What do you think?
Rate this book
The American Way: Family and Community in the Shaping of the American Identity
The traditional family was central to the American story. Only recently has it fallen into neglect. The American Way is the narrative of how this happened.
Many history books emphasize American individualism and enterprise, but in The American Way, Allan C. Carlson shows that Americans saw the family as central to their national identity.
Not only did the traditional family shape public policy in the twentieth century, but the American family moved us towards the “melting pot” vision of America. Whether it’s Theodore Roosevelt, the campaign for a family wage, or Life magazine’s ideal of the family, we see that the family has been the heart of the American dream, and it is only in recent decades that we have abandoned it.
Many history books emphasize American individualism and enterprise, but in The American Way, Allan C. Carlson shows that Americans saw the family as central to their national identity.
Not only did the traditional family shape public policy in the twentieth century, but the American family moved us towards the “melting pot” vision of America. Whether it’s Theodore Roosevelt, the campaign for a family wage, or Life magazine’s ideal of the family, we see that the family has been the heart of the American dream, and it is only in recent decades that we have abandoned it.
330 pages, Paperback
First published November 1, 2003
95 people are currently reading
358 people want to read
About the author
Allan C. Carlson
28 books31 followersAllan C. Carlson (born Des Moines, Iowa, 1949) is a scholar and professor of history at Hillsdale College in Hillsdale, Michigan. He is the president of the Howard Center for Family, Religion and Society, a director of the Family in America Studies Center, the International Secretary of the World Congress of Families and editor of the Family in America newsletter. He is also former president of the Rockford Institute.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 27 of 27 reviews
August 9, 2023
This book was different than my usual reading material. To be completely honest after the first few chapters I only skimmed the rest. It was interesting to see that America really did try to uphold family values and reject feminism through various policies over the years, but depravity won out and now we are where we are. Main take away? Having 10 kids is the biggest form of cultural rebellion. Be a producer and not a consumer. Revive the household economy. Feminism was and continues to be a discontentment campaign. Get content with God and give thanks for your portion and place. Have babies and stay home with them. Rely on the Lord for your daily bread and not the government. Live fruitfully and faithfully.
August 21, 2023
Historically enlightening after the fashion of George Grant or Paul Johnson. I find it very interesting that the origins of the welfare state were built around a pro-natalist ethos dedicated to the preservation of the intact family unit. Carlson’s tracing of the history here makes the book not only a fascinating historical resource, but also a piercing conservative tragedy. The road to hell truly is paved with good intentions.
Read
April 28, 2022Canon Press also just re-published this book. Again, thanks to the folks at Intercollegiate Studies Institute for doing such a good job editing it. Carlson is a real gem who I dreamed about getting to publish and hear talk on Canon Calls. He's also an inspiration for C.R. Wiley, Steven Wedgeworth, and more recently Rory Groves.
This book is perhaps less flashy than Third Ways, but it's also a bit more useful than a lot of other histories of the twentieth century. A lot of Christians look at the twentieth century and point a lot of fingers at the sexual revolution of the sixties as the "fall moment," or perhaps even the fifties. But I think it's important to balance ideological causes with material causes, and certainly though the me-generation can be faulted for a lot, this book points out how our nation had policies that were crafted to strengthen the family in the face of industrialism.
The book is very focused: it begins with Theodore Roosevelt and ends with Ronald Reagan. In between we have the stories of how the family was a basic unifier for the American Way, and how it was central to the vision of the nation until the sixties and seventies. One of the most chilling moments is when all the sociologists working for the Federal Government under LBJ basically said the natural family doesn't matter at all and it can be anything. That quick, huh! Turns out Lewis was right that sociology is just a pseudo-science, meant for political stuff. It's shocking to think how so many ordinary lives have been wrecked by this change in vision, aided by public policy.
Carlson describes the maternalist movement in great detail, showing how it integrated German Americans into this nation and how it helped create a lot of the new deal programs that our nation is still based on. And he shows how empty, by comparison, Ronald Reagan's presidency was in terms of strengthening the family. Reagan talked a lot about the recovery of religion and the family, but once you lose the definition of the natural family, you're in the dark already. (Interestingly, this problem afflicted Daniel Patrick Moynihan, too.)
There's some real surprises in this book that I won't spoil, but it's a great gem about how Americans used to think about the family and why they don't think like that anymore.
This book is perhaps less flashy than Third Ways, but it's also a bit more useful than a lot of other histories of the twentieth century. A lot of Christians look at the twentieth century and point a lot of fingers at the sexual revolution of the sixties as the "fall moment," or perhaps even the fifties. But I think it's important to balance ideological causes with material causes, and certainly though the me-generation can be faulted for a lot, this book points out how our nation had policies that were crafted to strengthen the family in the face of industrialism.
