This is a useful book in that it provides an overview of many feminist and intersectional traditions that can be understood as precursors to posthumanism or simply as being the core of posthumanist theory. I certainly agree with a lot of this, and it’s useful to have it spelt out, especially since many versions of posthumanism bizarrely focus only on male authors, and people often upon hearing the word “posthuman” assume it’s about denying people humanity. However it gets a bit repetitive, and I kept waiting for the next chapter to be the “so here’s what posthuman feminism will be” or “here’s my take on it”, but instead it felt like a giant lit.review. It also left out some stuff - there’s less on technology than I’d have liked but I suppose that’s because I research technology and Braidotti doesn’t specifically. I also think she has misunderstood or maybe not read Dawkin’s Selfish Gene - it’s not anthropocentric, his whole point is to view evolution from the point of view of the individual gene, not the human, and that because we are these conglomerates of genes rather than individual humanist subjects we are fundamentally altruistic, a collective. She repeats some of her earlier arguments about affirmative ethics, connecting them very specifically to feminism. Definitely some quotable things I’ll be using here though.