Out the outset, I must echo two points made by another reviewer. First, a reader should consider the Kindle version of this book, or, if available, a book on tape, because the type in the paperback edition is painfully small (8 point?). Second, do yourself a favor and read the translator's afterword before diving into the stories themselves. The afterword explains that Belorusets began as an activist and then became a photographer before turning to writing. Her photography leaned toward a journalistic/ethnographic studies approach to her subjects, an approach that is mirrored in the snapshot quality of the short stories in Lucky Breaks and their limited focus on subjects living in a particular place and time--war torn Ukraine prior to the February 23, 2022, "special military operation" mounted by Russian forces--that may be foreign to most readers.
With Belorusets' photography background in mind, one can gain a better appreciation of her short stories as capturing, on their surfaces, whatever occurs in the moment-in-time scenes framed in their compositions, without a narrator's intrusion or explanation, and deriving their storytelling ability from the actions and expressions of the characters. Although I'm not saying that the translator is wrong, I can't completely agree with the assertion that the stories are feminist in nature. It's true that the central characters in the stories are predominantly women, but more generally speaking they are the people most typically underrepresented, or completely ignored, in narratives involving wars: the non-combatant victims of collateral damage other than physical injury or death. Combat involving forces beyond their control uproots these characters from their communities, homes, jobs, relationships, and, by extension, their identities and world views. These characters are dislodged, dispossessed, disaffected, disoriented, and disillusioned, a debilitating congeries of impacts that reduce them to the status of refugees in their own country. It makes for disturbing reading, which is why my three-star rating doesn't mean that I like Lucky Breaks, but I respect it for revealing the multi-faceted complexity of war and its effects on the broader population, effects that are rarely addressed in the "which team is winning" approach that is the stock in trade of traditional journalism. Regardless of whether one country or another is declared a victor, it should be understood that these damaged lives won't then be miraculously repaired, and that the injuries may be felt, and may fester, for generations to come.