What do you think?
Rate this book


Audible Audio
First published October 1, 1967
Excerpt from the televised debate at Avente, Alphanor, on July 10, 1521, between Gowman Hachieri, Counsel for the Planned Progress League, and Slizor Jesno, Fellow of the Institute, 98th Degree:
Hachieri:
Is it not true then that the Institute originated as a cabal of assassins?
Jesno:
To the same degree that the Planned Progress League originated as a cabal of irresponsible seditionists, traitors, suicidal hypochondriacs.
Hachieri:
This is not a pertinent response.
Jesno:
The elasticities, the areas of vagueness surrounding the terms of your question do indeed encompass the exact truth of the situation.
Hachieri:
What, then, in inelastic terms, is the truth?
Jesno:
Approximately fifteen hundred years ago, it became evident that existing laws and systems of public safety could not protect the human race from four bland and insidious dangers: First, universal and compulsory dosage of drugs, tonics, toners, conditioners, stimulants and prophylactics administered through the public water supply. Second, the development of genetic sciences, which allowed and encouraged various agencies to alter the basic character of Man, according to contemporary biological and political theory. Third, psychological control through media of public information. Fourth, the proliferation of machinery and systems which in the name of progress and social welfare tended to make enterprise, imagination, creative toil and the subsequent satisfactions obsolete if not extinct.
I will not speak of mental myopia, irresponsibility, masochism, or the efforts of persons nervously groping for a secure womb to re-enter: this is all irrelevant. The effect however was a situation analogous to the growth of four cancers in a human organism; the Institute came into being by much the same progress that the body generates a prophylactic serum.
Hachieri:
You admit that the Institute arranges assassination for persons striving to improve the human condition?
Jesno:
You beg the question.
Hachieri:
Do you murder anyone whatever?
Jesno:
I don’t care to discuss tactical theory. There are very few such events.
Hachieri:
But they occur.
Jesno:
Only in the case of absolutely flagrant offenses against the human organism.
Hachieri:
Is not your definition of ‘offense’ arbitrary? Are you not simply opposed to change? Are you not conservative to the point of stagnation?
Jesno:
To all three questions: no. We want natural organic evolution. The human race, needless to say, is not without flaws. When elements of the race attempt to cure these ills: to create an ‘ideal man’ or an ‘ideal society’, there is the certainty of overcompensation in one or another direction. The flaws, with the reaction to the flaws, create a distortion factor, a filter, and the final product is more diseased than the original. Natural evolution, the slow abrasion of man against his environment, has slowly but definitely improved the race. The optimum man, the optimum society may never eventuate. But there will never be the nightmare of the artificial man or the artificial ‘planned progress’ which the League advocates: not so long as the human race generates that highly active set of antibodies known as the Institute.
Hachieri:
This is a resonant speech. It is superficially persuasive. It is ridden with maudlin fallacy. You want man to evolve through ‘abrasion against his environment’. Other human beings are part of the environment. The League is part of the environment. We are natural; we are neither artificial nor sick. The ills of the Oikumene are by no means obscure or mysterious; they are susceptible to remedy. We of the League propose to take action. We do not intend to be dissuaded or intimidated. If we are threatened, we shall take measures to protect ourselves. We are not helpless. The Institute has tyrannized society long enough. It is time that new ideas permeated the human community.
Struggling to the hill’s crest Marmaduke searched for the blasted cypress which marked the hut of the symbologist. There stood the tree, haggard and desolate, and a hut nearby.
The symbologist gave him welcome. “A hundred leagues I have come,” said Marmaduke, “to put a single question: ‘Do the colors have souls?’”
“Did anyone aver otherwise?” asked the perplexed symbologist. He caused to shine an orange light, then, lifting the swing of his gown, cavorted with great zest. Marmaduke watched with pleasure, amused to see an old man so spry!
The symbologist brought forth green light. Crouching under the bench he thrust his head between his ankles and turned his gown outside to in, while Marmaduke clapped his hands for wonder.
The symbologist evoked red light, and leaping upon Marmaduke, playfully wrestled him to the floor and threw the gown over his head. “My dear fellow,” gasped Marmaduke winning free, “but you are brisk in your demonstration!”
“What is worth doing is worth doing well,” the symbologist replied. “Now to expatiate. The colors admit of dual import. The orange is icterine humor as well as the mirth of a dying heron.
“Green is the essence of second-thoughts, likewise the mode of the north wind. Red, as we have seen, accompanies rustic exuberance.”
“And a second import of the red?”
The symbologist made a cryptic sign. “That remains to be seen, as the cat said who voided into the sugar bowl.”
Amused and edified, Marmaduke took his leave, and he was quite halfway down the mountain before he discovered the loss of his wallet.