The book is very focused: it begins with Theodore Roosevelt and ends with Ronald Reagan. In between we have the stories of how the family was a basic unifier for the American Way, and how it was central to the vision of the nation until the sixties and seventies. One of the most chilling moments is when all the sociologists working for the Federal Government under LBJ basically said the natural family doesn't matter at all and it can be anything. That quick, huh! Turns out Lewis was right that sociology is just a pseudo-science, meant for political stuff. It's shocking to think how so many ordinary lives have been wrecked by this change in vision, aided by public policy.
Carlson describes the maternalist movement in great detail, showing how it integrated German Americans into this nation and how it helped create a lot of the new deal programs that our nation is still based on. And he shows how empty, by comparison, Ronald Reagan's presidency was in terms of strengthening the family. Reagan talked a lot about the recovery of religion and the family, but once you lose the definition of the natural family, you're in the dark already. (Interestingly, this problem afflicted Daniel Patrick Moynihan, too.)
There's some real surprises in this book that I won't spoil, but it's a great gem about how Americans used to think about the family and why they don't think like that anymore.
November 11, 2025
The first two chapters were just fascinating. The remainder of the book was decent. A really fascinating take on the New Deal.
July 3, 2023
What I expected to be a much more argumentative, prescriptive book was actually a very specialized, thorough history of family policy in American politics. It is an excellent book in that regard. Carlson does make a case for a return to many of the policies he documented in the book in his closing arguments, and said case was far milder and nuanced than I expected. All that being said, Carlson has a few blind spots, and even though he hangs a lantern on a few of them, his self-awareness of these issues unfortunately doesn't lead him to the well-deserved condemnation of them that he should have offered.
The American Way is a book documenting the well-meaning policies that were largely instrumental in destroying the very thing they sought to uphold. May we learn the right lesson, and not repeat the same errors in an attempt to arrive at a different conclusion.
The American Way is a book documenting the well-meaning policies that were largely instrumental in destroying the very thing they sought to uphold. May we learn the right lesson, and not repeat the same errors in an attempt to arrive at a different conclusion.
July 28, 2023
Allan Carlsons' book is not what I expected. It was a thorough and precise historical analysis of the formation of Americanism from Teddy Roosevelt to Ronald Reagan. He tracks the maternalist movement from German immigrants to the equity feminists in the 70s - 90s. He reveals how different government administration's came into the office with good intentions of helping the nuclear family and how they predictably failed. In Reagan's case, he wasn't willing to outright support traditional gender roles in his policy. One must first ask, "What is the family?" and "How is it to be structured in accordance with scripture" before the nuclear family can be turned into the nuclear reactor that it should be. Atomistic libertarian individualism is not the enemy of nor a threat to the ever growing state. The threat to and the safeguard against the Leviathan is instead multiple atoms joined together into a cohesive molecular bond called the family. That natural, fundamental, and unified institution is the greatest force and asset in the Americans arsenal against the secular suicide of the West. When America is saved, it will be through faithful men and women building large families, raising those children in the fear and admonition of the Lord, and staying linked together through multiple generations.
December 3, 2023
If you are looking for a history of the family, specifically from the context of early American life, this is a good spot to begin. The life and appreciation of families, what makes a good family a good family, family engagement and importance, and why families are (or were) the foundation for the American way are all found in this book. Conversely, to see how far we have fallen in understanding and seeking for the furtherance of the family unit in our culture today is stark. This book is more history than theology proper, but I only say that for category reasons - not because it is a negative aspect.
Read
May 24, 2025Mmm, maybe not the best one to read so late in pregnancy. Over here sobbing about the loss of the American family and the American dream, haha.
Here’s to rebuilding one healthy family at a time. Let’s do this.
An impressive work. It’s sort of impossible, but I do love when people try to grapple with what is the American Way and build that on a lot of history and everyday family life.
Here’s to rebuilding one healthy family at a time. Let’s do this.
An impressive work. It’s sort of impossible, but I do love when people try to grapple with what is the American Way and build that on a lot of history and everyday family life.
November 11, 2023
A fantastic clear and concise history of the American family, the factors which influenced it, and why it has devolved.
December 15, 2024
A great overview for those asking the question “What happened to America?”
March 8, 2018
Interesting history on the role that the family played in creating a stable “American” identity in the 20th century, and its impact on domestic and foreign policy. Interesting sections include Carlson showing the role that family-centered German immigrants had in creating this identity. He then looks at how the programs of FDR’s New Deal were based on the centrality and the importance of what the natural family.
