What do you think?
Rate this book
Semantics
The third edition of this popular textbook provides an engaging and accessible introduction to semantics for students new to the field.
480 pages, Paperback
First published April 19, 1996
62 people are currently reading
468 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 23 of 23 reviews
Currently reading
November 9, 2013Words are hard.
January 23, 2017
As much philosophy as linguistics. Seems no one is completely sure how to analyze meaning in language, but plenty of people are ready to theorize.
Update: After studying more linguistics, I see that many of the concepts and theories introduced in this book have practical use in the study of syntax. I have found myself going back to Saeed for a concise explanation of ideas from relatively recent literature that are being used in theories of syntax.
Update: After studying more linguistics, I see that many of the concepts and theories introduced in this book have practical use in the study of syntax. I have found myself going back to Saeed for a concise explanation of ideas from relatively recent literature that are being used in theories of syntax.
February 25, 2024
Semantics more like pedantics
Seriously though Saeed provides a strong, broad introduction to semantics that is certainly readable, with good references and exercises. However, it being readable doesn't necessarily make it fun. I'm not asking for some GCSE level revision guide with puns every page, but some sketch of the practical applications of semantic theory would be good, as would an attempt to present semantic theories in a more invigorating fashion, building upon each other over the course of the book rather than hopping about haphazardly. Still, a worthwhile introduction.
Seriously though Saeed provides a strong, broad introduction to semantics that is certainly readable, with good references and exercises. However, it being readable doesn't necessarily make it fun. I'm not asking for some GCSE level revision guide with puns every page, but some sketch of the practical applications of semantic theory would be good, as would an attempt to present semantic theories in a more invigorating fashion, building upon each other over the course of the book rather than hopping about haphazardly. Still, a worthwhile introduction.
November 28, 2025
John Saeed’s ‘Semantics’ has, over multiple editions, become one of the keystone introductory texts for the study of linguistic meaning. It belongs to that rare category of textbooks that manage to be rigorous without being forbidding, comprehensive without being bloated, and theoretically neutral while still being intellectually committed.
In a field as conceptually layered and philosophically fraught as semantics, this balance is not just admirable—it is structurally necessary. Meaning, after all, is not a single phenomenon but a constellation of interpretive levels: lexical relations, truth conditions, reference, sense, compositionality, metaphor, cognition, and pragmatic interface. Saeed approaches this constellation with measured clarity, unpacking the discipline piece by piece until the reader is not merely informed but oriented.
The book begins by establishing semantics as the study of linguistic meaning distinct from—but in dialogue with—syntax, pragmatics, semiotics, and cognitive linguistics.
Saeed resists defining the field through a single theoretical lens. Instead, he offers a typological introduction to the ways meaning has been modelled, debated, and revised across different linguistic traditions. Terms like ‘referent’, ‘sense’, ‘proposition’, ‘predicate’, ‘denotation’, ‘extension’, and ‘intension’ are not projected as final truths but as working instruments—tools with histories and shifting theoretical weight.
This pluralistic stance avoids the trap of implying that semantics is a solved system. It acknowledges the discipline as evolving: from early philosophical semantics grounded in Fregean logic, to structuralist sense relations, to generative semantics, to truth-conditional approaches, to cognitive and usage-based meaning models.
The opening chapters serve as orientation rather than indoctrination, and this tone becomes a quiet thematic throughline: meaning is explored, not imposed.
One of the strongest features of ‘Semantics’ is its treatment of lexical meaning. Saeed delves into polysemy, synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy, meronymy, and componential analysis—concepts typically taught as surface-level vocabulary relations—but he reframes them as theoretical outcomes of how speakers mentally categorize reality.
Componential analysis becomes more than feature decomposition; it becomes a model of semantic structure informed by prototype theory, markedness, and cognitive categorization.
Saeed shows how meaning cannot be reduced to binary features alone. For example, the semantic field of kinship terms across languages reveals variance not just in labels but in conceptual distinctions: gender, lineage, relative age, marital ties, social status.
