This book is simply awful, and I was going to give it one star, but its (probably unintended) comic value from the outlandish caricatures of Rich Liberal White Women reminded me of the satire found in Crazy Rich Asians, and that was an enjoyable book.
BLUF: Rich Liberal White Women, you will never be good enough. You will never give enough or make powerful enough concessions to women of color. You will constantly make mistakes and live in the shadow of your moral betters (BIWOC). For a donation of several thousand dollars, the authors will come to your house for two hours and upbraid you for promoting white supremacy and engaging in performative activism. As far as actionable steps for dismantling white supremacy and promoting racial equity, well, you'll need to find a different book, because there is nothing here.
This book seems to be like White Fragility, where the authors attempt to trip the guilt reflex of Rich Liberal White Women, because they are lower-hanging fruit than white men, white conservatives, or poor whites. From the preface, I had to wonder if the authors actually know any white women, because they dramatically oversimplify the supposed thought processes of white women. A vivid example was asserting that the only reason white women voted for Trump was because of racial supremacy, as opposed to any policy pronouncements or because they were totally fucking sick of the Clintons (who, by the way, are also white). Like, did you speak to *any* female Trump supporters and ask their reasons for supporting him? Or are you overgeneralizing white women as a monolith, in the same manner you accuse them of doing to nonwhite racial groups?
Something else I found really interesting is that Black and Indigenous are capitalized, but brown is not. Neither is white, but that shouldn't be surprising by now.
I don't think I'm the target audience of this book. I am a [medium beige with a cool undertone] woman, recognize and acknowledge my own racial and cultural biases, and don't believe they can be "fixed" by paying indulgences to guilt mongers. I don't think it's rational for any privileged member of a society to cede their privilege to a general Other, and that's reflected in power structures everywhere, not just within the US, and not just among white society.
So these two authors charge Rich Liberal White Women thousands of dollars to host dinner parties and tell them how racist they are with specific examples ("would you rather be one of us?" "would you rather be the Indian woman or the Black woman?"), then when the women get upset/offended/start yelling in indignation, they peace out. Maybe this creates better allies, but honestly, I'd think that the more likely outcome would be to turn the women from supporting the cause of dismantling white supremacy. (In fairness, it's entirely possible that the dramatization in the preface never actually happened as described.)
Much of the book describes vignettes involving race and the authors or their dinner dates experience racial situations, and their responses, some of which would *obviously* have been counterproductive. In one example, the black author was in a supermarket, and a brown woman was trying to walk past a white woman at a checkstand. The black woman ordered the white woman to move her cart, the white woman told her to mind her own business, the black woman responded, "you can take your white privileged ass and go straight to hell," and then was surprised that security got involved. Then she referred to her involvement in the situation as "human kindness."
One of the authors was involved with PAC, but decided to stop working with them because they hadn't actively recruited enough nonwhite members, explaining that she "didn't feel like it was a safe space for a woman of color." Several months later she decided to run for Congress and asked members of the PAC for their support and endorsement in the primary, but they politely declined and backed the incumbent, who won handily. Per the author, it was due to their racism, but she was the one who burned the bridge. Who can blame them for their reluctance to get involved with her again?
Some of the situations have nothing to do with race. One author was angry because her child had a white friend over for a playdate. The child's flaky mom asked if the author could drive him to lacrosse practice. She agreed, drove the kid across town, and then discovered that the practice time was incorrect. She dropped the kid off with a teammate who took him to the practice, kept the mom apprised the whole time, and the mom never said thanks or apologized. Author assumed it was because she's nonwhite. Lady, I can tell you with 100% certainty that this woman never thanks or apologizes to her white friends either (assuming she has any). That incident had nothing to do with race and everything to do with the fact that some people are just shitty. In another instance, a director of a non-profit thought that when potential large donors would ask detailed questions about the non-profit's mission and future plans, the donors was being racist and suspicious, rather than doing basic due diligence. There are a lot of charities, and when a person or organization wants to heavily support one at the expense of others, responsible stewardship means that they'll make sure that the group's mission aligns with their own goals and values.
The authors also complain about the lack of follow-through on behalf of white women in purchasing their expensive shame-dinners. At some point a few years ago, their organization (Race2Dinner) had gotten some press, and ~300 people reached out to them. After learning more, only 3 of those 300 ended up scheduling dinners. Obviously it was due to incorrigible racism and not wanting to hear two hours of Truth Bombs, not because $5000+ dollars for a two-hour event is extravagant, even if the cost is split up among a group. The authors make clear that their organization is an LLC, meaning that their work (whether that's sowing the seeds of further racial division or equity education) is a for-profit enterprise. They complained about one instance where it took the better part of a month to nail down a date and time for a dinner, because some group member or other would always be unavailable, and how that was an example of White Entitlement. Being fluent in White Woman myself (upper middle-class dialect), these ladies clearly had reservations about spending three weeks' worth of grocery money on an event that was designed to make them feel bad.
The authors state that all white people are racist because they are white. They also state that all Asian people are racist against Blacks, including the Asian author of this book. The Black author, well, she never admits to anything, other than that she didn't think it was her job to make sure her son treated his white school teachers with respect. And of course the incident where she cussed out a total (white) stranger for a perceived transgression against a third party. Surely that doesn't make her racist, though. There are other assertions, such as the idea that all white women are responsible for white men maintaining white supremacy because they birth them, raise them, and [mate with] them. Imagine if an author asserted that all black females should be responsible for the actions of black males for the same reasons.
I do feel hopeful in finishing this book. Hopeful that most people, regardless of race, are less bellicose and angry as these two women. Most people are *not* Mad Black Women or Histrionic Sobbing Karens. Most people are capable of looking at the world through something other than a strictly racial lens and can ascribe multiple motives to other people's actions, and can judge them based on merits besides their skin color. I'm sure I would be accused of "tone policing" or gaslighting, but I think many people would be far more diplomatic than these authors in addressing matters of race. This book is important because the authors reveal far more about themselves than somebody writing an exposé on them could, and through their own stories.