This all unravels in the 60’s when American identity was sought in anti-communism, racial identities, or more opaque notions of freedom and progress. Interesting note here is his discussion of how southern “Dixiecrats” and equity feminist congressmen worked together during the Civil Rights Act to undercut the Act’s primary intent to curb racial discrimination, as well as undercut the practice of family wage.
Reagan attempted to relocate the centrality of the family, but it was vague and mingled with (and weakened by) pro-capitalist ideology. He ends by arguing for the continued importance to locate tAmerica’s unique identity in the family.
Lastly, Teddy Roosevelt had no chill.
This all unravels in the 60’s when American identity was sought in anti-communism, racial identities, or more opaque notions of freedom and progress. Interesting note here is his discussion of how southern “Dixiecrats” and equity feminist congressmen worked together during the Civil Rights Act to undercut the Act’s primary intent to curb racial discrimination, as well as undercut the practice of family wage.
Reagan attempted to relocate the centrality of the family, but it was vague and mingled with (and weakened by) pro-capitalist ideology. He ends by arguing for the continued importance to locate tAmerica’s unique identity in the family.
Lastly, Teddy Roosevelt had no chill.
July 6, 2025
This is a good read for our time, as family policy rises in political prominence. Carlson argues that "'family' and 'religiously-grounded community' . . . served in the twentieth century as the dominant imagery for American self-understanding." (xi) To him, “the powerful images surrounding the family and related natural communities seem properly American,” and he shows how family defined American life and vice-versa throughout history. (258) People on the left might look at Carlson’s background and shudder, but this sensible history generally avoids polemics. Carlson is at his best when he digs up surprising historical facts and dives into movements that today seem incongruous with the two parties in power.
He begins with the early 1900s, convincingly arguing that Theodore Roosevelt sought to build a new American identity based on family and not, like some historians posit, on racial lines. (3) Carlson argues that Teddy's mention of "race" was more expansive, covering Americans as an ethnicity. Roosevelt tied American nationalism to birthrates and advocated policies like differential taxation for child-rearing families. Today, JD Vance and others on the new right pursue the same narrative and some of the same policies.
Carlson moves on to describe how German-American family values permeated the broader culture and melded with the rising trend of Settlement Houses. Together, they forged an integrationist American culture that rejected old xenophobia and united around support for strong family units. (27) This movement, largely led by women, birthed (pun intended) numerous programs to help expecting mothers and babies. America's self-understanding became more communitarian, which further precipitated legislation like the Sheppard-Tower act. Interestingly, the American Medical Association teamed up with corporate interests and equity feminists to oppose legislation to help mother and babies. (81)
The New Deal built on this pro-family culture to enact policy supporting families. Carlson points out in this section that the New Deal was socially conservative in many ways, with its central focus being on a family wage allowing one parent to work and the other to stay home. (88, 98) Maternalist feminists and their ilk, like Frances Perkins, piloted New Deal programs with this goal in mind. Once again, the opposition was composed of both more liberal feminists and corporations. But the New Deal FDR administration successfully enacted NIRA, Subsistence Homesteads, Emergency Work Projects, and other programs in ways that furthered this “family wage” goal. New Deal programs, including Social Security, actively disincentivized non-traditional family arrangements. (115) This chapter was particularly policy-focused and cuts against the common narrative of the New Deal as purely progressive. Indeed, in a different way than Peter Viereck, Carlson suggests that the New Deal sought to conserve.
The remainder of the book was less memorable to me, and seemed more amorphous. The next chapter covers how Henry Luce and Life magazine elevated the American family as part of the country’s postwar ethos in a time when Americans struggled to define themselves. He sought to build a new American order based on Christianity, freedom, and economic advancement. (148) In turn, Carlson claims, this new “value consensus” played out in American foreign policy. (178-180) While the point makes sense intuitively, I found this chapter lacked connections between intellectual ruminations on family and policy and actual policy impacts. This contrasts with the New Deal chapter, which strongly linked the two.
As the 1960s turned over into the 1970s, rising threats—to Carslon, the Sexual Revolution and neo-Malthusianism, began to threaten the national centrality of family. (208-209) Vietnam and other battles further gnawed at the ties sustaining this national consensus. And in the 1970s, this culminated in the left choosing equity feminism instead of maternalist feminism, with “pro-family progressivism mount(ing) its last stand.” (232) In Carlosn’s telling, equity feminists moved into the Democratic party during this time as social conservatives shifted Republican. (244) See Daniel William’s book and Mark Stricherz’s books for a great tale of how this happened. All the while, the maternalist perspective faded—major institutions advanced a more liberatory view, and the economy had by then moved away from the family wage system. President Reagan advanced some pro-family policies merged with pro-market ones (249-250), reflecting the Republicans’ fusionist approach.
