’ve been half-way through the book by now.
April 20, 2022
This book is truly beautiful. The nexus of history, biography, poetry, politics, theology, and memoir, provide a deeply compelling narrative that is sure to add to your "want to read" list. The transcendental exploration will leave you seeing God, nature, and yourself differently. For me they are all more real and more symbolic than they were before. I can't recommend this enough. So I must say, thank you Mr. Klavan for the truth and beauty you've shown me.
April 16, 2022
I give out quite a few 5 star reviews, I tend to read the sort of books that I like and when I like a book I give it a high rating, but after reading this I feel like I should go and lower the reviews of many of the other books I've rated because this is in a league of its own.
Andrew Klavan's understanding of the Gospels is quite amazing, he was a reluctant convert in his 40s and not baptized until he was 49, he had to explore a lot of wrong paths before he stumbled down the right path.
In this, his second book on faith he relates the romantic poets, and what they were grappling with to what we are grappling with today and how both show the truth of the Gospels and the words of Jesus.
Andrew Klavan's understanding of the Gospels is quite amazing, he was a reluctant convert in his 40s and not baptized until he was 49, he had to explore a lot of wrong paths before he stumbled down the right path.
In this, his second book on faith he relates the romantic poets, and what they were grappling with to what we are grappling with today and how both show the truth of the Gospels and the words of Jesus.
June 23, 2022
Beauty descends from God into nature, but there it would perish and does except when a Man appreciates it with worship and thus as it were sends it back to God: so that through his consciousness what descended ascends again and the perfect circle is made." — C.S. Lewis, letter to Arthur GreavesThis entire book is Andrew Klavan discovering what Lewis describes above and then fleshing it out using examples from poetry and other written art. Along the way we get the lives of some of the poets and then Klavan's own deeper dive into the Gospels.
I picked this up from the library on the strength of the enthusiastic comments from The Literary Life podcast folks who were working their way through it. I agreed with them as I read the first half and don't think they'd gotten to Klavan's commentary on the Gospels yet which I occasionally found problematic. I myself sometimes found Klavan's Gospel interpretations to be uncomfortably far afield from my own understanding. I haven't gone to the trouble of learning Greek, as Klavan did, but I have read a wide number of commentaries from people who knew the Greek themselves. That is a fairly small quibble though.
This is a book that opens your eyes to the power of art, nature, and our own imaginations in finding and furthering our personal friendship with Christ. That's the part that spoke to me. I read it in two days and it definitely is a book I'll reread.
December 26, 2022
The subtitle is exceedingly misleading. If it read “The Truth and Beauty: How the Lives and Works of England’s Greatest Poets Point the Way to a Deeper Understanding of Andrew Klavan’s Political Beliefs” I still would have picked the book up and probably would have enjoyed it more.
The information about the lives and works of the Romantic Poets was interesting, but entirely unrelated from the “deeper understanding of the words of Jesus” that he tries to pull together in the last chapter.
The one thing I wholeheartedly agree with Klavan about is a quote from page 6 of this book: “I’m not a theologian. I’m not a pastor. You mustn’t trust your salvation to me. It’ll just get you into trouble.”
The information about the lives and works of the Romantic Poets was interesting, but entirely unrelated from the “deeper understanding of the words of Jesus” that he tries to pull together in the last chapter.
The one thing I wholeheartedly agree with Klavan about is a quote from page 6 of this book: “I’m not a theologian. I’m not a pastor. You mustn’t trust your salvation to me. It’ll just get you into trouble.”
August 7, 2023
"Maybe your problem is that you're trying to understand Jesus as a philosophy instead of as he truly is: a person."
Klavan says that these are "the wisest words anyone has ever said" to him.
What does that have to do with England's greatest poets (and human sexuality and modern science fiction and even the Sermon on the Mount)? Everything, Klavan thinks. The thesis/subtitle is striking and the book only gets better from there. There was less here of their poetry than I expected and more of their biographies/historical context -- which helps me understand their poetry better.
I think I need to read more of England's greatest poets. And I think I want to read more from Andrew Klavan.
Klavan says that these are "the wisest words anyone has ever said" to him.
What does that have to do with England's greatest poets (and human sexuality and modern science fiction and even the Sermon on the Mount)? Everything, Klavan thinks. The thesis/subtitle is striking and the book only gets better from there. There was less here of their poetry than I expected and more of their biographies/historical context -- which helps me understand their poetry better.