A term like English ‘cousin’ compresses distinctions that other languages require. Likewise, lexical gaps—words that exist in one language but not another—are discussed not as curiosities but as evidence that linguistic meaning reflects cultural ontology rather than universal conceptual frames.
The chapter on reference and sense offers a particularly elegant walkthrough of classical philosophical semantics. Saeed explains Frege’s distinction between ‘sense’ (‘Sinn’) and ‘reference’ (‘Bedeutung’) with accessible examples, articulating how two phrases may refer to the same entity while offering different modes of presentation: ‘the morning star’ vs. ‘the evening star’.
He contextualizes the theory through contrast with Russellian descriptions and subsequent critiques concerning definite descriptions, presuppositions, and referential intention.
The reader is introduced to the famous debates not as abstract philosophical puzzles but as issues linguists must resolve when modelling natural language interpretation. Saeed’s structure here is exemplary: theory → example → counterexample → revision → modern view.
As the text progresses, the discussion shifts toward sentence meaning and truth-conditional semantics—the area many students find abstract. Saeed disarms this difficulty by providing graded examples and by demonstrating how semantic rules interact with syntax and logical form.
He explains quantification, scope, entailment, contradiction, presupposition, and analytic versus synthetic statements in ways that maintain logical rigor without unnecessary symbolic density. Montague Grammar—often intimidating for beginners—is introduced not as a full formal system but as a conceptual milestone demonstrating that natural language can be modelled with logical precision.
Entailment and implicative relations are presented with clarity. Saeed distinguishes between inference types:
1) ‘ ‘‘entailment’’ (logical necessity),
2) ‘ ‘‘presupposition’’ (assumed truth),
3) ‘ ‘‘contradiction’’,
4) ‘ ‘‘analyticity’’, and
5) ‘ ‘‘tautology’’, providing examples that illuminate the delicate interplay between form, meaning, and inference.
For instance, the difference between ‘The king of France is bald’ and ‘The king of France is not bald’ is used to demonstrate how presupposition survives negation—a point central to pragmatic interface theories.
Perhaps the most engaging part for intermediate and advanced readers is Saeed’s treatment of semantic roles and thematic relations. Rather than treating roles like ‘agent’, ‘patient’, ‘experiencer’, ‘theme’, and ‘instrument’ as rigid categories, he demonstrates how cross-linguistic variation and cognitive constraints shape how languages encode events. Role hierarchies, mapping principles, and argument structure are discussed in relation to syntax, cognitive event schemas, and lexical templates. This prepares the ground for later chapters on semantic decomposition and predicate logic.
Meaning in context—where semantics meets pragmatics—is handled with respect for theoretical boundaries but without artificial rigidity. Saeed traces the historical division of labour between the fields: semantics as literal, pragmatics as inferred. Yet he foregrounds debates that challenge the neatness of that division.
Relevance theory, contextualism, and theories of lexical underspecification all appear here as evidence that meaning is not simply encoded or inferred, but co-constructed.
Metaphor, idioms, and figurative language could have been relegated to a marginal chapter, but Saeed elevates them, positioning them not as linguistic anomalies but as windows into conceptual structure.
Drawing on Lakoff and Johnson’s conceptual metaphor theory, he argues convincingly that metaphor reveals deep-level cognitive mappings rather than literary ornamentation. Idiomatic constructions, similarly, are used to highlight the tension between compositionality and stored holistic meaning—one of the central unresolved tensions in semantics.
The final chapters engage with cognitive semantics, prototype theory, and mental spaces. Here the book demonstrates its pedagogical intelligence: earlier chapters grounded the reader in formal semantics, truth conditions, logical form, and referential theory.
Once that grounding is established, Saeed introduces cognitive perspectives not as contradictions to formality but as alternative models targeting different aspects of meaning. This sequencing prevents cognitive semantics from appearing speculative and formal semantics from appearing mechanical. Instead, the reader sees meaning as multi-layered: logical, psychological, cultural, embodied, and inferential.
Pedagogically, the text excels. Each chapter includes exercises designed not for rote completion but for conceptual reinforcement. Many invite reflection, cross-linguistic comparison, and application to natural data.