Carlson concludes on a strong note, reminding us all about what matters most. “Only natural and internalized restraints-respect for motherhood, sanctification of the family, concern for the home economy, esteem for the natural communities that shelter families-can hold the modern American corporate state in balance with human values, in domestic matters as well as in foreign adventures and trade.” (259)
As Pope Leo XIII stated in Rerum Novarum, the family “has rights and duties peculiar to itself which are quite independent of the State.” Id. at 12. The state must support, but not displace or absorb the individual or the family. Id. at 35. Catholic Social Teaching, which heavily influences Carlson, has always put family at the center of a healthy and functioning society. For the reasons Carlson notes, we’ve lost sight of that at various times over history. I might quibble with some of why he thinks family has slipped by the wayside, but his conclusion is correct.
The times may seem difficult, yet with a new Pope Leo, and politicians once again talking about supporting families, I feel hopeful. Republicans are implementing Baby Bonds (an exciting policy) and Democrats advocate for more paid leave. In both parties, a pro-housing agenda promises to perhaps finally lower housing prices. We’re in a unique moment, and perhaps Americans can tap into the country’s long history of supporting families, a history Carlson recounts well.
He begins with the early 1900s, convincingly arguing that Theodore Roosevelt sought to build a new American identity based on family and not, like some historians posit, on racial lines. (3) Carlson argues that Teddy's mention of "race" was more expansive, covering Americans as an ethnicity. Roosevelt tied American nationalism to birthrates and advocated policies like differential taxation for child-rearing families. Today, JD Vance and others on the new right pursue the same narrative and some of the same policies.
Carlson moves on to describe how German-American family values permeated the broader culture and melded with the rising trend of Settlement Houses. Together, they forged an integrationist American culture that rejected old xenophobia and united around support for strong family units. (27) This movement, largely led by women, birthed (pun intended) numerous programs to help expecting mothers and babies. America's self-understanding became more communitarian, which further precipitated legislation like the Sheppard-Tower act. Interestingly, the American Medical Association teamed up with corporate interests and equity feminists to oppose legislation to help mother and babies. (81)
The New Deal built on this pro-family culture to enact policy supporting families. Carlson points out in this section that the New Deal was socially conservative in many ways, with its central focus being on a family wage allowing one parent to work and the other to stay home. (88, 98) Maternalist feminists and their ilk, like Frances Perkins, piloted New Deal programs with this goal in mind. Once again, the opposition was composed of both more liberal feminists and corporations. But the New Deal FDR administration successfully enacted NIRA, Subsistence Homesteads, Emergency Work Projects, and other programs in ways that furthered this “family wage” goal. New Deal programs, including Social Security, actively disincentivized non-traditional family arrangements. (115) This chapter was particularly policy-focused and cuts against the common narrative of the New Deal as purely progressive. Indeed, in a different way than Peter Viereck, Carlson suggests that the New Deal sought to conserve.
The remainder of the book was less memorable to me, and seemed more amorphous. The next chapter covers how Henry Luce and Life magazine elevated the American family as part of the country’s postwar ethos in a time when Americans struggled to define themselves. He sought to build a new American order based on Christianity, freedom, and economic advancement. (148) In turn, Carlson claims, this new “value consensus” played out in American foreign policy. (178-180) While the point makes sense intuitively, I found this chapter lacked connections between intellectual ruminations on family and policy and actual policy impacts. This contrasts with the New Deal chapter, which strongly linked the two.
As the 1960s turned over into the 1970s, rising threats—to Carslon, the Sexual Revolution and neo-Malthusianism, began to threaten the national centrality of family. (208-209) Vietnam and other battles further gnawed at the ties sustaining this national consensus. And in the 1970s, this culminated in the left choosing equity feminism instead of maternalist feminism, with “pro-family progressivism mount(ing) its last stand.” (232) In Carlosn’s telling, equity feminists moved into the Democratic party during this time as social conservatives shifted Republican. (244) See Daniel William’s book and Mark Stricherz’s books for a great tale of how this happened. All the while, the maternalist perspective faded—major institutions advanced a more liberatory view, and the economy had by then moved away from the family wage system. President Reagan advanced some pro-family policies merged with pro-market ones (249-250), reflecting the Republicans’ fusionist approach.