I think I need to read more of England's greatest poets. And I think I want to read more from Andrew Klavan.
August 15, 2022
I'm glad I read his memoir first, since that helps so much of this book make sense. It's kind of hard to label this book. There are parts that are history, part literary analyis, part worldview discussion...
So, I'm not sure where I'd shelve it, but I did thoroughly enjoy reading it and found it thought provoking and interesting.
So, I'm not sure where I'd shelve it, but I did thoroughly enjoy reading it and found it thought provoking and interesting.
August 31, 2023
Giving it five stars doesn't necessarily mean that I agree with everything, and I'm not claiming to understand everything that he's talking about either, but this book made me look at the world in an entirely new way. I'm struggling to express myself about it. I tried to write a poem that was inspired by his ideas but it met a rapid and untimely death, even after emergency surgery. It is currently on life support.
Here are a few quotes from the book:
"The purpose of poetry, Barfield says, is to reunite the language of the physical with the language of the spiritual in our minds, and so recreate the original human experience of the physical and the spiritual as one thing."
"In some sense, all language is metaphor. The word love is not love itself; it's a small term we used to describe the vast experience. And since, as Hamlet teaches us, our lives are the language of the meaning of our lives, so our lives are a metaphor"
"At this point, I think it is actually more plausible to believe that matter is the spoken word of the One Great Mind than that it is simply itself. Mathematics would not work if this were not so--it would have no underlying idea to which to refer. Truth, morality, and beauty. Likewise- they would be smoke and illusion as the materialists say they are. But they're not. Math, truth, morality, and beauty are all ways in which our minds translate matter into meaning-- the Logos--the meaning and the consciousness of the great mind"
"Such a person, the embodied Word, would be the clear mirror which shows us the image of moral reality we now see only darkly. He would be the silent presence of the truth the language of our lives can only roughly express and he would be inexpressible except as a presence, as story, as a living metaphor for himself."
"Matter is the language of the Logos. Our lives are meant to express the truth and beauty which is woven into the fabric of God's creation. But like all languages, matter is a rude tool that cannot wholly express, but can only hint at, the silent fullness of reality. There are always gaps between the truth of things and our expression of the truth."
Here are a few quotes from the book:
"The purpose of poetry, Barfield says, is to reunite the language of the physical with the language of the spiritual in our minds, and so recreate the original human experience of the physical and the spiritual as one thing."
"In some sense, all language is metaphor. The word love is not love itself; it's a small term we used to describe the vast experience. And since, as Hamlet teaches us, our lives are the language of the meaning of our lives, so our lives are a metaphor"
"At this point, I think it is actually more plausible to believe that matter is the spoken word of the One Great Mind than that it is simply itself. Mathematics would not work if this were not so--it would have no underlying idea to which to refer. Truth, morality, and beauty. Likewise- they would be smoke and illusion as the materialists say they are. But they're not. Math, truth, morality, and beauty are all ways in which our minds translate matter into meaning-- the Logos--the meaning and the consciousness of the great mind"
"Such a person, the embodied Word, would be the clear mirror which shows us the image of moral reality we now see only darkly. He would be the silent presence of the truth the language of our lives can only roughly express and he would be inexpressible except as a presence, as story, as a living metaphor for himself."
"Matter is the language of the Logos. Our lives are meant to express the truth and beauty which is woven into the fabric of God's creation. But like all languages, matter is a rude tool that cannot wholly express, but can only hint at, the silent fullness of reality. There are always gaps between the truth of things and our expression of the truth."
February 17, 2025
Baptize the stories.
That’s the sentiment I get reading this book. Everything good and true has a way of directing us to Christ and it is no less true than with the three Romantic poets plus Mary Shelly Klavan highlights. The book is very witty, and I value it mostly for the first and second parts of three where Klavan describes in the familiar detail only an ardent admirer may have the lives and works of Coleridge, Keats, and Wordsworth. If you’ve listened to his show as long as I have, then you will doubtlessly recognize some of points Klavan makes. However, I value the story told about the tragic lives of these three, how they were shaped both by art and by the crazy lives lived. Reading that in the context of discovering Christ in an age famous for moving away from such “superstition” is valuable. Definitely would recommend as now I need to acquire some poetry collections.
