RAINIER was a strange book. There were things I liked about it, and things I didn't.
I'll start with the positives: K. Lucas has skill as a writer. The story is easy to follow despite jumping around from different groups of characters, and I never thought "I should just listen to something else." Kudos for that, because I've had that thought with a lot of books recently, and books that were a lot deeper and more skillfully written. Now, let's get onto the negatives, which are several, but not deal-breaking. By the reviews, people are enjoying it, and that's great.
The setup of the story is straight-forward: Tim (who had a traumatic past with natural disasters) is now a volcanologist and he's convinced a mountain is going to explode, whereas everybody else doesn't. So, essentially, it's the beginning of the Pierce Brosnan flick, Dante's Peak. But where Pierce's character had some restraint with his belief and understood the nuances of the politics involved in his job (and issuing an eruption alert), Tim runs around like a kid throwing a tantrum. Before even meeting with his boss, he's threatening the receptionist that he'll run to the media if he doesn't get in to see her. And...that's Tim. His entire character. Nothing else.
That's another thing that struck me as odd about this book. There were zero character descriptions for anyone. There was a girl named Felicity with black hair, but that's all I caught. And Tim's evidence that the mountain's going to blow is...scary numbers. That's it, which tells me little to no research was undertaken to give the illusion of realism to the proceedings, or to make the basis for Tim's beliefs plausible. Just ride the snake.
Like with Tim, there's a lot of absent or pedestrian character psychology here, as in people don't tend to have the reactions you'd expect until later on in the book. We're introduced to Theresa, a 911 dispatcher and single mother, who, when mounting evidence that the volcano is going to erupt, decides to trust someone else to go get her kid from school so she can keep her job. The problem with that is, she's painted as a great mother, and yet even a decent mother wouldn't think twice. Go get the kid.
There are other stories that intersect, and ultimately it isn't about what you'd think it is. While it starts off as Dante's Peak, the eruption becomes an afterthought a third of the way into the story, and then the story becomes something else. No buildup to an annihilating pyroclastic flow--it just becomes about the characters and their struggles.
...and struggles aplenty they have, because RAINIER's locations seem to be populated by 99% denizens from the seventh circle of Hell. Apart from the main characters, everybody's awful, everybody turns into animals, more or less, and that's not even counting the circle of villains in the book. Who hurt you, K. Lucas?
So, those are the problems in an otherwise reasonably entertaining book. I'm not sure if I'd pick up another book by this author immediately, but down the road once some skills are honed a little more, sure. All the basic building blocks are there, the pacing is brisk and carries you through the story like a breeze, and I'm a sucker for disaster stories. Keep at it, K. Lucas.