Carlson concludes on a strong note, reminding us all about what matters most. “Only natural and internalized restraints-respect for motherhood, sanctification of the family, concern for the home economy, esteem for the natural communities that shelter families-can hold the modern American corporate state in balance with human values, in domestic matters as well as in foreign adventures and trade.” (259)
As Pope Leo XIII stated in Rerum Novarum, the family “has rights and duties peculiar to itself which are quite independent of the State.” Id. at 12. The state must support, but not displace or absorb the individual or the family. Id. at 35. Catholic Social Teaching, which heavily influences Carlson, has always put family at the center of a healthy and functioning society. For the reasons Carlson notes, we’ve lost sight of that at various times over history. I might quibble with some of why he thinks family has slipped by the wayside, but his conclusion is correct.
The times may seem difficult, yet with a new Pope Leo, and politicians once again talking about supporting families, I feel hopeful. Republicans are implementing Baby Bonds (an exciting policy) and Democrats advocate for more paid leave. In both parties, a pro-housing agenda promises to perhaps finally lower housing prices. We’re in a unique moment, and perhaps Americans can tap into the country’s long history of supporting families, a history Carlson recounts well.
August 7, 2023
This is a fascinating book. Carlson really does follow through on the promise to show how conceptions of family and community helped to shape America. There is also more than a hint that this is meant to be a polemic in favor of that traditional concept as it developed, especially under the influence of 19th century German immigration. He is highly favorable toward the pro-family social progressivism of the early 20th century (think Americans like Theodore Roosevelt, Brits like Chesterton).
This was intellectually one of the most interesting things I've listened to in a long time, one of those books I'll now purchase in hard copy; in order to move through more slowly and take-in the charts and footnotes.
This was intellectually one of the most interesting things I've listened to in a long time, one of those books I'll now purchase in hard copy; in order to move through more slowly and take-in the charts and footnotes.
August 22, 2023
There was quite a bit of interesting facts of American history that I had no clue about involving the American view of the family and how that has changed over the centuries. A lot of the book was hard for me to keep up with, but overall very informative. We did have it right at one point in time (the proper view of the family I mean) but it was built on the shaky foundation of cultural whims and government policies rather than the commandment of God. It is going to take a lot of work to recover that in our current culture, but I think the solution lies more with individual Christian families living their lives as God commands unapologetically for lasting change to take place.
November 21, 2023
Excellent - have you ever asked the question "how did we get here?"?
The answer to that question is like a blanket made up of thousands of individual strands of yarn, each with it's own unique history. This book seeks to provide some context to that question as it relates to the American family unit, and it's evolution over time.
Highly recommend as a useful history supplement when considering modern American history.
The answer to that question is like a blanket made up of thousands of individual strands of yarn, each with it's own unique history. This book seeks to provide some context to that question as it relates to the American family unit, and it's evolution over time.
Highly recommend as a useful history supplement when considering modern American history.
October 6, 2024
Very interesting book, and well written. Academic, but strong and engaging prose. Very “Hillsdale-esque,” so the drawback is that it is often a bit too intellectually ecumenical. Worth the read, nevertheless.
November 27, 2025
Great listen
January 8, 2026
Carlson does a phenomonal job walking through the rise and fall of welfare for the sake of the Americn family.
December 3, 2023
If you are looking for a history of the family, specifically from the context of early American life, this is a good spot to begin. The life and appreciation of families, what makes a good family a good family, family engagement and importance, and why families are (or were) the foundation for the American way are all found in this book. Conversely, to see how far we have fallen in understanding and seeking for the furtherance of the family unit in our culture today is stark. This book is more history than theology proper, but I only say that for category reasons - not because it is a negative aspect.
July 18, 2015
Excellent brief historical survey of how we went from a nation built on the family economy to the radical disintegration of economics and family that we have today. And, if you are a rock-ribbed hater of all things related to the New Deal, this book might make you see some good in FDR's plan.
Read
December 16, 2017None
November 30, 2023
A commentary on the changes of sentiment and function of the family mostly through the lense of political administrations over the years. A fascinating lense with keen observations.
December 7, 2023
Carlson writes a good account of the history of the American family, and the US government's position to it. I certainly learned quite a bit, good read.
December 8, 2023
Amazing. Tempted to re-read it immediately.
August 31, 2024
Okay but a little dry at times.
April 16, 2025
Fascinating and sad.
June 3, 2025
Quite an interesting book. Listened to it, but need to read it to really get the most out of it. Lays some historical framework for where we are culturally.
Displaying 1 - 27 of 27 reviews