That’s the sentiment I get reading this book. Everything good and true has a way of directing us to Christ and it is no less true than with the three Romantic poets plus Mary Shelly Klavan highlights. The book is very witty, and I value it mostly for the first and second parts of three where Klavan describes in the familiar detail only an ardent admirer may have the lives and works of Coleridge, Keats, and Wordsworth. If you’ve listened to his show as long as I have, then you will doubtlessly recognize some of points Klavan makes. However, I value the story told about the tragic lives of these three, how they were shaped both by art and by the crazy lives lived. Reading that in the context of discovering Christ in an age famous for moving away from such “superstition” is valuable. Definitely would recommend as now I need to acquire some poetry collections.
August 3, 2025
This book doesn't easily fit a genre. It has a lot of thoughts in it. They are organised. A few bits got abstract and made my eyes glaze over (esp in the last main section of the book, which was more theory). But then, so does Percy Shelley, one of the Romantic poets starring in the narrative sections (which made parts 1 and 2 of the book go down easy). Many more bits than that got underlined. Read this book if you want a highly intelligent autodidact Christian who's read voraciously opine, probably more sensibly than you, about the meaning of the universe.
October 22, 2022
There were some interesting parts and things to ponder, but I don't feel like it actually lived up to the premise. I also wonder if I would have appreciated it more as an audiobook narrated by the author. He has a unique writing style, and I loved his memoir, The Great Good Thing. But the same writing style just didn't quite work for me in this book, at least not in print.
July 19, 2022
This was rough. I almost wanted to give it two stars because I like the dreamy way he describes some of the romantic poets lives at the beginning of the book. But it is so, so bad. Klavan seems like a stubborn, angry, narrow-minded, judgmental old man to me, who used this avenue to speak his mind. This book is dripping with condescension, griping, biting sarcasm, and disdain for those who do not see things the way exactly like Klavan does. There is no talk of truth or beauty, just of "the way things are because that's why." I thought it was a nice challenge to read it all the way through, even though on multiple occasions I was seething with anger for the narrow-mindedness and mean-spiritedness the author exhibits.
There are some things in the end of the book I would have liked in my days of closer adherence to an orthodox kind of faith, but they are packaged among so much judgment and fear of change/progress that they become less impactful to read.
I recommend not reading this book and spending your time doing more edifying things with your life.
There are some things in the end of the book I would have liked in my days of closer adherence to an orthodox kind of faith, but they are packaged among so much judgment and fear of change/progress that they become less impactful to read.
I recommend not reading this book and spending your time doing more edifying things with your life.
April 17, 2022
i wish i could rate this higher. i have about seven people i recommended it to and now i’m just starstruck and in love.
June 28, 2025
This was a re-read. It's delightful as an audiobook, but I needed to read the physical copy. Klavan's ideas and meditations on the nature of matter, reality, truth, and the Logos struck me the first time as profound but beyond my grasp—possibly just barely-sane sophistry (Coleridge himself was not altogether mentally normal, after all).
They stuck with me though, niggling at the back of my mind, when I read Coleridge's biography by Guite. Finally, they began to make just a little bit of sense when I re-read this book while digesting Michael Jones's apologetics work on quantum theory as an argument for God. Klavan actually briefly mentions quantum theory and its implications in the last section of this book. It seems Wordsworth and the Romantics were onto something in their fight against naturalism and the materialistic assumptions of their "age of reason." I doubt they would've dreamed that the physics and mathematics to which they drank "confusion" at their famous toast would eventually lead back to the eternal Word and the very meaning that they were trying to get hold of.
I've never been more wonderstruck at science (in spite of my paltry understanding of its disciplines) or grateful for poetry—especially the Christian mystics and the Romantics.
They stuck with me though, niggling at the back of my mind, when I read Coleridge's biography by Guite. Finally, they began to make just a little bit of sense when I re-read this book while digesting Michael Jones's apologetics work on quantum theory as an argument for God. Klavan actually briefly mentions quantum theory and its implications in the last section of this book. It seems Wordsworth and the Romantics were onto something in their fight against naturalism and the materialistic assumptions of their "age of reason." I doubt they would've dreamed that the physics and mathematics to which they drank "confusion" at their famous toast would eventually lead back to the eternal Word and the very meaning that they were trying to get hold of.
I've never been more wonderstruck at science (in spite of my paltry understanding of its disciplines) or grateful for poetry—especially the Christian mystics and the Romantics.