The examples span English, typologically diverse languages, and constructed cases, which prevents semantic theory from collapsing into Anglocentric assumptions. Importantly, Saeed does not shy away from unsolved problems. He gestures repeatedly toward areas where consensus is limited—polysemy, event structure, underspecification, scalar implicature, and compositionality in metaphor—and encourages the student to think of semantics not as a static body of knowledge but as an active field of inquiry.
The tone throughout remains accessible without compromising depth. Saeed has the rare ability to introduce complex ideas in prose that feels conversational without becoming casual.
He writes as if assuming the reader is capable, curious, and ready to think but may need a steady hand when navigating theoretical discontinuities. His voice is neither authoritarian nor evasive; it is invitational.
The significance of ‘Semantics’ in the broader academic ecosystem is perhaps best understood in relation to other landmark works: Katz and Fodor’s formalism, Partee’s model-theoretic collections, Cruse’s lexical semantics, and Levinson’s pragmatics. Saeed occupies the role of synthesizer. He does not attempt to overthrow theoretical traditions; he brings them into conversation. And in a discipline where intellectual loyalties can run doctrinal, this pluralism matters.
Reading Saeed in 2025 feels timely. As artificial intelligence, computational modelling, and neurolinguistics accelerate, semantics is no longer confined to philosophical analysis—it is now embedded in natural language processing, cognitive modelling, and multimodal communication studies.
Questions once confined to theoretical linguistics now intersect with algorithmic inference, semantic parsing, and embodied cognition. Saeed’s framework—particularly its balance of logical clarity and cognitive openness—aligns well with this interdisciplinary future.
And yet the book’s enduring strength may not lie solely in its ability to teach, but in its ability to shift the reader’s relationship with language itself. Once you internalize semantic relations, compositionality, inference patterns, and conceptual structure, everyday language begins to appear different.
Ordinary sentences reveal hidden architecture. Ambiguity becomes a design feature rather than a flaw. Words no longer feel arbitrary; they feel structured—historically inherited, conceptually motivated, cognitively grounded.
Toward the end, the experience of reading Saeed becomes less like absorbing a textbook and more like acquiring a lens.
The structure of meaning, once invisible, begins to surface everywhere: in metaphors we no longer notice, in politeness strategies disguised as literal queries, in logical contradictions embedded in idiomatic speech, in the cognitive scaffolding behind categorization and reference.
In that sense, ‘Semantics’ operates on two registers. On the academic register, it serves as an authoritative, balanced, and deeply clear introduction to the discipline. But on the intellectual register, it quietly provokes. It invites the reader to question how meaning happens—not as a passive fact of language, but as an active negotiation between structure, cognition, culture, and interaction.
Finishing the book feels a little like finishing a map—not because everything is now known, but because the landscape finally has shape.
There are paths one can follow, forks where theories diverge, contested territories still under debate. The complexity remains, but it becomes navigable.
Years later, when returning to the text—not for study, but to check a detail, revisit a framework, compare an argument—you discover that the book has become something more than instructional. It has become foundational: a reference point against which new theories can be measured and old ideas reinterpreted.
And perhaps that is the true sign of a great linguistic text: not that it answers every question, but that it equips the reader to ask better ones.
An eternal classic. Most recommended.
In a field as conceptually layered and philosophically fraught as semantics, this balance is not just admirable—it is structurally necessary. Meaning, after all, is not a single phenomenon but a constellation of interpretive levels: lexical relations, truth conditions, reference, sense, compositionality, metaphor, cognition, and pragmatic interface. Saeed approaches this constellation with measured clarity, unpacking the discipline piece by piece until the reader is not merely informed but oriented.
The book begins by establishing semantics as the study of linguistic meaning distinct from—but in dialogue with—syntax, pragmatics, semiotics, and cognitive linguistics.
