Let me start by saying how much I admire the bravery and persistence Goucher had to show in exposing the toxic environment at the Nike Oregon Project, largely at the hands of her former coach and abuser, but reinforced by the behemoth Nike corporation that continued to support this coach and take advantage of individual athletes as long as it meant winning and thus continued profits. Without her efforts, and the willingness of others to share their stories, there's no telling for how long this abuser and these cheaters would have continued to violate the trust (and bodies) of those they were ostensibly there to support; there is no telling how many more young female athletes might have been lured by promises of "being coached by the best". Her story, like so many others that share similarities, is heartbreaking.
I took a quick look at other reviews of this book and am flabbergasted by those that took aim at Goucher, saying how angry they were at how long it took her to speak out, to tell authorities of what she suspected (but had no proof of) and of what happened to her personally, or furthermore others questioning her motivations in doing so. It can be easy to make judgements from the outside, when we were not groomed, gaslighted, and torn down by the very person that you idolized and were taught to trust more than almost anyone, not to mention the fact that her family's livelihood depended upon her continued success as a runner and that seemed completely contingent upon obeying her abuser and the corporation for whom she had a contract with. There is no way to truly put yourself in her position and I certainly do not think it is responsible to criticize someone's timing or motivations when it comes to calling out cheaters and abusers.
What Goucher shares here is brave, not only because it's forcing her to relive terrible events, but also because she does discuss her own shortcomings, her own doubts, and her own regrets. Goucher is not trying to claim that she handled every situation perfectly. Goucher sharing her own doubts and being clear that there is much that she never knew and will likely never fully know seems genuine. In readily introducing these ambiguities into her narrative does this encourage readers to have doubts as well? Yes, I think so, but not in the cases of clear abuse. The murkiness is probably more around the extent of doping - who was doping, to what extent, and who knew. While certainly doping/cheating in the sport of running is important, to my mind it pales in comparison to very real emotional and sexual abuses. Of course, in this case the two go hand-in-hand, it was the aura of greatness that lured runners to a "win at all costs" narcissist and it was the continued backing of Nike that cemented the power of the predator who could then exact such control over his athletes.
I do think the writing itself can seem a little flat, it's attempting to report on the facts as Kara Goucher knows them. This is as much reportage as it is memoir and I think it comes off a bit stilted as a result. I listened to this as opposed to reading the physical book (as I usually do with non-fiction and particularly memoirs). Generally, I think there is value added when the book is read by the author or the person who lived the experiences, but I am not sure that was the case here - Goucher's narration was halting at times and while you could hear genuine emotion bubbling up at particular points, when it did come through it could be more uncomfortable rather than enlightening to listen to (not that it can't be both, but I do not think it was both in this case). Perhaps she could have been spared having to relive this again, this time reading aloud the written form Mary Pilon helped her to create. Pilon seemed to do justice with Goucher's story, which again could not have been easy to relay or piece together into what was a in the end a clear linear narrative, and she did an excellent job with the introduction narration.
Though the core of this story is focused on abuses of many types, both by individuals and the larger organization that supported them, there are many points of inspiration and positivity within. Goucher has accomplished so very much in her running career and these physical accomplishments are absolutely inspirational, as are those of other runners she talks about in her book, including Adam Goucher, Des Linden, Mary Cain, and Shalane Flanagan, among others. Goucher clearly loved her sport and still does, despite those that have tarnished it. Those moments where she was able to focus on the running itself showed through and I am glad she made a point of talking about her continued love of the sport, even after everything she has personally gone through, even though she may not be able to run at the level she once did, it is still something that brings her joy, and that is a beautiful thing.
“Whether you’re an elite or a first-timer, that’s the magic of marathoning, the recognition of your own potential that had been there all along.”
...
“Race day is fun, but training gives you moments of the extraordinary in the ordinary.”
...
“It destroyed me, but I loved the feeling of doing something like that again completely on my own terms.”