July 26, 2025
I really enjoyed this book, not least because it made me feel like an English major again. It was nice to delve in the lives and works of Wordsworth and Shelley and Keats. It brought me back to those classes, the thoughts I used to have about these poems, to wandering the Lake District, to being in the room where Keats died in Italy, all in the best ways. It was nice to reflect on them in a new way.
I wouldn't mind rereading it again when my mental faculties are better than they are now in this life state, but maybe that day will never come! Though on that note, my favorite chapter was probably his chapter on Mary Shelley and Frankenstein and the role of the feminine. "The unique power of the feminine, then, is not just to confer life on matter but to infuse life with creative humanity. Even God, when he wanted to become human, chose for himself a mother."
I wouldn't mind rereading it again when my mental faculties are better than they are now in this life state, but maybe that day will never come! Though on that note, my favorite chapter was probably his chapter on Mary Shelley and Frankenstein and the role of the feminine. "The unique power of the feminine, then, is not just to confer life on matter but to infuse life with creative humanity. Even God, when he wanted to become human, chose for himself a mother."
December 13, 2022
This was a really interesting collection of non-fiction essays. I think I was expecting a little more of a textbook argument or comparison style set of essays, and this wasn't really that. It was more of an exploration of ideas about different authors and their ideals crossing over with those of Jesus throughout the Bible and the ideals He taught. This book reads like sitting in someone's living room talking over heavy concepts with a pot of tea. Definitely not for everyone, but interesting to think about or think back on even when the conversation has ended.
August 3, 2022
TLDR: a decent resource for information and various insights about romantic poetry, but outlandish and terribly written as a critical work. I would strongly advise that if you are interested in this book for its advertised premise, do not read it.
I never write reviews, however I cannot in good conscience see that this book has 4.4 stars on here and not say anything.
First, know that is genuinely saddens me to be writing this. The subtitle of this book, “How the Lives and Works of England’s Greatest Poets Point the Way to a Deeper Understanding of the Words of Jesus,” is what piqued my interest. I am intensely passionate about the place of art in faith, and Klavan did indeed have many important things to say about this subject. However, they were so poorly expressed, so poorly reasoned, so dilapidated in presentation that he could hardly be said to have done the subject justice.
A large portion of this book is a good resource for people without the most exposure to romantic poetry, which I assume is Klavan’s usual audience. This is one of its redeeming qualities. He does a good job of explaining the context of the great poets, highlighting key ideas and events of the time that had a direct impact on their lives; I did actually learn a few really great things!
But beyond this, the book is a pain to read; it took me two months if not more to get through because of how convoluted it was. It’s heartbreaking to say because you can tell from the depth of Klavan’s knowledge that he really did spend years studying and consuming romantic literature, but this was done without a proper training in critical thinking or analysis.
The primary issue is a lack of analytical skill, that he draws conclusions and connections from poems that no educated person would be permitted to draw. My personal favorite is that the industrial revolution is sexist because women are divine spirits of femininity and that is actually the moral of Frankenstein. Or another: Owen Barfield’s analysis of language and how ancient language often unified spirit and matter is somehow related to the moral of Macbeth. Even more ridiculous: that official scientists are the ones theorizing that the world is a simulation (rather than nut-jobs from their parents’ basement) because they are unwilling to accept immaterial truth and the role of consciousness in the world. And the dumb-fuckiest of all: Ephesians 5 is actually saying that the man should be the bread-winner and the wife should be the homemaker, that this unification in marriage is the image of divine Logos in us, and it is somehow exemplified in the relationship between Mary (Jesus’s mother) and Jesus. You lost yet? Yeah. He makes these lofty arguments using intelligent sounding words in tandem with intelligent sounding information, which all really just reeks of pretentiousness and to me reveals that he is way out of his depth.
Beyond this, the issue comes down to critical thinking skills, or at the very least the lack of logical expression. In over 2/3 of the book, Klavan’s rabbit trails and strange connections are usually not at all beneficial to what he claims to be his driving point. He will sometimes even bring in completely irrelevant hot button topics that do nothing but stir the pot. What his goal is here I cannot say. Further, he often jumps from one point to the next with unmitigated speed so that one point rarely feels like it follows from his previous, not giving his readers enough space to process his points and see how they relate to each other. Sometimes—and this is the kicker—the whiplash is due to legitimate logical fallacy, equivocation, and even self-contradiction. It reads like a man’s wandering musings rather than a structured, developed exegesis.