Saeed resists defining the field through a single theoretical lens. Instead, he offers a typological introduction to the ways meaning has been modelled, debated, and revised across different linguistic traditions. Terms like ‘referent’, ‘sense’, ‘proposition’, ‘predicate’, ‘denotation’, ‘extension’, and ‘intension’ are not projected as final truths but as working instruments—tools with histories and shifting theoretical weight.
This pluralistic stance avoids the trap of implying that semantics is a solved system. It acknowledges the discipline as evolving: from early philosophical semantics grounded in Fregean logic, to structuralist sense relations, to generative semantics, to truth-conditional approaches, to cognitive and usage-based meaning models.
The opening chapters serve as orientation rather than indoctrination, and this tone becomes a quiet thematic throughline: meaning is explored, not imposed.
One of the strongest features of ‘Semantics’ is its treatment of lexical meaning. Saeed delves into polysemy, synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy, meronymy, and componential analysis—concepts typically taught as surface-level vocabulary relations—but he reframes them as theoretical outcomes of how speakers mentally categorize reality.
Componential analysis becomes more than feature decomposition; it becomes a model of semantic structure informed by prototype theory, markedness, and cognitive categorization.
Saeed shows how meaning cannot be reduced to binary features alone. For example, the semantic field of kinship terms across languages reveals variance not just in labels but in conceptual distinctions: gender, lineage, relative age, marital ties, social status.
A term like English ‘cousin’ compresses distinctions that other languages require. Likewise, lexical gaps—words that exist in one language but not another—are discussed not as curiosities but as evidence that linguistic meaning reflects cultural ontology rather than universal conceptual frames.
The chapter on reference and sense offers a particularly elegant walkthrough of classical philosophical semantics. Saeed explains Frege’s distinction between ‘sense’ (‘Sinn’) and ‘reference’ (‘Bedeutung’) with accessible examples, articulating how two phrases may refer to the same entity while offering different modes of presentation: ‘the morning star’ vs. ‘the evening star’.
He contextualizes the theory through contrast with Russellian descriptions and subsequent critiques concerning definite descriptions, presuppositions, and referential intention.
The reader is introduced to the famous debates not as abstract philosophical puzzles but as issues linguists must resolve when modelling natural language interpretation. Saeed’s structure here is exemplary: theory → example → counterexample → revision → modern view.
As the text progresses, the discussion shifts toward sentence meaning and truth-conditional semantics—the area many students find abstract. Saeed disarms this difficulty by providing graded examples and by demonstrating how semantic rules interact with syntax and logical form.
He explains quantification, scope, entailment, contradiction, presupposition, and analytic versus synthetic statements in ways that maintain logical rigor without unnecessary symbolic density. Montague Grammar—often intimidating for beginners—is introduced not as a full formal system but as a conceptual milestone demonstrating that natural language can be modelled with logical precision.
Entailment and implicative relations are presented with clarity. Saeed distinguishes between inference types:
1) ‘ ‘‘entailment’’ (logical necessity),
2) ‘ ‘‘presupposition’’ (assumed truth),
3) ‘ ‘‘contradiction’’,
4) ‘ ‘‘analyticity’’, and
5) ‘ ‘‘tautology’’, providing examples that illuminate the delicate interplay between form, meaning, and inference.
For instance, the difference between ‘The king of France is bald’ and ‘The king of France is not bald’ is used to demonstrate how presupposition survives negation—a point central to pragmatic interface theories.
Perhaps the most engaging part for intermediate and advanced readers is Saeed’s treatment of semantic roles and thematic relations. Rather than treating roles like ‘agent’, ‘patient’, ‘experiencer’, ‘theme’, and ‘instrument’ as rigid categories, he demonstrates how cross-linguistic variation and cognitive constraints shape how languages encode events. Role hierarchies, mapping principles, and argument structure are discussed in relation to syntax, cognitive event schemas, and lexical templates. This prepares the ground for later chapters on semantic decomposition and predicate logic.
Meaning in context—where semantics meets pragmatics—is handled with respect for theoretical boundaries but without artificial rigidity. Saeed traces the historical division of labour between the fields: semantics as literal, pragmatics as inferred. Yet he foregrounds debates that challenge the neatness of that division.
