Unexpected Irony for the Materialist
Our society, especially (and incongruently) our scientific cultural elite, insists that the science is settled with respect to the random forces that are responsible for earthly life and all its complexities. Humankind is simply the happenstance result of a process that ultimately favors beneficial undirected changes. Only materialistic explanations are worthy of consideration. Supernatural explanations, regardless of the evidence, are rejected axiomatically. The unexpected Irony is that as scientific understanding progresses, the evidence appears more and more to be suggestive of purpose than randomness in human existence and nature. The eager acceptance of materialism, born in ignorance and unproven theory, has not been supported by empirical advances, but teleology increasingly has.
In his new book, “The Miracle of Man”, scientist Michael Deaton (an MD and PhD in biochemistry) makes a compelling case for purpose apparent in many of the critical properties of nature. He demonstrates that nature itself might be viewed as having the special fitness for supporting human life. Again ironically, he points out that the unique fitness of nature for human life, the human-centeredness of nature, was the prevailing expectation throughout most of history in one form or another. Then, as Denton marks it, in 1543 certain advances in scientific understanding (in cosmology and anatomy) opened the door for alternatives to anthropocentric explanations for nature. The materialistic alternatives gained influence and predominance, reaching an apex of sorts with Darwin’s theory of evolution in the nineteenth century. However, scientific understanding still was in its infancy (perhaps it still is) and unknowledgeable of so many things that are understood now. Denton takes the reader on a fascinating journey through many aspects of our natural world that once again increasingly point to a human-centered fitness throughout nature.