The first half of this book explored some very interesting concepts but overall felt too focused on tangential details, like the names of people who did things and the dates they did them. I read books like this for the larger conceptual pictures they paint and the patterns they can identify in our world, so I dread such factoid lists. They're also always biased toward wealthy literate people in wealthy literate nations, which just gets sillier with age and repetition. Let's move past the age of pretending these people weren't for the most part stealing their fame from subordinates, assistants, slaves, colonial subjects, illiterate sources, and colleagues who lacked the parasitic capitalist instinct.
Rather than a story of facts, I'd much rather hear a story about how those facts are connected, why their connections are important, and what the author thinks we should do with this knowledge. Thankfully the book does much more of this as it progresses, with its primary focus switching more toward complex conceptual ideas and away from rote history lists in paragraph form. This brought the book from 3 stars in the first half to 4 in the second.
The rating dropped back down to 3 stars when the author began promoting better capitalist practices as the solutions to our ecological crises. To be fair, the author was premising his capitalist aspirations on Singapore rather than, say, the U.S. - a significant improvement in many ways, at least from an ecological perspective. However, technological utopianism in a capitalist framework cannot address our currently ongoing existential emergencies. At a fundamental level capitalism is premised on infinite growth and expansion, and is therefore incompatible with sustainable management of space, land, life, health, pollution, cancer rates, mass extinctions, ecological collapse, rapid climate change, or anything else capitalists wish to pretend is either a disposable resource or an ignorable externality.
I'm not even sure this is purely an ideological commitment on the author's part. A few passages make me think he possibly hasn't yet recognized the relevant problems inherent in capitalism. For example, at one point he discusses the massive level of waste and pollution in the textile industry and uses that as a starting point to talk about the importance of recycling, reusing, and so on. It never even seems to occur to him to ask why is so much unnecessary shit being made in the first place? Nor does he ask why is necessary shit being thrown in the garbage instead of given to the people who need it?
The absence of these questions is deeply unfortunate, because once you ask them it becomes much easier to realize that the fundamental logic of capitalism itself is the critical flaw here. A similar critique holds for the related concept of colonialism, which in the modern age drives capitalism and vice versa. (Colonialism, like capitalism, necessitates the domination of large ecologies by a small number of people.)
That capitalism and colonialism are incompatible with a healthy world is an irreplaceably important realization for everyone concerned about the sustainability not only of human life but also that of the greater ecology we inhabit. This book fails to lead the reader or itself to that realization, which considering the subject matter is a critical flaw in a work that is otherwise pretty good, if also quite unevenly structured.
That said, I do think this book should be read by city managers everywhere. It'll lead to better things than what most city dwellers are currently getting.
In the end, my rating climbs back to a four because of the good writing paired with the sheer amount of fascinating information in this book that keeps me thinking about it long after finishing. Some of my favorite sections of the book included: A fascinating exploration of the history of Britain's enclosures from an ecological perspective (while sadly failing to mention that this is widely considered one of the primary initial steps in the creation of capitalism); the deep evolutionary origins of various plants that eventually came to colonize specific built environments (such as glacial origins that resemble crumbling city surfaces where "weeds" grow well); and the ecological histories of river trade, sewers, delta cities, and especially New York City (all standout sections, even if they mostly failed to explicitly address the obvious capitalist and colonial imperatives at work in those histories).