Relevance theory, contextualism, and theories of lexical underspecification all appear here as evidence that meaning is not simply encoded or inferred, but co-constructed.
Metaphor, idioms, and figurative language could have been relegated to a marginal chapter, but Saeed elevates them, positioning them not as linguistic anomalies but as windows into conceptual structure.
Drawing on Lakoff and Johnson’s conceptual metaphor theory, he argues convincingly that metaphor reveals deep-level cognitive mappings rather than literary ornamentation. Idiomatic constructions, similarly, are used to highlight the tension between compositionality and stored holistic meaning—one of the central unresolved tensions in semantics.
The final chapters engage with cognitive semantics, prototype theory, and mental spaces. Here the book demonstrates its pedagogical intelligence: earlier chapters grounded the reader in formal semantics, truth conditions, logical form, and referential theory.
Once that grounding is established, Saeed introduces cognitive perspectives not as contradictions to formality but as alternative models targeting different aspects of meaning. This sequencing prevents cognitive semantics from appearing speculative and formal semantics from appearing mechanical. Instead, the reader sees meaning as multi-layered: logical, psychological, cultural, embodied, and inferential.
Pedagogically, the text excels. Each chapter includes exercises designed not for rote completion but for conceptual reinforcement. Many invite reflection, cross-linguistic comparison, and application to natural data.
The examples span English, typologically diverse languages, and constructed cases, which prevents semantic theory from collapsing into Anglocentric assumptions. Importantly, Saeed does not shy away from unsolved problems. He gestures repeatedly toward areas where consensus is limited—polysemy, event structure, underspecification, scalar implicature, and compositionality in metaphor—and encourages the student to think of semantics not as a static body of knowledge but as an active field of inquiry.
The tone throughout remains accessible without compromising depth. Saeed has the rare ability to introduce complex ideas in prose that feels conversational without becoming casual.
He writes as if assuming the reader is capable, curious, and ready to think but may need a steady hand when navigating theoretical discontinuities. His voice is neither authoritarian nor evasive; it is invitational.
The significance of ‘Semantics’ in the broader academic ecosystem is perhaps best understood in relation to other landmark works: Katz and Fodor’s formalism, Partee’s model-theoretic collections, Cruse’s lexical semantics, and Levinson’s pragmatics. Saeed occupies the role of synthesizer. He does not attempt to overthrow theoretical traditions; he brings them into conversation. And in a discipline where intellectual loyalties can run doctrinal, this pluralism matters.
Reading Saeed in 2025 feels timely. As artificial intelligence, computational modelling, and neurolinguistics accelerate, semantics is no longer confined to philosophical analysis—it is now embedded in natural language processing, cognitive modelling, and multimodal communication studies.
Questions once confined to theoretical linguistics now intersect with algorithmic inference, semantic parsing, and embodied cognition. Saeed’s framework—particularly its balance of logical clarity and cognitive openness—aligns well with this interdisciplinary future.
And yet the book’s enduring strength may not lie solely in its ability to teach, but in its ability to shift the reader’s relationship with language itself. Once you internalize semantic relations, compositionality, inference patterns, and conceptual structure, everyday language begins to appear different.
Ordinary sentences reveal hidden architecture. Ambiguity becomes a design feature rather than a flaw. Words no longer feel arbitrary; they feel structured—historically inherited, conceptually motivated, cognitively grounded.
Toward the end, the experience of reading Saeed becomes less like absorbing a textbook and more like acquiring a lens.
The structure of meaning, once invisible, begins to surface everywhere: in metaphors we no longer notice, in politeness strategies disguised as literal queries, in logical contradictions embedded in idiomatic speech, in the cognitive scaffolding behind categorization and reference.
In that sense, ‘Semantics’ operates on two registers. On the academic register, it serves as an authoritative, balanced, and deeply clear introduction to the discipline. But on the intellectual register, it quietly provokes. It invites the reader to question how meaning happens—not as a passive fact of language, but as an active negotiation between structure, cognition, culture, and interaction.
