I was unfamiliar with this reporter, but when I saw the title and summary at the library, I thought it would give a different perspective of the overall timespan of the past 35 years. I managed to get halfway through the book, hoping it would get better, but finally called it quits. My expectation was to see the story through the journalist eyes, and there was some of that, but it was the constant interjection of himself into the storyline that was irritating, (and came across as arrogant). From his claim to fame on the release of a twitter "news piece" without 2 source confirmation, to the pushing for a change of assignments with another reporter in the war zone, "to get to the exciting part of the war" yet missing out on a key aspect of prisoner/hostage rescue, I closed the book at that point. This was a good pat on his back, versus the men and women that truly were in the line of fire.