What do you think?
Rate this book


453 pages, Hardcover
First published June 7, 2022
Evidently, Nelso was trying to say that it makes no sense to try to bring old things back to life, indeed it goes against their nature. Why unspool a story that is long dead? Why reawaken something which history has decided to devour? I wanted to counter that my purpose was indeed the opposite: I wanted to kill the past whose subject I had been for too long, I wanted to hurl it down the well of the collapsing past, because the correct way to get rid of the past is not to forget it but indeed to know it.
As soon as one says "now", in fact, the now dispels and already is no more. As soon as it is born - that is, as soon as it is dead - this present-dot naturally slides backwards, dispersing into the near past. This process of discarding the present into the near past takes place incessantly and, for the most part, utterly imperceptibly, and indeed it is quite common to mistake the near past for the present. But there are some junctures, in collective or individual events, which produce sudden, unfathomable breaks in the near past. By the effect of these breaks, the near past subsides ipso facto into the remote past and becomes something completely different, so much so that any manifestation of the near past which might still persist in the present, be it an object, a place, or a memory, is silenced and becomes foreign to us. Something breaks. An extinction takes place. So there it is. This is the collapse of the past, a sudden subsidence of the near past into the remote past.