very tiny summary:
Would recommend this book to anyone looking to make change, learn about strategic ways for making change and building power, and be in just relationships and community. this book is by two very seasoned, transformative, and radical organizers on how to be strategic to make impact and change. Lots of lessons, interview bits, and histories related to many many parts of organizing. key is to take action, and take action with others. we write the meaning of life as we live it, it is up to us to write a story worth living.
notes:
critique is good and fine, but focus on building things up, especially with other people. “transformative change happens when we are willing to build the things that we know must exist.” p12 we are transformed by working on issues. the most important thing to do to transform the world is to act. taking action is a practice of hope.
a big theme of the book is refusing to abandon others and being supportive of people’s transformation. For example, it is life saving work to support and work to free a criminalized person - letters etc are lifelines for those trapped behind bars. capitalism relies on the idea that there are people who must be or merit abandonment or elimination.
facts are often not enough to mobilize people into action. what works when facts fail? relationships, community, and storytelling are stronger drivers for action. relationships to create sustained capacity for organized political action. strategic storytelling centers support and inspiration, not just fear. we have to strive to receive people on the terms that many are doing the best they can and making sense of the world as best they can, even if they are believing or behaving in ways that we do not support. many people do not act on a problem despite familiarity with the problem. it’s easy to dismiss people who act against the collective good as “selfish” or “bad”, but would such characterizations help us alter the terrain? -chp 1 goes into this sort of stuff
role of organizers is not to dismiss but to invite. when correcting someone’s ignorance, do not shame etc., but invite/direct them forward. history lessons should be leveraged as calls to action in the present. seize flashes of outrage as opportunities to draw people in movements rather than reply with cynicism to their shock.
grief work, healing work, and conflict resolution extra important in this age of catastrophe. navigating crisis and even missteps are more difficult with unchecked trauma responses. as difficult and slow as it may be, it is helpful to try to work through traumas that impede organizing work.
attempting to rank atrocities is of little strategic value. much more effective to make connections between issues than compare the importance or severity of the issue. goal is to pull people into an active formation and build something, not just create a quick reaction or a witnessing.
criticism is often overflowing towards organizers, but good-faith critique is important for movement building. however criticism often comes from people with no connection to the work and may have no idea what they’re talking about. check-in with self and, if necessary, our co-strugglers to decide if this criticism merits consideration. organizers should be committed to self reflection that is self questioning and challenging.
Organizers should want co-strugglers, not fans. fans are waiting to tell the organizer they’re right and, potentially, reinforce worst and least strategic impulses.
A main goal of organizing is to try to get as many people as possible at the table having conversations about “example” system or issues and how to change it
projects and groups can be broken easily if cannot maintain relationships while navigating harm. gives importance to conflict resolution and accountability mechanisms within groups. people also need room to grow.
do not want to inspire a culture of martyrdom or self destruction. important to tend to maintenance of health and well-being. important to envision self as part of future looking to create. important to take seriously the daily, personal practices that can nurture our well-being.
Quotes:
“We all have a role to play in building those new worlds. Determine what the next right step is for you. There is always something that is worth doing. Find your lane and push ahead. Make connections with others. Refuse to acquiesce to despair. Imagine your way forward. There are many ways that things can be different in the world, and we don't know how things will turn out, so we might as well fight like hell for the world we want to inhabit.” p231
“we all have a role in imagining and building the world we want to live in”
“you are an appendage of the work, the work stems from / hangs from the heaven you create” - rant by diane di prima p2
“in order for the oppressed to be able to wage the struggle for their liberation, they must perceive the reality of oppression not as a closed world from which there is no exit, but as a limiting situation which they can transform.” - paulo freire, pedagogy of the oppressed p16
organizers offer vision of possible better world and ways to bring this vision into fruition. “Effective organizing, therefore, does not begin with having the most compelling argument or the most dazzling direct action, but with developing the capacity to bring people into relationship with one another, such that they might begin to overcome alienation and fear.” important to find intersection between someone’s interests and the work at hand, not just place people into roles envisioned for them. “'What do you want? What do you need? How can I help? Heres what we're working on. How does that sound to you? What are we missing? What else is needed»" Not Do (you want to get involved?' or 'You should get involved." “"This idea that we know better than a community (about what they need, without asking and being in conversation, isn't relationship building. It's more like political imposition," she said. "And so l think when you start with a politic of asking people what they need. or if what you're working on resonates for them, or what is missing. then you build stronger relationships than when you just say Come to the rally or Come to the meeting or Come to the event. An organizer can also ask, «What would make this more interesting and appealing for you? What would make this more interesting for the people that you know? Are there other people that you know chat want to get involved?"" We build better relationships, Dixon said, "when we build projects where people honestly have a stake in the project, not because we told them they have to, but because we've asked them what they need and we are responsive to the needs of multiple people. Taken from p38, p48-49
“As you strategize in the face of cynicism, ask yourself these questions:
What is the outcome you want?
Do your words and actions lend themselves to the creation of that outcome?
If not, how can you change them?