It breaks my heart that this is the case. What Klavan is grasping at is so valuable. So many of his ideas are crucial to how I understand God and the world around me. But instead he just makes himself sound ridiculous—like he’s sexist, racist, and a little stupid, ignorant of really anything beyond the few books he’s read, like he has more to say about the world than about Jesus, like he’s never written an essay in his life, never taken a logic class, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. And I am trying to be charitable but I am obviously fed up about it.
This is a decent jumping off point for people who have never been exposed to romantic poetry, but if you are genuinely looking for that exposure, please, for crying out loud, look somewhere else. Watch a video essay on YouTube, take a class, read something by an actual scholar, do not waste your time with this.
I never write reviews, however I cannot in good conscience see that this book has 4.4 stars on here and not say anything.
First, know that is genuinely saddens me to be writing this. The subtitle of this book, “How the Lives and Works of England’s Greatest Poets Point the Way to a Deeper Understanding of the Words of Jesus,” is what piqued my interest. I am intensely passionate about the place of art in faith, and Klavan did indeed have many important things to say about this subject. However, they were so poorly expressed, so poorly reasoned, so dilapidated in presentation that he could hardly be said to have done the subject justice.
A large portion of this book is a good resource for people without the most exposure to romantic poetry, which I assume is Klavan’s usual audience. This is one of its redeeming qualities. He does a good job of explaining the context of the great poets, highlighting key ideas and events of the time that had a direct impact on their lives; I did actually learn a few really great things!
But beyond this, the book is a pain to read; it took me two months if not more to get through because of how convoluted it was. It’s heartbreaking to say because you can tell from the depth of Klavan’s knowledge that he really did spend years studying and consuming romantic literature, but this was done without a proper training in critical thinking or analysis.
The primary issue is a lack of analytical skill, that he draws conclusions and connections from poems that no educated person would be permitted to draw. My personal favorite is that the industrial revolution is sexist because women are divine spirits of femininity and that is actually the moral of Frankenstein. Or another: Owen Barfield’s analysis of language and how ancient language often unified spirit and matter is somehow related to the moral of Macbeth. Even more ridiculous: that official scientists are the ones theorizing that the world is a simulation (rather than nut-jobs from their parents’ basement) because they are unwilling to accept immaterial truth and the role of consciousness in the world. And the dumb-fuckiest of all: Ephesians 5 is actually saying that the man should be the bread-winner and the wife should be the homemaker, that this unification in marriage is the image of divine Logos in us, and it is somehow exemplified in the relationship between Mary (Jesus’s mother) and Jesus. You lost yet? Yeah. He makes these lofty arguments using intelligent sounding words in tandem with intelligent sounding information, which all really just reeks of pretentiousness and to me reveals that he is way out of his depth.
Beyond this, the issue comes down to critical thinking skills, or at the very least the lack of logical expression. In over 2/3 of the book, Klavan’s rabbit trails and strange connections are usually not at all beneficial to what he claims to be his driving point. He will sometimes even bring in completely irrelevant hot button topics that do nothing but stir the pot. What his goal is here I cannot say. Further, he often jumps from one point to the next with unmitigated speed so that one point rarely feels like it follows from his previous, not giving his readers enough space to process his points and see how they relate to each other. Sometimes—and this is the kicker—the whiplash is due to legitimate logical fallacy, equivocation, and even self-contradiction. It reads like a man’s wandering musings rather than a structured, developed exegesis.
It breaks my heart that this is the case. What Klavan is grasping at is so valuable. So many of his ideas are crucial to how I understand God and the world around me. But instead he just makes himself sound ridiculous—like he’s sexist, racist, and a little stupid, ignorant of really anything beyond the few books he’s read, like he has more to say about the world than about Jesus, like he’s never written an essay in his life, never taken a logic class, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. And I am trying to be charitable but I am obviously fed up about it.
This is a decent jumping off point for people who have never been exposed to romantic poetry, but if you are genuinely looking for that exposure, please, for crying out loud, look somewhere else. Watch a video essay on YouTube, take a class, read something by an actual scholar, do not waste your time with this.
August 11, 2024
Truth bombs all throughout make this a really great deep read, and the historical context is fascinating. Setting up the Romantic period against the Industrialization of the West was such a fixating concept, he builds a great case for that as backlash against de-humanizing all industry, especially the work of women. Way to go!
