Because I grew up going to Quabbin for picnics and being fascinated by the stone walls and traces of roads leading into the water, I tend to read anything I come across about it. While this book makes a couple of important points, in other ways it was a disappointment.
The archival photos are terrific and I'd probably buy a book that was nothing but the photos from the archives. She also states in the introduction what I was beginning to think - that we can't forget the land where the four towns were located was originally home to thriving communities of native people eradicated by the Puritans. We have a tendency to get all empathetic and woe-is-me over stories like Quabbin and pay no mind to the black communities eradicated to build Central Park or any number of urban expressways. I just can't hear the story of Quabbin the same way I did when I was a teenager.
I was hoping for more about the actual towns, and I found it rather dull to have half the book be about the Enfield anniversary celebrations in 1916 so I started to skim. The information about the political process that led to the creation of Quabbin is something I have not seen documented elsewhere, although the "country must die so city can live" narrative became a little tiresome - it isn't just Boston that has a municipal water system. Sadly the towns would probably have died soon anyway because their manufacturing base was going to disappear.
Yes, I'd have hated to have to move under such circumstances and it's very sad; for some reason this book failed to engage my sympathy. And Marion Smith, the woman who is at the center of the story, ended up leaving very little money to the family who lived with and worked for her, out of a large estate, and they lost their home at her death.
It was interesting to learn how Quabbin's water gets to the municipal systems where it is used - it's moved via aqueduct to the Wachusett reservoir, I never knew that. I imagine it also feeds central Mass municipalities.
Her summary of how Shays' rebellion fed into the creation of the Constitution is a bit inaccurate and oversimplified. Hamilton and Washington don't want to create a government just so they could put down rebellions, they wanted to create a government so there would be the financial means to do things like pay the soldiers in the first place, which the individual colonies refused to do during the revolution.
On the whole I was disappointed in this book. I'll go rewatch my old Under Quabbin video instead.