Nietzsche Sokrates’i Neden Öldürdü?

by Adnan Esenyel

Unknown Binding

Reviews

[Uğur · Rating 4 out of 5]

Nietzsche had a quarrel. To reveal the developing human being, the transcendent human being, by reworking the meaning of human being every time without abstracting philosophy from life... Philosophy, on the other hand, was a field of struggle for Nietzsche. This field should have been absolutely inherent in life, so that philosophy and life should have been considered as two inseparable concepts. However, he had a fate that made Nietzsche a guerrilla in the middle of a vast geography where he declared the dictatorship of nothingness. His philosophy is such that Nietzsche accepted this fate and said "amor fati" and girded his sword against the religious and philosophical names of western civilization that make nothingness the basis. Going to the source of the problem, Nietzsche encounters Jesus and Socrates there. And with his deconstructionist criticism and analysis, which he would raise his philosophy, he put both Socrates and Jesus and all the philosophers who succeeded Socrates (such as Hegel, Kant, Descartes) to the sword.

At this point, let's go through philosophy without dwelling on names. Do you think philosophy should be immanent to life or should it be in a structure that speaks abstractly, acts with evidence-based information in a more rational line, and affirms the meaninglessness of the world?

Nietzsche is a name that has defeated its fate in this sense.

The book also offers us an explanation of this philosophical conflict. Especially the fact that it was evaluated from the window of Nietzsche's criticisms enabled a very successful objective attitude to be put forward.

Nothingness was not religion or reason that existed in the first place, doubt was the only thing that existed there.
Have a pleasant reading.