May 4, 2022
This book was not what I expected. The title made it seem like it would be an examination of English literature and poetry through the lens of religion. This is not that book.
I hated the first 2/3 which seemed just a random history of various English poets. Some or their works were discussed, like Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, but other then that I had no interest.
The final 1/3 is about the gospels. This was a bit more interesting, but at this point too little too late. This almost felt like 2 separate books that were jammed together.
Maybe I missed something. But did not enjoy. Although I did finish, hence the 2 stars.
I hated the first 2/3 which seemed just a random history of various English poets. Some or their works were discussed, like Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, but other then that I had no interest.
The final 1/3 is about the gospels. This was a bit more interesting, but at this point too little too late. This almost felt like 2 separate books that were jammed together.
Maybe I missed something. But did not enjoy. Although I did finish, hence the 2 stars.
August 19, 2022
Klavan beautifully pieces threads of the romantics to the mystery of the gospels, painting of picture of reality that is both enchanting and convincing. I find myself turning over familiar passages and theological truths with his incarnational lens and discovering myself more worshipful and more equipped to understand God.
Definitely a book i'll be coming back to. And a practice i'll be trying to emulate.
A pithy phrasing i came up with during my note taking :)
"Radicalism would wipe all culture and tradition, and build anew. But naked men make for poor tailors.
Jesus, meanwhile, makes all things new, stitching our broken garments and enflaming sackcloth ashes."
Definitely a book i'll be coming back to. And a practice i'll be trying to emulate.
A pithy phrasing i came up with during my note taking :)
"Radicalism would wipe all culture and tradition, and build anew. But naked men make for poor tailors.
Jesus, meanwhile, makes all things new, stitching our broken garments and enflaming sackcloth ashes."
May 9, 2022
Really interesting viewpoint of Christianity and Jesus through the eyes of literature and poetry. I don't really like poetry but I now am very interested in reading the poets highlighted in this book.
Klavan has me looking at the life of Jesus in a different way. But this sideways look at Jesus's life is not one that dismisses the way I looked at Jesus before but rather enriches and clarifies it.
I will have to sit and think about this one and will need to reread again soon.
Klavan has me looking at the life of Jesus in a different way. But this sideways look at Jesus's life is not one that dismisses the way I looked at Jesus before but rather enriches and clarifies it.
I will have to sit and think about this one and will need to reread again soon.
April 29, 2024
Really very close to being 5-star. A bedazzling look at the heart of the Romantic poets, what they saw and were expressing about meaning beyond matter. And then how that way of seeing helped the author better understand Jesus and the world and our own stories.
I was hooked from the introduction, where the author vibrantly describes a bit of his spiritual journey. Definitely want to find his memoir about that. Anyway. Then I realized he’s a political commentator and I read the rest of the book with deep suspicion—for all politics make me uneasy and sometimes much perturbed. His politics do color the way he talks about a few things, but they are not the point of the book, and so, even though I didn’t always like it, I was not perturbed overmuch by it after all.
The greater part of the book explores the lives and vicissitudes of Lord Byron, the Shelleys, Coleridge, Wordsworth, and Keats. And now I want to read them all.
The last section explores Jesus himself…The Jesus who walked this earth—who he was and the meaning of him. So, so good. So thought-stimulating! I wish I could read this section with a group of thinking friends to discuss and argue and wonder about and question the ideas presented. It would be 🔥.
A worthwhile read to sit with for awhile. Agreeing, pushing back on a few opinions, considering the so-what…
I was hooked from the introduction, where the author vibrantly describes a bit of his spiritual journey. Definitely want to find his memoir about that. Anyway. Then I realized he’s a political commentator and I read the rest of the book with deep suspicion—for all politics make me uneasy and sometimes much perturbed. His politics do color the way he talks about a few things, but they are not the point of the book, and so, even though I didn’t always like it, I was not perturbed overmuch by it after all.
The greater part of the book explores the lives and vicissitudes of Lord Byron, the Shelleys, Coleridge, Wordsworth, and Keats. And now I want to read them all.
The last section explores Jesus himself…The Jesus who walked this earth—who he was and the meaning of him. So, so good. So thought-stimulating! I wish I could read this section with a group of thinking friends to discuss and argue and wonder about and question the ideas presented. It would be 🔥.
A worthwhile read to sit with for awhile. Agreeing, pushing back on a few opinions, considering the so-what…
Displaying 1 - 30 of 284 reviews