What is the impact you would like to have?
Do you believe you are capable of making that impact?
if so, how will you go about making it?
What power do you possess, and how are you leveraging that power in relation to the issue at hand?
We ask these questions not to prescribe answers but to provoke them.
Our aim is to be effective and invite people into a process of making change. Many, many people will decline the invitation, but even fewer will accept an invitation that is never offered. If we are determined and committed to improving our practice of organizing, some people will accept the invitation, and we will build power.” p101-102
“violence is an elastic term often deployed to vilify people who threaten the status quo” p111
“The repression of Palestinian resistance offers a profound example of the elasticity of violence as a concept and shows how, while the powerful can wage war on particular communities with impunity and claim innocence, the oppressed can be deemed a violent threat simply for attempting to assert their rights or defend their humanity.” p127
“If you choose to disrupt these systems, passively, destructively or by way of extending mutual aid, the concept of violence may be stretched and manipulated by the powerful to encompass your work. That is why we must not allow the frameworks of the power. ful co define the bounds of morality in our politics and our action.
The elastic concepts of criminality and violence, as controlled by the powerful, will always be bent against us.” p128
“The idealization of individual leaders can also encourage us to embrace ideas that are harmful or excuse behavior that should be challenged. If we become too invested in someone's leadership, or even fetishize that leadership, we can abandon our own strategic analysis or fail to develop that analysis. Good organizers do not want "fans." They want committed and thoughtful co-strugglers. An organizer who wants your allegiance rather than your solidarity and co-investment in struggle is not someone whose leadership you should trust.” p131
active hope:
“Active Hope is a practice. Like tai chi or gardening, it is something we do rather than have. It is a process we can apply to any situation, and it involves three key steps. First, we take a clear view of reality; second, we identify what we hope for in terms of the direction we'd like things to move in or the values we'd like to see expressed; and third, we take steps to move ourselves or our situation in that direc-tion. Since Active Hope doesn't require our optimism, we can apply it even in areas where we feel hopeless. The guiding impetus is intention; we choose what we aim to bring about, act for, or express. Rather than weighing our chances and proceeding only when we feel hopeful, we focus on our intention and let it be our guide.” p176
“This practice of hope allows us to remain creative and strategic. It does not require us to deny the severity of our situation or detract from our practice of grief. To practice active hope, we do not need to believe that everything will work out in the end. We need only decide who we are choosing to be and how we are choosing to function in relation to the outcome we desire and abide by what those decisions demand of us. This practice of hope does not guarantee any victories against long odds, but it does make those victories more possible. Hope, therefore, is not only a source of comfort to the afflicted but also a strategic imperative.” p176-177
“broader movements are struggles, not sanctuaries. they are full of contradiction and challenges we may feel unprepared for.” p183
“Organizing is not a process of political matchmaking. Most people's politics will not mirror our own, and even people who identify with us strongly on some points will often differ sharply on others. When organizers do not fully understand each other's beliefs or identities, people will often stumble and offend one another, even if they earnestly wish to build from a place of solidarity. Efforts to build diverse, intergenerational movements will always generate conflict and discomfort. But the desire to shrink groups down to spaces of easy agreement is not conducive to movement building.
The forces that oppress us may compete and make war with one another, but when it comes to maintaining the order of capitalism, and the hierarchy of white supremacy, they collaborate and work together based on their death-making and eliminationist shared interests. Oppressed people, on the other hand, often demand ideological alignment or even affinity when seeking to interrupt or upend structural violence. This tendency lends an advantage to the powerful that is not easily overcome.
Put simply, we need more people. What do we mean by this?
We are not talking about launching search parties to find an undiscovered army of people with already-perfected politics with whom it will easily and naturally align. Instead, organizing on the scale that our struggles demand means finding common ground with a broad spectrum of people,
many of whom we would never otherwise interact with, and building a shared practice of politics in the pursuit of more just outcomes. Its a process that can bring us into the company of people who share our beliefs quite explicitly, but to create movements,, rather than clubhouses we need to engage with people with whom we do not fully identify and may even dislike. We can build upon our expectations of such people and negotiate protocols around matters of respect, but the truth is, we will sometimes be uncomfortable or even offended. We will, at times, have to constructively critique people's behavior or simply allow them room to grow.
There will be other times, of course, when we have to draw hard lines, but if we cannot organize beyond the bounds of our comfort zones, we will never build movements large enough to combat the forces that would destroy us.” p181 - 182
embrace seasonality, whether literally or metaphorically. “The metaphorical spring is a time of growth: the capacity to educate and organize new people is ramped up, relationships are expanded, and new coalitions are built. Summer, in this metaphor, is a time of consistent action, when energy is high and victories are potentially claimed. Fall is a time of harvest, when movements have achieved victories or endured losses. In fall, projects and coalitions may break down or sunset as the pace of work slows, allowing organizers time to reflect, share stories, and uplift the labor of the Previous season. The metaphorical winter is the most difficult season for many organizers because we have been conditioned to view less energetic periods of organizing as times of failure.” p211