Overall a good read- I personally think Siegel misunderstands/misrepresents certain ideas in mathematics and Marxism when establishing his central thesis, but these are not foundational to his argument and therefore can be swept aside. I think he leans too much into Jungian analysis for me to take 100% seriously; however, his conception of the “narrator as character”, a “… contemporary individual trying to invent, to ‘’assemble’’ a self with which to confront our world” is really valuable in trying to understand the novel. While I don’t wholeheartedly agree with his analysis, its helped me to clarify some of my thoughts and understanding in reaction. Very nice.
The first full length critical look at Gravity's Rainbow published in 1978. It still holds up extremely well. To me, this is a foundational text in the understanding and explication of Pynchon's masterpiece. And, as an aside, I have read through Gravity's Rainbow 7 times since first published.