I've read and listened to a fair bit of Charlie Eccleshare over the last couple of years, both on the Athletic website and the Football Cliches podcast, and was excited to read this as a result. I was... a little disappointed with the book; while what was there was fairly good, there just wasn't all that much of it.
Eccleshare has a very good ear for commentary, and a good sense of the role it's supposed to fulfil and the notes it's supposed to hit. The way he talks about each of the commentators featured in the book is engaging and evocative - he just doesn't do it often enough for my liking.
He also seems to be caught up with the idea that the book is some sort of academic deconstruction - but he doesn't really commit to it, so we end up with a very short, very formulaic breakdown of each of the snippets of commentary that might, on a good day, have gotten me a C in my English A-Level class 20 years ago. There just isn't very much insight in these passages - it's just "by using X, the commentator creates a Y effect." Very staccato and not terribly interesting. (Unless you happen to want to know the classical names of various esoteric rhetorical devices - in which case, you're in luck.)
I'd have loved a longer and more in-depth exploration of the strengths of each of the commentators, what they do differently, and the various ways in which they engage the listener. Something like a more direct comparison of a Barry Davies or Martin Tyler moment, where they let the silence speak for itself for a few seconds before saying *just* the right thing, versus a Jonathan Pearce moment where he talks his way fluently through everything. We don't get that, unfortunately, except for the occasional passing comment, and I'm kind of annoyed that we don't because I think Eccleshare could have done it brilliantly. But that might be a 'me' problem. I'm hoping this is an aperitif, a mere amuse-bouche, and we get something like that sort of depth in a future book.