Any great book covering a historical topicality features the author’s ability to juxtapose depictions of preexisting conflict with modern analysis. In this respect, Christopher D. Kolenda does not disappoint with his surprisingly fast-paced, page-turning new read Leadership: The Warrior’s Art, complete with worldly forewords and statements made by the likes of Jeh Johnson, former US Secretary of Homeland Security, General Barry R. McCaffrey, and Lieutenant General Walter F. Ulmer Jr. The book itself is an editorial effort by Kolenda, who also co-authors parts of the read as well. The thinkers behind each of the book’s limited but ideologically dynamic chapters do not disappoint, making full use in individualized, categorically expert fashion of the aforementioned trait stated above about the successful historical analysis piece. Probably one of the best parts of the book reflective of this is the first chapter Kolenda authors himself - aptly titled What Is Leadership? Some Classical Ideas. “Leadership, then and now, means inspiring others to contribute their best to your team’s success,” Kolenda writes. “Success means to advance the common good: the vision, mission, goals, values, standards and expectations, and strategy of the community or organization. People contribute their best when they are committed to the common good rather than merely complying with rules and regulations. As Plato suggests, true leaders touch the soul of others, turning them toward a good purpose so that they can succeed sustainably, even in times of duress and danger…Leadership is thus more than a process of gaining compliance through carrots and sticks or a magnetic personality. The extrinsic approach only works as long as the carrots and sticks are clear and present. Nor should leadership be reduced to a set of simplistic formulas, step-by-step models, ‘mystical’ leadership secrets, or maddening diagrams and flowcharts filled with today’s management jargon. Such simplifications miss the complexity that occurs when people of free will interact.”
He subsequently writes: “…it is possible to derive some core principles (of leadership, based upon the tenets of the ancients). Trustworthiness, respect, and stewardship link (successful) personal qualities…with the interpersonal nature of leadership. They can help resolve issues such as conflicting loyalties and provide consistent models for action in situations in which right and wrong might not be clear. They can help leaders achieve what is best for both the one and the many and to achieve organizational goals while taking care of people. They help leaders develop the wisdom to stay true to their vision and values.” It’s through this constant shifting of both past and present ideology, and showing the link between past and present ideolog(ies), that really makes the specificity of the arguments in Leadership click. It’s rare for a book, even an accomplished one in its field, to avoid at least a few pitfalls inherent to bias and human error. But it’s the amalgam of accomplished expertise that helps lift the read from those typical kinds of pitfalls, while integrating varied and interesting ideas into a coherent whole…