Finishing the book feels a little like finishing a map—not because everything is now known, but because the landscape finally has shape.
There are paths one can follow, forks where theories diverge, contested territories still under debate. The complexity remains, but it becomes navigable.
Years later, when returning to the text—not for study, but to check a detail, revisit a framework, compare an argument—you discover that the book has become something more than instructional. It has become foundational: a reference point against which new theories can be measured and old ideas reinterpreted.
And perhaps that is the true sign of a great linguistic text: not that it answers every question, but that it equips the reader to ask better ones.
An eternal classic. Most recommended.
January 26, 2023
it is extremly difficult to understand the meaning of many key meanings in Semantics
March 15, 2019
Saeed does a good job providing a (cognitive) theoretical framework for descriptive semantics. I am not so interested in theory, but his writing style was straightforward enough.
Kroeger’s recent semantics book follows this one in content in a lot of ways, but provides a lot less theory and a lot more diagnostics for language analysis.
Kroeger’s recent semantics book follows this one in content in a lot of ways, but provides a lot less theory and a lot more diagnostics for language analysis.
May 2, 2022
Todo cuenta y más un libro como este que no ha sido fácil y ha requerido tiempo.
Denso y concentrado, me ha costado terminarlo. Pero ya está, ahora a repasar. Sí, es un libro de texto; no lo he hecho por afición a la semántica aunque algunas partes pueden ser interesantes.
Denso y concentrado, me ha costado terminarlo. Pero ya está, ahora a repasar. Sí, es un libro de texto; no lo he hecho por afición a la semántica aunque algunas partes pueden ser interesantes.
January 24, 2025
Read through chapter 5 for the exams (should have gone till chapter 8 but couldn't)
Nice read but again, not for the exams. We really need to have a talk about the way the material is examined in my uni....cool book though
Nice read but again, not for the exams. We really need to have a talk about the way the material is examined in my uni....cool book though
November 24, 2019
Detailed ,yet interesting to read and very useful.
November 21, 2024
A decent introduction to the subject.
November 25, 2024
I hope linguists start agreeing on things soon. stop arguing guys :((
Ironically, I have noticed linguistics textbooks tend to be unnecessarily wordy and this is no exception.
Ironically, I have noticed linguistics textbooks tend to be unnecessarily wordy and this is no exception.
January 24, 2016
Basic and very readable intro to semantics. Saeed writes very well, and includes lots of examples and exercises to his chapters. The book covers mostly everything within this subject, and the author does a good job presenting different theories and prominent names.
Very well organised and conducted. I would definately recommend this as an introduction to elementary semantics.
Includes exercises (and solutions) and suggestions for further reading at the end of each chapter, bibliography, and word index.
Very well organised and conducted. I would definately recommend this as an introduction to elementary semantics.
Includes exercises (and solutions) and suggestions for further reading at the end of each chapter, bibliography, and word index.
July 22, 2016
It does its job. I'm finding it hard to rate the book as I'm simply not that into semantics as compared to syntax or morphology. Still, it's very approachable, covers its ground, easy to read. The book is also well organized.
April 16, 2008
This is a fun and readable introduction to semantics. It covers the major areas of the very broad field of semantics and pragmatics quite nicely. The exercises in this book are generally helpful.
Currently reading
June 4, 2011I'm actually reading the 3rd ed.
Read
May 25, 2012important book
Read
August 13, 201624/30 books read in 2015.
This is a good book if you want to learn about semantics. It covers all the bases. But it definitely isn't an easy read.
This is a good book if you want to learn about semantics. It covers all the bases. But it definitely isn't an easy read.
December 24, 2015
بسیاری از مطالب با کتاب معنی شناسی دکتر صفوی اورلپ داشت ولی برای آشنایی با عبارات و اصطلاحات تخصصی معنی شناسی خواندن این کتاب می تواند مفید باشد.
Read
December 1, 2015very good book
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Read
January 21, 2018how can get full detail about synonyms
Read
April 4, 2018Iummato
Displaying 1 - 23 of 23 reviews