UGH
Love and hate. There's such a thin line between the two.
Do not continue if you do not want the entire thing spoiled because I can't get away from it in this review.
Ok...just creating space so nothing I say from here on out is in the blurb you can see before the 'see more' link.
Here we go....
Why didn’t Warlow even consider Fran and Rob? In every murder book and TV show, the people closest are always the first suspects, even if they're injured too. There wasn't any real looking at this which then makes them the obvious killers. Poorly done, very poorly done. However, I will give the author props for the motive, wow, that was good. So maybe us knowing early who did it was the point and our journey was not to figure out the who, but the why? This also was the case with the first book.
Why didn’t Smelling tell dci Warlow? I do not understand this.
How did Rhys make it to even be a DC with how he is portrayed the majority of the time then bam, he figures out something vital to solving the crime? I can handle gullible to a degree, or naive but not this much.
I do love the new addition to the team though, Gil is a fun character. But why the DI, who was the team lead in the last book riding the desk this time? Makes zero sense and not the best way to go about helping the reader to get to know the other team members better.
No detective would have EVER just left after the comments the victim's mother made. They just acted like it didn't happen. Or why stop the bloke they arrested from explaining what his sister told him?
Obvious things are being ignored by the detectives.
There were so many oddities like that in this book and I simply didn't understand it. The story felt too similar to the first book, so is the author limited in imagination?
The medical issue Warlow has still haven't been revealed but I think he has HIV because of his fear passing it on to someone, the 'news' was given after some bloodwork came back, and also from the revelation his uncle had it...no I do not think the uncle gave it to him or anything as sinister as that. Maybe Hep V? I don't know but there's very few conditions one could have where you would have a legitimate fear of passing it on to someone so easily and casually, even if this idea of easy transmission is a fallacy.
Way too much political/social commentary...Woke, Cisgender, etc. All fine if it fits the case or is in context of the story itself, but it had nothing to do with anything other than showing Warlow to be more of an asshole than I initially thought.
Still commenting on women’s weight. The way he described the female solicitor is vile.
Sadly, after two books, I’m going to quit the series. I actually really like the team and their interactions, the crimes were clever, but Warlow’s internal commentary on the weight and size of every single woman, including an active and fit teenage girl, has no place in the story. Any overweight female character clearly disgusts Warlow. I cannot fully call him sexist or misogynistic because he does treat the women as competent and is actually impressed by the women on his team and does care for Molly. He does comment on men’s stature but it’s less harsh and critical. I don’t know, it just grates.
In the end, it's the author Rhys Dylan who has issues with women's physical appearance because he has written the character this way. Sexist or misogynistic don't fit as I already mentioned, because of how he writes the female detectives and Warlow's thoughts on their job performance. I am struggling to figure out what this is exactly.